The stability and performance of the extended predictive control depend on the driver block design and, specifically, on the three factors that determine this design, that is to say, the choice of the performance criterion, the reference trajectory dynamics, and the prediction horizon. This paper presents, for a particular choice of the performance criterion, a new method to determine the closed-loop stability and performance for the class of linear stable system, taking into account the reference trajectory dynamics and the prediction horizon value. Illustrative simulation examples show how, for a certain reference trajectory dynamics, which choice is based on specifications, the selection of the prediction horizon may determine the stability and the performance nature of the closed-loop.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2015
Design Innovation Paper
Extended Predictive Control: Stability and Performance
Daniel Viúdez-Moreiras
Daniel Viúdez-Moreiras
IEEC Department,
Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia,
Madrid 28040, Spain
e-mail: dviudezmoreiras@gmail.com
Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia,
Madrid 28040, Spain
e-mail: dviudezmoreiras@gmail.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Daniel Viúdez-Moreiras
IEEC Department,
Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia,
Madrid 28040, Spain
e-mail: dviudezmoreiras@gmail.com
Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia,
Madrid 28040, Spain
e-mail: dviudezmoreiras@gmail.com
Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received October 17, 2013; final manuscript received June 18, 2015; published online August 3, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Bryan Rasmussen.
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. Nov 2015, 137(11): 115001 (8 pages)
Published Online: August 3, 2015
Article history
Received:
October 17, 2013
Revision Received:
June 18, 2015
Citation
Viúdez-Moreiras, D. (August 3, 2015). "Extended Predictive Control: Stability and Performance." ASME. J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. November 2015; 137(11): 115001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030950
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
A Case Study Comparing Both Stochastic and Worst-Case Robust Control Co-Design Under Different Control Structures
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Robust Fault Detection for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Subject to Denial-of-Service Attacks
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (May 2025)
Learning Battery Model Parameter Dynamics From Data With Recursive Gaussian Process Regression
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (May 2025)
Nonsingular Fast Terminal Sliding Mode-Based Lateral Stability Control for Three-Axis Heavy Vehicles
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (May 2025)
Related Articles
Sampled-data Control of a Class of Nonlinear Flat Systems With Application to Unicycle Trajectory Tracking
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (September,2006)
Predictive Control for Time-Delayed Switching Control Systems
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (December,2006)
Optimal Sliding Mode Cascade Control for Stabilization of Underactuated Nonlinear Systems
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (March,2012)
On the Zeros, Initial Undershoot, and Relative Degree of Collinear Lumped-Parameter Structures
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (July,2007)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Motion Prediction with Gaussian Process Dynamical Models
International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Science, 3rd (ITCS 2011)
Dynamic Control Strategy of a Biped Inspired from Human Walking
Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks Volume 18
Research on Trajectory Stability of Bomb-Parachute System
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE 2009)