Abstract

Product sustainability is a pressing global issue that requires urgent improvement, and low-carbon design is a crucial approach toward achieving sustainable product development. Digital twin technology, which connects the physical and virtual worlds, has emerged as an effective tool for supporting product design and development. However, obtaining accurate product parameters remains a challenge, and traditional low-carbon product design primarily focuses on design parameters. To address these issues, this paper proposes a method for data collection throughout the product lifecycle, leveraging the Internet of Things. The paper envisions the automatic collection of product lifecycle data to enhance the accuracy of product design. Moreover, traditional low-carbon design often has a limited scope that primarily considers product structure and lifecycle stage for optimization. In contrast, combining digital twin technology with low-carbon design can effectively improve product sustainability. Therefore, this paper proposes a three-layer architecture model of product sustainability digital twin, comprising data layer, mapping layer, and application layer. This model sets the carbon footprint as the iterative optimization goal and facilitates the closed-loop sustainable design of the product. The paper envisions sustainable product design based on digital twins that can address cascading problems and achieve closed-loop sustainable design.

References

1.
Kong
,
L.
,
Wang
,
L.
,
Li
,
F.
, and
Guo
,
J.
,
2022
, “
Toward Product Green Design of Modeling, Assessment, Optimization, and Tools: A Comprehensive Review
,”
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
,
122
(
5–6
), pp.
2217
2234
.
2.
He
,
B.
, and
Yu
,
Q.
,
2021
, “
Product Sustainable Design for Carbon Footprint During Product Life Cycle. Journal of Engineering Design
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
32
(
9
), pp.
478
495
.
3.
Kong
,
L.
,
Wang
,
L.
,
Li
,
F.
,
Lv
,
X.
,
Li
,
J.
,
Ma
,
Y.
,
Chen
,
B.
, and
Guo
,
J.
,
2021
, “
Multi-Layer Integration Framework for low Carbon Design Based on Design Features
,”
J. Manuf. Syst.
,
61
, pp.
223
238
.
4.
Eddy
,
D.
,
Krishnamurty
,
S.
,
Grosse
,
I.
,
Witherell
,
P.
,
Wileden
,
J.
, and
Lewis
,
K.
,
2014
, “
An Integrated Approach to Information Modeling for the Sustainable Design of Products
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
14
(
2
), p.
021011
.
5.
Proske
,
M.
, and
Finkbeiner
,
M.
,
2020
, “
Obsolescence in LCA–Methodological Challenges and Solution Approaches
,”
Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.
,
25
(
3
), pp.
495
507
.
6.
He
,
B.
,
Chen
,
W.
,
Li
,
F.
, and
Yuan
,
X.
,
2022
, “
Directed Acyclic Graphs-Based Diagnosis Approach Using Small Data Sets for Sustainability
,”
Comput. Ind. Eng.
,
176
, p.
108944
.
7.
Vinodh
,
S.
, and
Manjunatheshwara
,
K. J.
,
2017
, “Application of Fuzzy QFD for Environmentally Conscious Design of Mobile Phones,”
Green and Lean Management
,
Springer
,
Cham
, pp.
149
160
.
8.
Luttropp
,
C.
,
2017
, “Principles of Eco Design in Sustainable Supply Chains,”
Sustainable Supply Chains
,
Springer
,
Cham
, pp.
303
316
.
9.
Schöggl
,
J.-P.
,
Baumgartner
,
R. J.
, and
Hofer
,
D.
,
2017
, “
Improving Sustainability Performance in Early Phases of Product Design: A Checklist for Sustainable Product Development Tested in the Automotive Industry
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
140
, pp.
1602
1617
.
10.
He
,
B.
,
Wu
,
J.
, and
Xiao
,
J.
,
2023
, “
Product Safety Risk Assessment Approach to Sustainable Design
,”
Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol.
,
10
, pp.
783
788
.
11.
Wang
,
L.
,
Zhao
,
X.
, and
Dong
,
Y.
,
2020
, “
A Practical Fractional Numerical Optimization Method for Designing Economically and Environmentally Friendly Super-Tall Buildings
,”
Appl. Math. Model.
,
79
, pp.
934
953
.
12.
Babashamsi
,
P.
,
Yusoff
,
N. I. M.
,
Ceylan
,
H.
,
Nor
,
N. G. M.
, and
Jenatabadi
,
H. S.
,
2016
, “
Evaluation of Pavement Life Cycle Cost Analysis: Review and Analysis
,”
Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol.
,
9
(
4
), pp.
241
254
.
13.
El-Nounu
,
A.
,
Popov
,
A.
, and
Ratchev
,
S.
,
2018
, “
Redesign Methodology for Mechanical Assembly
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
29
(
1
), pp.
107
122
.
14.
Huang
,
Y. C.
, and
Huang
,
C. H.
,
2016
, “
Research on Relationships Among Institutional Pressure, Stewardship Behavior, Green Supply Chain Management, and Organizational Performance: The Case of Electrical and Electronics Industries in Taiwan
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
16
(
4
), p.
041010
.
15.
De Medeiros
,
J. F.
,
Da Rocha
,
C. G.
, and
Ribeiro
,
J. L. D.
,
2018
, “
Design for Sustainable Behavior (DfSB): Analysis of Existing Frameworks of Behavior Change Strategies, Experts’ Assessment and Proposal for a Decision Support Diagram
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
188
, pp.
402
415
.
16.
Afshari
,
H.
,
Peng
,
Q.
, and
Gu
,
P.
,
2016
, “
Design Optimization for Sustainable Products Under Users’ Preference Changes
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
16
(
4
), p.
041001
.
17.
Koo
,
Y.
, and
Cooper
,
R.
,
2016
, “
What Drives Socially Responsible Design in Organizations? Empirical Evidence From South Korea
,”
Des. J.
,
19
(
6
), pp.
879
901
.
18.
Singh
,
S.
,
Olugu
,
E. U.
,
Musa
,
S. N.
, and
Mahat
,
A. B.
,
2018
, “
Fuzzy-Based Sustainability Evaluation Method for Manufacturing SMEs Using Balanced Scorecard Framework
,”
J. Intell. Manuf.
,
29
(
1
), pp.
1
18
.
19.
Jackson
,
S. A.
,
Gopalakrishna-Remani
,
V.
,
Mishra
,
R.
, and
Napier
,
R.
,
2016
, “
Examining the Impact of Design for Environment and the Mediating Effect of Quality Management Innovation on Firm Performance
,”
Int. J. Prod. Econom.
,
173
, pp.
142
152
.
20.
Tao
,
J.
, and
Yu
,
S.
,
2018
, “
Product Life Cycle Design for Sustainable Value Creation: Methods of Sustainable Product Development in the Context of High Value Engineering
,”
Proc. CIRP
,
69
, pp.
25
30
.
21.
International Organization for Standardization
,
2017
,
Greenhouse Gases: Carbon Footprint of Products: Requirements and Guidelines for Quantification and Communication
,
International Organization for Standardization
,
Geneva
.
22.
He
,
B.
,
Wu
,
J.
,
Zhu
,
X.
,
Zhang
,
D.
, and
Cao
,
J.
,
2022
, “
Product Multibody Dynamics Analysis for Low-Carbon Footprint
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
23
(
2
), p.
021010
.
23.
Urata
,
T.
,
Yamada
,
T.
,
Itsubo
,
N.
, and
Inoue
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Global Supply Chain Network Design and Asian Analysis With Material-Based Carbon Emissions and Tax
,”
Comput. Ind. Eng.
,
113
, pp.
779
792
.
24.
Juarez
,
M. G.
,
Botti
,
V. J.
, and
Giret
,
A. S.
,
2021
, “
Digital Twins: Review and Challenges
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
21
(
3
), p.
030802
.
25.
He
,
B.
, and
Bai
,
K. J.
,
2021
, “
Digital Twin-Based Sustainable Intelligent Manufacturing: A Review
,”
Adv. Manuf.
,
9
(
1
), pp.
1
21
.
You do not currently have access to this content.