Abstract

Strict quality requirements in aircraft manufacturing demand high-accuracy pose adjustment systems. However, the pose alignment process of a large complex structure is also affected by thermal and gravity deformations to a great extent. Even though the pose adjustment system passes accuracy verification, the pose of the large complex structure remains challenging to smoothly and efficiently converge to the desired pose. To solve this problem, we developed a pose adjustment system enhanced by integrating physical simulation for the wing-box assembly of a large aircraft. First, the development of the pose adjustment system, which is the base of the digital pose alignment of a large aircraft’s outer wing panel, is demonstrated. Then, pose alignment principles of duplex and multiple assembly objects based on the best-fit strategy are successively explored. After that, contribution analysis is conducted for nonideal pose alignment. Immediately following, influences of thermal and gravity deformations simultaneously coexisting for the pose alignment are discussed. Finally, a physical simulation-assisted pose alignment method is developed considering multisource errors, which uses the finite element analysis to integrate temperature fluctuation and gravity field effects. Compared with a conventional digital pose adjustment system driven by the classical best-fit, deviations of the key characteristic points significantly decreased despite the impacts of thermal and gravity deformations. The enhanced pose adjustment system has been applied to large aircraft wing-box assembly. It provides an improved understanding of the pose alignment of large-scale complex structures.

References

1.
Williams
,
G.
,
Chalupa
,
E.
, and
Rahhal
,
S.
,
2000
, “
Automated Positioning and Alignment Systems
,”
SAE International
.
2.
Rüscher
,
O.
, and
Mayländer
,
H.
,
2001
, “
Automated Alignment and Marry-Up of Aircraft Fuselage Sections With a Final Assembly Line
,”
SAE International
.
3.
Smith
,
S. O.
,
Zieve
,
P. B.
, and
Gurievsky
,
M.
,
2006
, “
Join Cell for the G150 Aircraft
,”
SAE International
.
4.
Maylaender
,
H.
, and
O’Rourke
,
B.
,
2009
, “
Final Assembly Line
,”
SAE International
.
5.
Mbarek
,
T.
,
Meissner
,
A.
, and
Biyiklioglu
,
N.
,
2011
, “
Positioning System for the Aircraft Structural Assembly
,”
SAE International
.
6.
Schneider
,
T. D.
,
2015
, “
Innovative Approach for Modular and Flexible Positioning Systems for Large Aircraft Assembly
,”
SAE International
.
7.
Huang
,
J.
,
Yu
,
L.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
, and
Wang
,
Y.
,
2019
, “
A New Positioning Device Designed for Aircraft Automated Alignment System
,”
SAE International
.
8.
Ni
,
J.
,
1997
, “
CNC Machine Accuracy Enhancement Through Real-Time Error Compensation
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
119
(
4B
), pp.
717
725
.
9.
Li
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
L.
, and
Wang
,
Y.
,
2017
, “
An Optimal Method of Posture Adjustment in Aircraft Fuselage Joining Assembly With Engineering Constraints
,”
Chin. J. Aeronaut.
,
30
(
6
), pp.
2016
2023
.
10.
Guo
,
F.
,
Liu
,
J.
,
Wang
,
Z.
,
Zou
,
F.
, and
Zhao
,
X.
,
2020
, “
Positioning Error Guarantee Method With Two-Stage Compensation Strategy for Aircraft Flexible Assembly Tooling
,”
J. Manuf. Syst.
,
55
, pp.
285
301
.
11.
Ting
,
L.
,
Yanlong
,
C.
,
Jing
,
W.
, and
Jiangxin
,
Y.
,
2016
, “
Assembly Error Calculation With Consideration of Part Deformation
,”
Procedia CIRP
,
43
, pp.
58
63
.
12.
Chen
,
Z.
,
Du
,
F.
, and
Tang
,
X.
,
2018
, “
Position and Orientation Best-Fitting Based on Deterministic Theory During Large Scale Assembly
,”
J. Intell. Manuf.
,
29
(
4
), pp.
827
837
.
13.
Deng
,
Z.
,
Huang
,
X.
,
Li
,
S.
, and
Xing
,
H.
,
2019
, “
On-line Calibration and Uncertainties Evaluation of Spherical Joint Positions on Large Aircraft Component for Zero-Clearance Posture Alignment
,”
Rob. Comput. Integr. Manuf.
,
56
, pp.
38
54
.
14.
Christensen
,
K.
, and
Flynn
,
R.
, 2012, “
Developing a Control Network Crossing a Thermal Boundary: A Wing Jig Case Study With Best Practices
,”
J. CMSC
, pp.
4
9
.
15.
Khodaygan
,
S.
,
2019
, “
A Framework for Tolerance Design Considering Systematic and Random Uncertainties Due to Operating Conditions
,”
Assem. Autom.
,
39
(
5
), pp.
854
871
.
16.
Lu
,
Y.
,
Li
,
Y.
,
Li
,
N.
, and
Wu
,
X.
,
2017
, “
Reduction of Composite Deformation Based on Tool-Part Thermal Expansion Matching and Stress-Free Temperature Theory
,”
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
,
88
(
5
), pp.
1703
1710
.
17.
Ge
,
Z.
, and
Ding
,
X.
,
2018
, “
Thermal Error Control Method Based on Thermal Deformation Balance Principle for the Precision Parts of Machine Tools
,”
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
,
97
(
1
), pp.
1253
1268
.
18.
Mei
,
B.
,
Zhu
,
W.
,
Dong
,
H.
, and
Ke
,
Y.
,
2015
, “
Coordination Error Control for Accurate Positioning in Movable Robotic Drilling
,”
Assem. Autom.
,
35
(
4
), pp.
329
340
.
19.
Mei
,
B.
,
Liang
,
Z.
,
Zhu
,
W.
, and
Ke
,
Y.
,
2021
, “
Positioning Variation Synthesis for an Automated Drilling System in Wing Assembly
,”
Rob. Comput. Integr. Manuf.
,
67
, p.
102044
.
20.
Huang
,
N.
,
Yin
,
C.
,
Liang
,
L.
,
Hu
,
J.
, and
Wu
,
S.
,
2018
, “
Error Compensation for Machining of Large Thin-Walled Part With Sculptured Surface Based on On-Machine Measurement
,”
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
,
96
(
9
), pp.
4345
4352
.
21.
Zhou
,
H.
,
Hu
,
P.
,
Tan
,
H.
,
Chen
,
J.
, and
Liu
,
G.
,
2018
, “
Modelling and Compensation of Thermal Deformation for Machine Tool Based on the Real-Time Data of the CNC System
,”
Procedia Manuf.
,
26
, pp.
1137
1146
.
22.
Katageri
,
P.
,
Suresh
,
B. S.
, and
Pasha Taj
,
A.
,
2020
, “
An Approach to Identify and Select Optimal Temperature-Sensitive Measuring Points for Thermal Error Compensation Modeling in CNC Machines: A Case Study Using Cantilever Beam
,”
Mater. Today: Proc.
,
45
, pp.
264
269
.
23.
Cheng
,
L.
,
Wang
,
Q.
,
Li
,
J.
, and
Ke
,
Y.
,
2014
, “
A Posture Evaluation Method for a Large Component With Thermal Deformation and Its Application in Aircraft Assembly
,”
Assem. Autom.
,
34
(
3
), pp.
275
284
.
24.
Tao
,
F.
,
Zhang
,
M.
, and
Nee
,
A. Y. C.
,
2019
, “Chapter 1—Background and Concept of Digital Twin,”
Digital Twin Driven Smart Manufacturing
,
F.
Tao
,
M.
Zhang
, and
A. Y. C.
Nee
, eds.,
Academic Press
,
London
, pp.
3
28
.
25.
Tuegel
,
E. J.
,
Ingraffea
,
A. R.
,
Eason
,
T. G.
, and
Spottswood
,
S. M.
,
2011
, “
Reengineering Aircraft Structural Life Prediction Using a Digital Twin
,”
Int. J. Aerosp. Eng.
,
2011
, pp.
1687
5966
.
26.
Glaessgen
,
E.
, and
Stargel
,
D.
,
2012
, “
The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles
,”
53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
,
Honolulu, HI
,
Apr. 23–26
, pp.
698
700
.
27.
Qi
,
Q.
,
Tao
,
F.
,
Hu
,
T.
,
Anwer
,
N.
,
Liu
,
A.
,
Wei
,
Y.
,
Wang
,
L.
, and
Nee
,
A. Y. C.
,
2021
, “
Enabling Technologies and Tools for Digital Twin
,”
J. Manuf. Syst.
,
58
, pp.
3
21
.
28.
Arun
,
K. S.
,
Huang
,
T. S.
, and
Blostein
,
S.
,
1987
, “
Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets
,”
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.
,
PAMI
,
9
(
5
), pp.
698
700
.
29.
Ma
,
C.
, and
Jiang
,
L.
,
2007
, “
Some Research on Levenberg–Marquardt Method for the Nonlinear Equations
,”
Appl. Math. Comput.
,
184
(
2
), pp.
1032
1040
.
30.
Jin
,
Z.
,
Yu
,
C.
,
Li
,
J.
, and
Ke
,
Y.
,
2015
, “
Configuration Analysis of the ERS Points in Large-Volume Metrology System
,”
Sensors
,
15
(
9
), pp.
24397
24408
.
You do not currently have access to this content.