Partitioned dynamic simulation of multibody systems offers the benefit of increased modularity over direct simulation, thereby allowing for the use of softwares tailored to the needs of each physical subsystem. In this paper, the partitioned simulation of multibody systems is accomplished by deriving an explicit expression for the constraint forces acting between subsystems. These constraint forces form the basis of a coupling module that communicates results between subsystems, each of which can be simulated independently using tailored numerical solvers. We provide details of how this partitioned solution approach can be implemented in the framework of implicit and explicit time integrators. The computational efficiency of the proposed partitioned simulation approach is established, in comparison with direct simulation, by solving three suitable problems containing both rigid and deformable components.

1.
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
Bauchau
,
O. A.
, and
Hulbert
,
G. M.
, 2007, “
Integration of Large Deformation Finite Element and Multibody System Algorithms
,”
ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn.
1555-1423,
2
, pp.
351
359
.
2.
Tseng
,
F. -C.
, and
Hulbert
,
G. M.
, 2001, “
A Gluing Algorithm for Network-Distributed Multibody Dynamics Simulation
,”
Multibody Syst. Dyn.
1384-5640,
6
(
4
), pp.
377
396
.
3.
Tseng
,
F. -C.
,
Ma
,
Z. -D.
, and
Hulbert
,
G. M.
, 2003, “
Efficient Numerical Solution of Constrained Multibody Dynamics Systems
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
0045-7825,
192
(
3–4
), pp.
439
472
.
4.
Arnold
,
M.
, 2000, “
A Pre-Conditioned Method for the Dynamical Simulation of Coupled Mechanical Multibody Systems
,”
Z. Angew. Math. Mech.
0044-2267,
80
(
S3
), pp.
817
818
.
5.
Leimkuhler
,
B.
, 1993, “
Relaxation Techniques in Multibody Dynamics
,”
Trans. Can. Soc. Mech. Eng.
0315-8977,
17
(
4A
), pp.
459
471
.
6.
Kübler
,
R.
, and
Schiehlen
,
W.
, 2000, “
Modular Simulation in Multibody System Dynamics
,”
Multibody Syst. Dyn.
1384-5640,
4
(
2–3
), pp.
107
127
.
7.
Baumgarte
,
J.
, 1972, “
Stabilization of Constraints and Integrals of Motion in Dynamical Systems
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
0045-7825,
1
, pp.
1
16
.
8.
Park
,
K. C.
, and
Chiou
,
J. C.
, 1988, “
Stabilization of Computational Procedures for Constrained Dynamical Systems
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
0731-5090,
11
(
4
), pp.
365
370
.
9.
Yen
,
J.
,
Petzold
,
L. R.
, and
Raha
,
S.
, 1998, “
A Time Integration Algorithm for Flexible Mechanism Dynamics: The DAE α-Method
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
0045-7825,
158
, pp.
341
355
.
10.
Yen
,
J.
, and
Petzold
,
L. R.
, 1998, “
An Efficient Newton-Type Iteration for the Numerical Solution of Highly Oscillatory Constrained Mutibody Dynamic Systems
,”
SIAM J. Sci. Comput. (USA)
1064-8275,
19
(
5
), pp.
1513
1534
.
11.
Haug
,
E. J.
, 1989, “
Basic Methods
,”
Computer Aided Kinematics and Dynamics of Mechanical Systems
,
Allyn & Bacon, Inc.
,
Needham Heights, MA
, Vol.
1
.
12.
McPhee
,
J.
,
Schmitke
,
C.
, and
Redmond
,
S.
, 2004, “
Dynamic Modelling of Mechatronic Multibody Systems With Symbolic Computing and Linear Graph Theory
,”
Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst.
,
10
, pp.
1
23
.
13.
Chung
,
J.
, and
Lee
,
J. M.
, 1994, “
A New Family of Explicit Time Integration Methods for Linear and Non-Linear Structural Dynamics
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
0029-5981,
37
, pp.
3961
3976
.
14.
Chung
,
J.
, and
Hulbert
,
G. M.
, 1993, “
A Time Integration Method for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized α-Method
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
60
, pp.
371
375
.
15.
Gonzalez
,
O.
, 1999, “
Mechanical Systems Subject to Holonomic Constraints: Differential-Algebraic Formulations
,”
Physica D
0167-2789,
132
, pp.
165
174
.
16.
Simeon
,
B.
, 1996, “
Modelling a Flexible Slider Crank Mechanism by a Mixed System of DAEs and PDEs
,”
Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst.
,
2
(
1
), pp.
1
18
.
You do not currently have access to this content.