This work deals with a methodology to assess the influence of the spherical clearance joints in spatial multibody systems. The methodology is based on the Cartesian coordinates, with the dynamics of the joint elements modeled as impacting bodies and controlled by contact forces. The impacts and contacts are described by a continuous contact force model that accounts for geometric and mechanical characteristics of the contacting surfaces. The contact force is evaluated as function of the elastic pseudo-penetration between the impacting bodies, coupled with a nonlinear viscous-elastic factor representing the energy dissipation during the impact process. A spatial four-bar mechanism is used as an illustrative example and some numerical results are presented, with the efficiency of the developed methodology discussed in the process of their presentation. The results obtained show that the inclusion of clearance joints in the modelization of spatial multibody systems significantly influences the prediction of components’ position and drastically increases the peaks in acceleration and reaction moments at the joints. Moreover, the system’s response clearly tends to be nonperiodic when a clearance joint is included in the simulation.

1.
Dubowsky
,
S.
, and
Freudenstein
,
F.
, 1971, “
Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems with Clearances, Part 1: Formulation of Dynamic Model
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
93
(
1
), pp.
305
309
.
2.
Bahgat
,
B. M.
,
Osman
,
M. O. M.
, and
Sankar
,
T. S.
, 1979, “
On the Effect of Bearing Clearances in the Dynamic Analysis of Planar Mechanisms
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
0022-2542,
21
(
6
), pp.
429
437
.
3.
Seneviratne
,
L. D.
, and
Earles
,
S. W. E.
, 1992, “
Chaotic Behaviour Exhibited During Contact Loss in a Clearance Joint if a Four-Bar Mechanism
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
0094-114X,
27
(
3
), pp.
307
321
.
4.
Farahanchi
,
F.
, and
Shaw
,
S. W.
, 1994, “
Chaotic and Periodic Dynamics of a Slider-Crank Mechanism with Slider Clearance
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
177
(
3
), pp.
307
324
.
5.
Rhee
,
J.
, and
Akay
,
A.
, 1996, “
Dynamic Response of a Revolute Joint With Clearance
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
0094-114X,
31
(
1
), pp.
121
134
.
6.
Flores
,
P.
,
Ambrósio
,
J.
, and
Claro
,
J. P.
, 2004, “
Dynamic Analysis for Planar Multibody Mechanical Systems with Lubricated Joints
,”
Multibody Syst. Dyn.
1384-5640,
12
, pp.
47
74
.
7.
Lankarani
,
H. M.
, and
Nikravesh
,
P. E.
, 1990, “
A Contact Force Model With Hysteresis Damping for Impact Analysis of Multibody Systems
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472,
112
, pp.
369
376
.
8.
Ambrósio
,
J. A. C.
, 2002, “
Impact of Rigid and Flexible Multibody Systems: Deformation Description and Contact Models
,”
Virtual Nonlinear Multibody Systems
, NATO Advanced Study Institute,
W.
Schiehlen
and
M.
Valásek
, eds.,
Plenum
,
New York
, Vol.
II
, pp.
15
33
.
9.
Goldsmith
,
W.
, 1960,
Impact: The Theory and Physical Behaviour of Colliding Solids
,
Edward Arnold Ltd
,
London
.
10.
Nikravesh
,
P. E.
, 1988,
Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
11.
Hertz
,
H.
, 1896, “
On the Contact of Solids; On the Contact of Rigid Elastic Solids and on Hardness
” translated by
D. E.
Jones
and
G. A.
Schott
,
Miscellaneous Papers
,
Macmillan and Co. Ltd.
,
London
, pp.
146
183
.
12.
Chang
,
C. O.
, and
Nikravesh
,
P. E.
, 1985, “
An Adaptive Constraint Violation Stabilization Method for Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems
,”
ASME J. Mech., Transm., Autom. Des.
0738-0666,
107
, pp.
488
492
.
13.
Baumgarte
,
J.
, 1972, “
Stabilization of Constraints and Integrals of Motion in Dynamical Systems
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
0045-7825,
1
, pp.
1
16
.
14.
Shampine
,
L.
, and
Gordon
,
M.
, 1975,
Computer Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations: The Initial Value Problem
,
Freeman
,
San Francisco, CA
.
You do not currently have access to this content.