Rosette strain gages indicate shear and principal strains at specific points, whereas photoelastic coatings provide shear strain information over a broad area. Information regarding bone loading and load transfer from a prosthetic implant to adjacent bone can be obtained using either strain-measuring technique on loaded femora. This study compared proximal femoral strains derived from photoelastic coatings to those obtained from rosette strain gages applied directly to the bone in order to determine the relationships between photoelastic shear strains and rosette shear and principal strains. Photoelastic shear strains underestimated rosette shear strains and exceeded the larger of the rosette principal strains. Principal strains derived from photoelastic coatings augmented with strain separator gages underestimated their rosette counterparts in most instances. Correlation was strong and nearly linear for all measures, indicating that photoelastic coatings can accurately express proportional strain changes despite imperfect agreement in absolute strain magnitudes. The best agreement between absolute strain magnitudes occurred in the proximal medial, or calcar, region. Understanding the relationships between the various measures obtained using the two strain measurement methods will allow more accurate estimates of actual strains to be made from photoelastic coatings. [S0148-0731(00)01704-0]
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: r.r.glisson@duke.edu
Article navigation
August 2000
Technical Papers
Validity of Photoelastic Strain Measurement on Cadaveric Proximal Femora
Richard R. Glisson,
e-mail: r.r.glisson@duke.edu
Richard R. Glisson
Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
Search for other works by this author on:
Douglas S. Musgrave,
Douglas S. Musgrave
Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert D. Graham,
Robert D. Graham
Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
Search for other works by this author on:
Thomas P. Vail
Thomas P. Vail
Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard R. Glisson
Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
e-mail: r.r.glisson@duke.edu
Douglas S. Musgrave
Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
Robert D. Graham
Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
Thomas P. Vail
Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
Contributed by the Bioengineering Division for publication in the JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING. Manuscript received by the Bioengineering Division December 16, 1998; revised manuscript received March 22, 2000. Associate Technical Editor: T. M. Keaveny.
J Biomech Eng. Aug 2000, 122(4): 423-429 (7 pages)
Published Online: March 22, 2000
Article history
Received:
December 16, 1998
Revised:
March 22, 2000
Citation
Glisson, R. R., Musgrave , D. S., Graham , R. D., and Vail, T. P. (March 22, 2000). "Validity of Photoelastic Strain Measurement on Cadaveric Proximal Femora ." ASME. J Biomech Eng. August 2000; 122(4): 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1287162
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Simulation of Physiological Loading in Total Hip Replacements
J Biomech Eng (August,2006)
Optical Strain Measurement Techniques to Assist in Life Monitoring of Power Plant Components
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (April,2009)
Simulated Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Deformation under Quasi-Static Loading
J Biomech Eng (November,2005)
Proper Orthogonal Modes of a Beam Sensed with Strain Gages
J. Vib. Acoust (January,2003)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Meshless Methods for Full Field Displacement and Strain Measurement
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 1
Traffic Monitoring Using Strain Measurements and Neural Networks
Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 16
An Extensometer for Soft Material Strain Measurement
Nontraditional Methods of Sensing Stress, Strain, and Damage in Materials and Structures