The finite element method is used to evaluate the underwater blast resistance of monolithic beams and sandwich beams containing prismatic lattice cores (Y-frame and corrugated core) and an ideal foam core. Calculations are performed on both free-standing and end-clamped beams, and fluid-structure interaction effects are accounted for. It is found that the degree of core compression in the free-standing sandwich beam is sensitive to core strength, yet the transmitted impulse is only mildly sensitive to the type of sandwich core. Clamped sandwich beams significantly outperform clamped monolithic beams of equal mass, particularly for stubby beams. The Fleck and Deshpande analytical model for the blast response of sandwich beams is critically assessed by determining the significance of cross-coupling between the three stages of response: in stage I the front face is accelerated by the fluid up to the point of first cavitation, stage II involves compression of the core until the front and back faces have an equal velocity, and in stage III the sandwich beam arrests by a combination of beam bending and stretching. The sensitivity of the response to the relative magnitude of these time scales is assessed by appropriately chosen numerical simulations. Coupling between stages I and II increases the level of transmitted impulse by the fluid by 20–30% for a wide range of core strengths, for both the free-standing and clamped beams. Consequently, the back face deflection of the clamped sandwich beam exceeds that of the fully decoupled model. For stubby beams with a Y-frame and corrugated core, strong coupling exists between the core compression phase (stage II) and the beam bending/stretching phase (stage III); this coupling is beneficial as it results in a reduced deflection of the back (distal) face. In contrast, the phases of core compression (stage II) and beam bending/stretching (stage III) are decoupled for slender beams. The significance of the relative time scales for the three stages of response of the clamped beams are summarized on a performance map that takes as axes the ratios of the time scales.

1.
Fleck
,
N. A.
, and
Deshpande
,
V. S.
, 2004, “
The Resistance of Clamped Sandwich Beams to Shock Loading
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
71
(
3
), pp.
386
401
.
2.
Xue
,
Z.
, and
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
, 2004, “
A Comparative Study of Blast-Ressistant Metal Sandwich Plates
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
0734-743X,
30
(
11
), pp.
1283
1305
.
3.
Taylor
,
G. I.
, 1941, “
The Pressure and Impulse of Submarine Explosion Waves on Plates
,”
The Scientific Papers of G I Taylor
(1963), Vol.
III
,
Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge, pp.
287
303
.
4.
Deshpande
,
V. S.
, and
Fleck
,
N.
, 2005, “
A One-dimensional Response of Sandwich Plates to Underwater Shock Loading
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
0022-5096,
53
(
11
), pp.
2347
2383
.
5.
Rabczuk
,
T.
,
Kim
,
J. Y.
,
Samaniego
,
E.
, and
Belytschko
,
T.
, 2004, “
Homogenization of Sandwich Structures
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
0029-5981,
61
(
7
), pp.
1009
1027
.
6.
Liang
,
Y.
,
Spuskanyuk
,
A. V.
,
Flores
,
S. E.
,
Hayhurst
,
D. R.
,
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
,
McMeeking
,
R. M.
, and
Evans
,
A. G.
, 2005, “
The Response of Metallic Sandwich Panels of Water Blast
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936, submitted for publication.
7.
Côté
,
F.
,
Deshpande
,
V. S.
,
Fleck
,
N. A.
, and
Evans
,
A. G.
, 2005, “
The Compressive and Shear Responses of Corrugated and Diamond Lattice Materials
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
0020-7683, to appear.
8.
Côté
,
F.
,
Deshpande
,
V. S.
,
Fleck
,
N. A.
, and
Evans
,
A. G.
, 2004, “
The Out-of-Plane Compressive Behaviour of Metallic Honeycombs
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng., A
0921-5093,
380
, pp.
272
280
.
9.
Symmonds
,
P. S.
, 1954, “
Large Plastic Deformations of Beams Under Blast Type Loading
,”
Proceedings of the Second US National Congress of Applied Mechanics
, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, June, pp.
505
515
.
10.
Ashby
,
M. F.
,
Evans
,
A. G.
,
Fleck
,
N. A.
,
Gibson
,
L. J.
,
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
, and
Wadley
,
H. N. G.
, 2000,
Metal Foams: A Design Guide
,
Butterworth Heinemann
, Boston.
11.
Deshpande
,
V. S.
, and
Fleck
,
N. A.
, 2000, “
Isotropic Constitutive Models for Metallic Foams
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
0022-5096
48
, pp.
1253
1283
.
12.
Radford
,
D. D.
,
Deshpande
,
V. S.
, and
Fleck
,
N. A.
, 2005, “
The Use of Metal Foam Projectiles to Simulate Shock Loading on a Structure
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
0734-743X,
31
(
9
), pp.
1152
1171
.
13.
Sprague
,
M. A.
, 2002, “
Advanced Computational Techniques for the Analysis of 3-D Fluid-Structure Interaction with Cavitation
,” PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado.
14.
Qiu
,
X.
,
Deshpande
,
V. S.
, and
Fleck
,
N. A.
, 2003, “
Finite Element Analysis of the Dynamic Response of Sandwich Beams Subject to Shock Loading
,”
Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids
0997-7538,
22
, p.
801
814
.
You do not currently have access to this content.