Currently, mechanical design of aero engine structural components is defined by dimensioning of Design Parameters (DP's) to meet Functional Requirements (FR's). FR's are typically loads, geometrical interfaces and other boundary conditions. Parameters from downstream processes are seldom actually seen as DP's. This paper proposes that downstream process parameters are treated as DP's which calls for engineering methods that can define and evaluate these extended set of DP's. Using the proposed approach manufacturing process alternatives can be used as DP's in early stages of product development. Both the capability to quantitatively assess impact of varying manufacturing DP's, and the availability of these design methods are needed to succeed as an early phase design method. One bottleneck is the preparation time to define and generate these advanced simulation models. This paper presents how these manufacturing process simulations can be made available by automating the weld simulation preparation stages of the engineering work. The approach is based on a modular approach where the methods are defined with knowledge based engineering techniques-operating close to the CAD system. Each method can be reused and used independently of each other and adopted to new geometries. A key advantage is the extended applicability to new products, which comes with a new set of DP's. On a local level the lead time to generate such manufacturing simulation models is reduced with more than 99% allowing manufacturing process alternatives to be used as DP's in early stages of product development.

1.
Olsen, T-M., Alberg, H., and Kvist, T., 2005, “Simulation of Welding for Optimized Aero Engine Structures”, ISABE-2005–1078.
2.
Fredriksson
B.
,
Mackerle
J.
, and
Allan Persson
B G
,
1981
, “
Finite-Element Programs in Integrated Software for Structural Mechanics and CAD
”,
Computer-Aided Design
,
13
(
1)
, pp.
27
39
.
3.
Eliott
W. S.
,
1978
, “
Interactive Graphical CAD in Mechanical Engineering Design
”,
Computer-Aided Design
,
10
(
2)
, pp.
90
152
.
4.
Hibbit
D. H.
, and
Marcal
V. P.
,
1973
, “
A Numerical Thermo-mechanical Model for the Welding and Subsequent Loading of a Fabricated Structure
”,
Computers & Structures
,
3
, pp.
1145
1174
.
5.
Ueda
Y.
, and
Yamakawa
T.
,
1971
, “
Analysis of Thermal Elastic-plastic Stress and Stress during the Welding by Finite Element Method
”,
Trans. JWRI
2
, pp.
90
100
.
6.
Goldak, J., Oddy, A., McDill, M., Chakravarti, A., Bibby, M. and House, R., 1986, “Trends in Welding Research”, pp. 523.
7.
Jonsson
M.
,
Karlsson
L.
and
Lindgren
L-E.
,
1985
, “
Deformation and Stresses in Butt-Welding of Large Plates With Special References to the Material Properties
”.
Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
,
107
, pp.
265
270
.
8.
Alberg, H., 2005, “Simulation of Welding and Heat Treatment - Modelling and Validation”, Doctoral Thesis report number 2005:30, Lulea˚ University of Technology, Lulea˚.
9.
Chapman
C. B.
, and
Pinfold
M.
,
2001
, “
The Application of a Knowledge Based Engineering Approach to the Rapid Design and Analysis of an Automotive Structure
.”
Advances in Engineering Software
,
32
(
12)
, pp.
903
912
.
10.
Boart, P., Andersson, A. and Elfstro¨m, B-O., 2006 “Knowledge Enabled Pre-processing for Structural Analysis”, 1st Nordic Conference on Product Lifecycle Management - NordPLM’06.
11.
Prasad
B.
,
1997
,
Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals: Integrated Product Development
,
Prentice and Hall., Saddle River, New Jersey
Vol.
II
, pp.
330
330
.
12.
Unigraphics systems, http://www.ugs.com. accessed 2006-08-21.
13.
Thor, P., 2006, “Knowledge Driven Preprocessing for Weld Simulations”. Master Thesis report number 2006:144, Lulea˚ University of Technology, Lulea˚.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.