The Integration Framework for Architecture Development (IFAD) is an integrated framework that provides fast and consistent discipline analysis results and identifies discipline consequences corresponding to vehicle design changes. This information is valuable for balancing and integration in the early design phase. In this paper, the IFAD framework is utilized to conduct an example multi-objective multi-disciplinary optimization to evaluate vehicle performance trade-offs for a hypothetical vehicle. We consider design changes on high-level geometrical dimensions including front overhang, rear overhang and vehicle width at rocker. We also study vehicle configurations including choice of materials and tires and choice of powertrains. A commonly used multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) technique, Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGAII [1]) is chosen because of the mixed types of design variables involved (i.e., continuous design variables representing high-level geometrical dimensions and discrete design variables representing vehicle configurations such as powertrain selection and material choice). Vehicle performance analyses in a range of disciplines such as geometry, aerodynamics and energy are carried out automatically through IFAD. The use of response surface modeling (RSM) is desired due to the large number of evaluations typical for a MOGA application. A comparison of the engineering performance trade-offs based on two different sets of performance objectives is presented.

1.
Deb. K, Pratap A., Agarwal S. and Meyarivan T. (2000), “A Fast and Elitist Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm-NSGA-II,” KanGAL Report Number 2000001, http://www.iitk.ac.in/kangal/pub.htm.
2.
Fenyes, P.A. (2000), “Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization of Automotive Structures – A Parametric Approach,” AIAA-2000-4706, Proceedings of the 8th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, CA, September 6–8, 2000.
3.
Fenyes, P.A., Donndelinger, J.A. and Bourassa, J.F., (2002), “A New System for Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization,” AIAA-2002-5509, Proceedings of the 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, GA, September 4–6, 2002.
4.
Fenyes, P.A. and Donndelinger, J.A., (2003), “Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization of Vehicle Architectures with Business Considerations,” Proceedings of the 2003 International iSIGHT Automotive Conference, Southfield, MI, May 20–21, 2003.
5.
Gu, X. and Fenyes, P.A., (2004), “Application of the Integration Framework for Architecture Development for Conceptual Vehicle Design,” AIAA-2004-4315, Proceedings of the 10th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Albany, NY, August 30 - September 1, 2004.
6.
iSIGHT user manuals, Engineous Software Inc., http://www.engineous.com/product_iSIGHT.htm.
7.
Sacks
J.
,
Welch
W. J.
,
Mitchell
T. J.
, and
Wynn
H. P. J.
, (
1989
), “
Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (with discussion)
,”
Statistical Science
, No.
4
, pp.
409
435
, 1989.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.