Previous research presented a method, called the Comparative Creativity Assessment (CCA) that calculates the creativity of individual concepts in a set of designs. Several limitations regarding these metrics are addressed and mitigated within this paper with the creation of the Expanded Creativity Assessment Method (ECAM), namely how to reduce the subjectivity of the function weights and factor in combination effects between two or more functions. The subjectivity limitation is mitigated by the inclusion of the combination effects through a major expansion to the original metrics with data validation based on analyses of the original concept data (using the former method of setting the function weights) versus using the expanded method. Statistical analysis of the different methods to calculate creativity is discussed in the Results and Conclusions.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
August 17–20, 2014
Buffalo, New York, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Design Engineering Division
- Computers and Information in Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4640-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Reducing the Subjectivity in Creativity Assessment
Sarah Oman,
Sarah Oman
Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
Search for other works by this author on:
Irem Y. Tumer,
Irem Y. Tumer
Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert Stone
Robert Stone
Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
Search for other works by this author on:
Sarah Oman
Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
Irem Y. Tumer
Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
Robert Stone
Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
Paper No:
DETC2014-35369, V007T07A043; 11 pages
Published Online:
January 13, 2015
Citation
Oman, S, Tumer, IY, & Stone, R. "Reducing the Subjectivity in Creativity Assessment." Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 7: 2nd Biennial International Conference on Dynamics for Design; 26th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. Buffalo, New York, USA. August 17–20, 2014. V007T07A043. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2014-35369
Download citation file:
8
Views
0
Citations
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
The Relationship Between Design Outcomes and Mental States During Ideation
J. Mech. Des (May,2017)
Object Reorientation and Creative Performance
J. Mech. Des (March,2018)
Comparing Ideation Techniques for Beginning Designers
J. Mech. Des (October,2016)
Related Chapters
Cyber-Physical Systems, Blended Tool Environments, and Playful Creativity
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 2
Fostering a Culture of Change
Team Building (The Technical Manager's Survival Guides)
The Need for Gaps: Trusting the Corporate Instinct
Knowledge Tornado: Bridging the Corporate Knowledge Gap