This paper describes a study to understand the use of analogies by design engineers with different levels of experience. Protocol analyses of twelve design engineers have been analysed to understand the functions and reasoning of the analogies. The protocols are real world data from the aerospace industry. The findings indicate a significant difference in both the functions and reasoning by novices and experienced designers. Novices were found to predominantly transfer information without explicit reference to design issues, whereas experienced designers tended to either solve or identify problems. Experienced designers were found to reason about the function of a component and to some degree the predicted behaviour of the component, whereas the novices seem to lack such reasoning processes.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
August 3–6, 2008
Brooklyn, New York, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Design Engineering Division and Computers in Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4328-4
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Use of Analogies by Novice and Experienced Design Engineers
Saeema Ahmed,
Saeema Ahmed
Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
Bo T. Christensen
Bo T. Christensen
Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
Saeema Ahmed
Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
Bo T. Christensen
Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark
Paper No:
DETC2008-49293, pp. 11-19; 9 pages
Published Online:
July 13, 2009
Citation
Ahmed, S, & Christensen, BT. "Use of Analogies by Novice and Experienced Design Engineers." Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 4: 20th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; Second International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems. Brooklyn, New York, USA. August 3–6, 2008. pp. 11-19. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2008-49293
Download citation file:
13
Views
0
Citations
Related Proceedings Papers
Improving Design Understanding by Analyzing Questions
IDETC-CIE2007
Related Articles
An In Situ Study of Analogical Reasoning in Novice and Experienced Design Engineers
J. Mech. Des (November,2009)
Toward a Universal Social Impact Metric for Engineered Products That Alleviate Poverty
J. Mech. Des (April,2018)
Systematic Ideation Effectiveness Study of TRIZ
J. Mech. Des (October,2013)
Related Chapters
Global Harmonization of Flaw Modeling/Characterization
Global Applications of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code
Methods for Specifying Tolerances
Taguchi on Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream
Telecom: A Field with Myths and Mistakes All Its Own
More Hot Air