A feature of good modularity is the ease of changing a module within a product. Existing modularity methods use subjective or qualitative attributes to evaluate architectures. We develop a method to relatively compare proposed product architectures according to design complexity. Our metric represents the difficulty that different module boundary interactions, represented by flows in and out of a function, would have in terms of redesign effort. We decomposed medical injector head systems and conducted interviews in two companies to find out a relative redesign effort for various interaction types, e.g. electrical and mechanical connection, signal flows, etc. We found that to change a flow by 1%, 1–4% more design effort is required, depending on the interaction type. We also found that decreasing a flow value causes, in general, less rework than increasing a flow. Our metric proved to be a valuable tool in estimating the redesign difficulty of an architecture.
- Design Engineering Division and Computers and Information in Engineering Division
Incorporating Design Complexity Measures in Architectural Assessment
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Holtta, KMM, & Otto, KN. "Incorporating Design Complexity Measures in Architectural Assessment." Proceedings of the ASME 2003 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 3b: 15th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. Chicago, Illinois, USA. September 2–6, 2003. pp. 525-532. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2003/DTM-48648
Download citation file: