0
Research Papers

A Novel Wire-Driven Variable-Stiffness Joint Based on a Permanent Magnetic Mechanism

[+] Author and Article Information
Ming Zhang

School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation,
Northeastern University,
Shenyang 110819, China
e-mail: zhangming@stumail.neu.edu.cn

Lijin Fang

Faculty of Robot Science and Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Shenyang 110169, China
e-mail: ljfang@mail.neu.edu.cn

Feng Sun

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Shenyang University of Technology,
Shenyang 110870, China
e-mail: sunfeng@sut.edu.cn

Koichi Oka

Department of Intelligent Mechanical Systems Engineering,
Kochi University of Technology,
Kami-city, Kochi 782-8502, Japan
e-mail: oka.koichi@kochi-tech.ac.jp

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics. Manuscript received July 2, 2018; final manuscript received April 22, 2019; published online July 8, 2019. Assoc. Editor: K. H. Low.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 11(5), 051001 (Jul 08, 2019) (9 pages) Paper No: JMR-18-1194; doi: 10.1115/1.4043684 History: Received July 02, 2018; Accepted April 25, 2019

The variable-stiffness joint (VSJ) plays an important role in creating compliant and powerful motions. This paper presents a novel wire-driven VSJ based on a permanent magnetic mechanism (PMM). The proposed joint regulates the joint stiffness with lower energy consumption through a wide range via the permanent magnetic mechanism. This effect possibly depends on the novel nonlinear combination of a permanent magnet-spring and wire-driven system that achieves the same stiffness with lower wire tension. A trapezoidal layout of the joint is proposed. Because of the relationship among the stiffness, the position of the joint and the stiffness of the PMM, the stiffness model is also been established. Based on this model, the decoupling controller is built to independently control the position and stiffness of the joint. Experiments show that the VSJPMM achieves position and stiffness independently and also reduces energy and power required to regulate the stiffness compared with the traditional approach. In addition, the proposed mechanism displays a powerful motion and short stiffness adjustment time.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Topics: Stiffness , Wire
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Albu-Schäffer, A., Ott, C., and Hirzinger, G., 2007, “A Unified Passivity-Based Control Framework for Position, Torque, Impedance Control of Flexible Joint Robots,” Int. J. Robot. Res., 26(1), pp. 23–39. [CrossRef]
Liu, L., Leonhardt, S., and Misgeld, B. J. E., 2016, “Design and Control of a Mechanical Rotary Variable Impedance Actuator,” Mechatronics, 39, pp. 226–236. [CrossRef]
Kim, B., and Song, J., 2012, “Design and Control of a Variable Stiffness Actuator Based on Adjustable Moment Arm,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 28(5), pp. 1145–1151. [CrossRef]
Sui, C., and Zhao, M., 2006, “Statics and Stiffness Study on a 3-DOF Parallel Wire Driven Flexible Manipulator,” J. Mech. Eng., 42(6), pp. 205–210. [CrossRef]
Hogan, N., and Buerger, S., 2005, “Impedance and Interaction Control,” Robotics and Automation Handbook, T. Kurfess, ed., CNC Press, New York, pp. 1901–1924.
Tao, Y., Wang, T., and Wang, Y., 2015, “A New Variable Stiffness Robot Joint,” Ind. Robot, 42(4), pp. 371–378. [CrossRef]
Park, J., and Song, J., 2010, “A Nonlinear Stiffness Safe Joint Mechanism Design for Human Robot Interaction,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 132(6), p. 061005. [CrossRef]
Alazmani, A., Keeling, D. G., Walker, P. G., Abbas, S. K., Jaber, O., Sivananthan, M., Watterson, K., and Levesley, M. C., 2013, “Design and Evaluation of a Buckled Strip Compliant Actuator,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 18(6), pp. 1819–1826. [CrossRef]
Yalcin, M., Uzunoglu, B., Altintepe, E., and Patoglu, V., 2013, “VnSA: Variable Negative Stiffness Actuation Based on Nonlinear Deflection Characteristics of Buckling Beams,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 3–7, pp. 5418–5424.
Migliore, S. A., Brown, E. A., and DeWeerth, S. P., 2007, “Novel Nonlinear Elastic Actuators for Passively Controlling Robotic Joint Compliance,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 129(4), pp. 406–412. [CrossRef]
Jafari, A., Tsagarakis, N. G., and Caldwell, D. G., 2013, “A Novel Intrinsically Energy Efficient Actuator with Adjustable Stiffness (AWAS),” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 18(1), pp. 355–365. [CrossRef]
Tsagarakis, N. G., Sardellitti, I., and Caldwell, D. G., 2011, “A New Variable Stiffness Actuator (CompAct-VSA): Design and Modelling,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, CA, Sept. 25–30, pp. 174–179.
Wang, W., Fu, X., Li, Y., and Yun, C., 2016, “Design of Variable Stiffness Based on Modified Gear-Rack Mechanism,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 8(6), p. 061008. [CrossRef]
Wolf, S., and Hirzinger, G., 2008, “A New Variable Stiffness Design: Matching Requirements of the Next Robot Generation,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Pasadena, CA, May 19–23, pp. 1741–1746.
Park, J., and Song, J. B., 2010, “Safe Joint Mechanism Using Inclined Link With Springs for Collision Safety and Positioning Accuracy of a Robot Arm,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Anchorage, AK, May 3–7, pp. 813–818.
Tonietti, G., Schiavi, R., and Bicchi, A., 2004, “Optimal Mechanical/Control Design for Safe and Fast Robotics,” Experimental Robotics IV: The 9th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, Singapore, June 18–21, pp. 311–320.
Koganezawa, K., Nakazawa, T., and Inaba, T., 2006, “Antagonistic Control of Multi-DoF Joint by Using the Actuator with the Actuator with Non-Linear Elasticity,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, FL, May 15–17, pp. 2201–2207.
Koganezawa, K., Inaba, T., and Nakazawa, T., 2006, “Stiffness and Angle Control of Antagonistially Driven Joint,” First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), Pisa, Italy, Feb. 20–22, pp. 1007–1013.
Nakanishi, Y., Ito, N., Shirai, T., Osada, M., Ohta, S., Urata, J., Okada, K., and Inaba, M., 2011, “Design of Powerful and Flexible Musculoskeletal Arm by Using Nonlinear Spring Unit and Electromagnetic Clutch Opening Mechanism,” IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Piscataway, NJ, Oct. 26–28, pp. 377–382.
Osada, M., Ito, N., Nakanishi, Y., and Inaba, M., 2010, “Realization of Flexible Motion by Musculoskeletal Humanoid “Kojiro” With Add-on Nonlinear Spring Units,” IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Piscataway, NJ, Dec. 6–8, pp. 378–383.
Migliore, S. A., Brown, E. A., and DeWeerth, S. P., 2005, “Biologically Inspired Joint Stiffness Control,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 18–22, pp. 4508–4513.
Catalano, M. G., Grioli, G., Garabini, M., Bonomo, F., Mancini, M., Tsagarakis, N., and Bicchi, A., 2011, “VSA-CubeBot. A Modular Variable Stiffness Platform for Multi Degrees of Freedom Systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China, May 9–13, pp. 5090–5095.
Osada, M., Ito, N., Nakanishi, Y., and Inaba, M., 2010, “Stiffness Readout in Musculo-Skeletal Humanoid Robot by Using Rotary Potentiometer,” IEEE Sensors Conference, Piscataway, Nov. 1–4, pp. 2329–2333.
Nam, K. H., Kim, B. S., and Song, J. B., 2010, “Compliant Actuation of Parallel-Type Variable Stiffness Actuator Based on Antagonistic Actuation,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 24(11), pp. 2315–2321. [CrossRef]
Chou, C. P., and Hannaford, B., 1996, “Measurement and Modeling of McKibben Pneumatic ArtificialMuscles,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 12(1), pp. 90–102. [CrossRef]
Laffranchi, M., Tsagarakis, N., and Caldwell, D. G., 2011, “A Compact Compliant Actuator (CompAct TM) With Variable Physical Damping,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Shanghai, China, May 9–13, pp. 4644–4650.
Shafer, A. S., and Kermani, M. R., 2011, “On the Feasibility and Suitability of MR Fluid Clutches in Human-Friendly Manipulators,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 16(6), pp. 1073–1082. [CrossRef]
Zhou, X., Jun, S., and Krovi, V., 2015, “A Cable Based Active Variable Stiffness Module With Decoupled Tension,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 7(1), p. 011005. [CrossRef]
Tonietti, G., Schiavi, R., and Bicchi, A., 2005, “Design and Control of a Variable Stiffness Actuator for Safe and Fast Physical Human/Robot Interaction,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 18–22, pp. 526–531.
Ebrahimi, B., Khamesee, M. B., and Golnaraghi, M. F., 2008, “Design and Modeling of a Magnetic Shock Absorber Based on Eddy Current Damping Effect,” J. Sound Vib., 315(4–5), pp. 875–889. [CrossRef]
Sodano, H. A., Bae, J. S., Inman, D. J., and Belvin, W. K., 2005, “Concept and Model of Eddy Current Damper for Vibration Suppression of a Beam,” J. Sound Vib., 288(4–5), pp. 1177–1196. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Prototype of the VSJPMM. (a) CAD design of VSJPMM. (b) The internal structure of the prototype. 1, wire; 2, pulley with V-groove; 3, permanent magnet mechanism; 4, pulley with V-groove; 5, wire winch; 6, harmonic reducer and DC servo motor with encoder; 7, base; 8, shaft and thin-walled ball bearings; 9, operating arm; 10, encoder; and 11, fixed seat.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Structure of the PMM. (a) Cutaway view of PMM. (b) Photo of PMM. 1, fixed pulley; 2, wire; 3, movable pulley; 4, slideway; 5, fixed annular permanent magnet; and 6, movable annular permanent magnet.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Mechanistic model of the VSJPMM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Wire-driven system. d means the half-horizontal distance between the two fixed pulleys, r′ means the pulley radius, and h means the vertical distance between the fixed pulley and the movable pulley

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Schematic diagram of the control system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

VSJPMM prototype system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Changing axial displacement between the magnets (Color version online.)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

VSJPMM stiffness regulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Stiffness and position decoupling test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Response of the position step at different stiffness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Response of the position step at different stiffness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Sine trajectory tracking

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Playing darts with VSJPMM

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In