0
Technical Brief

Dexterous Workspace Optimization for a New Hybrid Parallel Robot Manipulator

[+] Author and Article Information
Serdar Kucuk

Technology Faculty,
Biomedical Engineering,
Kocaeli University,
Umuttepe Campus,
Kocaeli 41380, Turkey
e-mail: skucuk@kocaeli.edu.tr

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS AND ROBOTICS. Manuscript received January 11, 2018; final manuscript received August 23, 2018; published online October 1, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Shaoping Bai.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 10(6), 064503 (Oct 01, 2018) (8 pages) Paper No: JMR-18-1009; doi: 10.1115/1.4041334 History: Received January 11, 2018; Revised August 23, 2018

In this paper, a new hybrid parallel robot (HPR) manipulator is introduced. First three kinematic limbs of six-legged general Stewart platform (6DOF GSP) manipulator are disconnected. Afterward, each passive universal joint of remaining three-legged parallel manipulator (three-UPS) is mounted at the center of each second passive revolute joint of RPR planar parallel manipulator (3DOF PPM) where underlined letters present active joints. Active actuators of PPM mounted between base platform of GSP and ground perform translations along x and y-axes, and rotation about z-axis. Remaining three limbs of GSP mechanism provide translation z-axis, and rotation about x- and y-axes only. Thus HPR can perform motion with full dimensions (translation and rotation about x-, y-, and z-axes). Optimizations are performed by using particle swarm optimization algorithm. Optimization results demonstrated that HPR provides better dexterity and singularity-free workspace characteristics than GSP.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Giberti, H. , and Ferrari, D. , 2015, “ A Novel Hardware-in-the-Loop Device for Floating Offshore Wind Turbines and Sailing Boats,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 85, pp. 82–105. [CrossRef]
Sun, T. , and Lian, B. , 2018, “ Stiffness and Mass Optimization of Parallel Kinematic Machine,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 120, pp. 73–88. [CrossRef]
Stewart, D. , 1965, “ A Platform With Six Degrees of Freedom,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 180(1), pp. 371–386. [CrossRef]
Tanev, T. K. , 2000, “ Kinematics of a Hybrid (Parallel-Serial) Robot Manipulator,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 35 (9), pp. 1183–1196. [CrossRef]
Shahinpoor, M. , 1992, “ Kinematics of a Parallel-Serial (Hybrid) Manipulator,” J. Rob. Syst., 9(1), pp. 17–36. [CrossRef]
Xu, P. , Cheung, C.-F. , Bing, L. , Lai-Ting, H. , and Zhang, J.-F. , 2017, “ Kinematics Analysis of a Hybrid Manipulator for Computer Controlled Ultra-Precision Freeform Polishing,” Rob. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 44, pp. 44–56. [CrossRef]
Pisla, D. , Gherman, B. , Plitea, N. , Gyurka, B. , Calin, V. , Vlad, L. , Graur, F. , Radu, C. , Suciu, M. , Szilaghi, A. , and Stoica, A. , 2011, “ PARASURG Hybrid Parallel Robot for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Chirurgia, 5(4), pp. 629–625.
Kucuk, S. , 2016, “ Maximal Dexterous Trajectory Generation and Cubic Spline Optimization for Fully Planar Parallel Manipulators,” Comput. Electr. Eng., 56, pp. 634–647. [CrossRef]
Kennedy, J. , and Eberhart, R. , 1995, “ Particle Swarm Optimization,” IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, WA, Australia, Nov. 27–Dec. 1, pp. 1942–1948.
Toz, M. , and Kucuk, S. , 2013, “ Dimensional Optimization of 6-DOF 3-CCC Type Asymmetric Parallel Manipulator,” Adv. Rob., 28(9), pp. 625–637. [CrossRef]
Kucuk, S. , 2017, “ Optimal Trajectory Generation Algorithm for Serial and Parallel Manipulators,” Rob. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 48, pp. 219–232. [CrossRef]
Inner, B. , and Kucuk, S. , 2013, “ A Novel Kinematic Design, Analysis and Simulation Tool for General Stewart Platforms,” Simulation, 89 (7), pp. 876–897. [CrossRef]
Kucuk, S. , 2011, “ Simulation and Design Tool for Performance Analysis of Planar Parallel Manipulators,” Simulation, 88 (5), pp. 542–556. [CrossRef]
Salisbury, J. K. , and Craig, J. J. , 1982, “ Articulated Hands: Force Control and Kinematic Issues,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 4(1), pp. 4–17. [CrossRef]
Pond, G. , and Carretero, J. A. , 2006, “ Formulating Jacobian Matrices for the Dexterity Analysis of Parallel Manipulators,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 41 (12), pp. 1505–1519. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Schematic diagram of HPR, (b) passive prismatic joint, (c) solid structure of HPR, and (d) limbs on the direction of L1−b1−m1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Singularity-free zones of leg type-8 ((a), (b), (c), and (d) for HPR, (e), (f), (g), and (h) for GSP)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

(a) Stewart platform with leg type-8, (b) workspace of Stewart platform with leg type-8, (c) HPR manipulator with leg type-8, and (d) workspace of HPR manipulator with leg type-8

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Six-UPS GSP manipulator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Normalized regular-shaped dexterity results for HPR manipulator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Normalized regular-shaped dexterity results of HPR manipulator for case 1, 2, and 3

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In