Research Papers

Novel Design of Legged Mobile Landers With Decoupled Landing and Walking Functions Containing a Rhombus Joint

[+] Author and Article Information
Rongfu Lin

State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Systems
and Vibration,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
800 Dongchuan Road,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: rongfulin@sjtu.edu.cn

Weizhong Guo

State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Systems
and Vibration,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
800 Dongchuan Road,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: wzguo@sjtu.edu.cn

Meng Li

State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Systems
and Vibration,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
800 Dongchuan Road,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: noray@sjtu.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS AND ROBOTICS. Manuscript received December 29, 2017; final manuscript received June 26, 2018; published online August 24, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Leila Notash.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 10(6), 061017 (Aug 24, 2018) (14 pages) Paper No: JMR-17-1446; doi: 10.1115/1.4040884 History: Received December 29, 2017; Revised June 26, 2018

During extraterrestrial planetary exploration programs, autonomous robots are deployed using a separate immovable lander and rover. This mode has some limitations. In this paper, a concept of a novel legged robot with decoupled functions was introduced that has inbuilt features of a lander and rover. Currently, studies have focused mainly on performance analysis of the lander without a walking function. However, a systematic type synthesis of the legged mobile lander has not been studied. In this paper, a new approach to the type synthesis used for the robot was proposed based on the Lie group theory. The overall concept and design procedure were proposed and described. The motion requirements of the robot and its legs were extracted and described intuitively. The layouts of the subgroups or submanifolds of the limbs were determined. A family of particular joints with one rotation and one translation was proposed for the first time. The structures of the limbs were synthesized. Numerous structures of the legs were produced and listed corresponding to the desired displacement manifolds. Numerous novel structures of the legs for legged mobile lander were evaluated and listed. Then, four qualitative criteria were introduced. Based on the proposed criteria, a particular case of legs' configuration with a rhombus joint was selected as the best one among them. A typical structure of the legged mobile lander was obtained by assembling the structures of the proposed legs with a rhombus joint. Finally, the typical robot was used as an example to verify the capabilities of the novel robot using a software simulation (adams).

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Donahue, B. B. , Caplin, G. , Smith, D. B. , Behrens, J. W. , and Maulsby, C. , 2008, “ Lunar Lander Concepts for Human Exploration,” J. Spacecr. Rockets, 45(2), pp. 383–393. [CrossRef]
Hapke, B. , 1967, “ Surveyor I and Luna IX Pictures and the Lunar Soil,” Icarus, 6(1–3), pp. 254–269. [CrossRef]
Williams, R. J. , and Gibson, E. K. , 1972, “ The Origin and Stability of Lunar Goethite, Hematite and Magnetite,” Earth Planet Sci. Lett., 17(1), pp. 84–88. [CrossRef]
Rogers, W. F. , 1972, “ Apollo Experience Report: Lunar Module Landing Gear Subsystem,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, Technical Report No. NASA TN D-7084. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19730010174.pdf
Parkinson, R. , 1999, “ The Use of System Models in the EuroMoon Spacecraft Design,” Acta Astronaut., 44(7–12), pp. 437–443. [CrossRef]
Okada, T. , Sasaki, S. , Sugihara, T. , Saiki, K. , Akiyama, H. , Ohtake, M. , Takeda, H. , Hasebe, N. , Kobayashi, M. , and Haruyama, J. , 2006, “ Lander and Rover Exploration on the Lunar Surface: A Study for SELENE-B Mission,” Adv. Space Res., 37(1), pp. 88–92. [CrossRef]
Prinzell , L. J., III , Kramer, L. J. , Norman, R. M. , Arthur , J. J., III , Williams, S. P. , Shelton, K. J. , and Bailey, R. E. , 2009, “ Synthetic and Enhanced Vision System for Altair Lunar Lander,” International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH, pp. 660–665 https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1108&context=isap_2009.
Wu, W. , and Yu, D. , 2014, “ Key Technologies in the Chang'E-3 Soft-Landing Project,” J. Deep Space Explor., 1, pp. 105–109.
He, P. J. L. Z. Z. , 2008, “ Conceptual Design of a Lunar Lander,” Spacecr. Eng., 17(1), pp. 18–23.
Ringrose, T. , Towner, M. , and Zarnecki, J. , 2003, “ Convective Vortices on Mars: A Reanalysis of Viking Lander 2 Meteorological Data, Sols 1–60,” Icarus, 163(1), pp. 78–87. [CrossRef]
Heet, T. L. , Arvidson, R. , Cull, S. , Mellon, M. , and Seelos, K. , 2009, “ Geomorphic and Geologic Settings of the Phoenix Lander Mission Landing Site,” J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 114(E1), p. E00E04.
Munjulury, R. C. , Berry, P. , Coca, D. B. , Prat, A. P. , and Krus, P. , 2017, “ Analytical Weight Estimation of Landing Gear Designs,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G, 231(12), pp. 2214–2227. [CrossRef]
Erturk, A. , Renno, J. M. , and Inman, D. J. , 2009, “ Modeling of Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting From an L-Shaped Beam-Mass Structure With an Application to UAVs,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 20(5), pp. 529–544. [CrossRef]
Nagendran, A. , Crowther, W. , and Richardson, R. , 2012, “ Biologically Inspired Legs for UAV Perched Landing,” IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag., 27(2), pp. 4–13. [CrossRef]
Fiorini, P. , and Burdick, J. , 2003, “ The Development of Hopping Capabilities for Small Robots,” Auton. Robots, 14(2/3), pp. 239–254. [CrossRef]
Iagnemma, K. , Shibly, H. , Rzepniewski, A. , Dubowsky, S. , and Territories, P. , 2001, “ Planning and Control Algorithms for Enhanced Rough-Terrain Rover Mobility,” International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence Robotics and Automation in Space.
Lindemann, R. , 2006, “ Mars Exploration Rover Mobility Development-Mechanical Mobility Hardware Design, Development, and Testing,” IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag., 13(2), pp. 19–26. [CrossRef]
Chuankai, L. , Baofeng, W. , and Jia, W. , 2014, “ Integrated INS and Vision Based Orientation Determination and Positioning of CE-3 Lunar Rover,” J. Spacec TT&C Tech., 33(3), pp. 250–257.
Bertrand, R. , Lamon, P. , Michaud, S. , Schiele, A. , and Siegwart, R. , 2003, “ The SOLERO Rover for Regional Exploration of Planetary Surfaces,” EGS-AGU-EUG Joint Assembly, Nice, France, Apr. 6–11.
Estier, T. , Crausaz, Y. , Merminod, B. , Lauria, M. , Piguet, R. , and Siegwart, R. , 2000, “ An Innovative Space Rover With Extended Climbing Abilities,” Space Rob., 36, pp. 333–339. http://cedb.asce.org/cgi/WWWdisplay.cgi?120331
Baglioni, P. , Elfving, A. , and Ravera, F. , 2008, “ The ExoMars Rover—Overview of Phase B1 Results,” Ninth International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space, Los Angeles, CA.
Wilcox, B. H. , 2007, “ ATHLETE: A Mobility and Manipulation System for the Moon,” IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, Mar. 3–10, pp. 1–10.
Wilcox, B. H. , 2008, “ ATHLETE: An Option for Mobile Lunar Landers,” IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, Mar. 1–8, pp. 1–8.
D, L. , Raptis, I. A. , and Price, J. , 2014, “ Design and Validation of a Centimeter-Scale Robot Collective,” IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), San Diego, CA, Oct. 5–8, pp. 918–923.
Liang, L. , Zhang, Z. , Guo, L. , Yang, C. , Zeng, Y. , Min, L. I. , and Peijian, Y. E. , 2015, “ Task Analysis of Mobile Lunar Lander in Crewed Lunar Exploration Missions,” Manned Spaceflight, 21(5), pp. 472–478.
Zhu, R. , 2009, “ Advances in the Soviet/Russian EVA Spacesuit Technology,” Manned Spaceflight, 1(15), pp. 25–45.
Birckenstaedt, B. , Hopkins, J. , Kutter, B. , Zegler, F. , and Mosher, T. , 2005, “ Lunar Lander Configurations Incorporating Accessibility, Mobility, and Centaur Cryogenic Propulsion Experience,” AIAA Paper No. 2006-7284.
Shoham, M. , and Roth, B. , 1997, “ Connectivity in Open and Closed Loop Robotic Mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 32(3), pp. 279–293. [CrossRef]
Mavroidis, C. , and Roth, B. , 1995, “ New and Revised Overconstrained Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 117(1), pp. 75–82. [CrossRef]
Deng, Z. , Yang, F. , and Tao, J. , 2012, “ Adding Sub-Chain Method for Structural Synthesis of Planar Closed Kinematic Chains,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng., 25(2), pp. 206–213. [CrossRef]
Hervé, J. M. , 1978, “ Analyse Structurelle Des Mécanismes Par Groupe Des Déplacements,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 13(4), pp. 437–450. [CrossRef]
Li, Q. , and Herve, J. M. , 2009, “ Parallel Mechanisms With Bifurcation of Schoenflies Motion,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 25(1), pp. 158–164. [CrossRef]
Wu, Y. , Li, Z. , Ding, H. , and Lou, Y. , 2008, “ Quotient Kinematics Machines: Concept, Analysis and Synthesis,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Anchorage, AK, May 3–7, pp. 1964–1969.
Gao, F. , Li, W. , Zhao, X. , Jin, Z. , and Zhao, H. , 2002, “ New Kinematic Structures for 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-DOF Parallel Manipulator Designs,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 37(11), pp. 1395–1411. [CrossRef]
Jun, H. E. , Feng, G. , Meng, X. , and Guo, W. , 2015, “ Type Synthesis for 4-DOF Parallel Press Mechanism Using G_F Set Theory,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng., 28(4), pp. 851–859. [CrossRef]
Huang, Z. , and Li, Q. C. , 2002, “ General Methodology for Type Synthesis of Symmetrical Lower-Mobility Parallel Manipulators and Several Novel Manipulators,” Int. J. Robot. Res., 21(2), pp. 131–146. [CrossRef]
Kong, X. , 2013, “ Type Synthesis of 3-DOF Parallel Manipulators With Both a Planar Operation Mode and a Spatial Translational Operation Mode 1,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 5(4), p. 041015. [CrossRef]
Zhao, T. S. , Dai, J. S. , and Huang, Z. , 2002, “ Geometric Analysis of Overconstrained Parallel Manipulators With Three and Four Degrees of Freedom,” JSME Int. J., 45(3), pp. 730–740. [CrossRef]
Lin, R. , Guo, W. , and Gao, F. , 2015, “ Type Synthesis of a Family of 4-, 5- and 6-DOF Sea Lion Ball Mechanisms With Three Limbs,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 8(2), p. 021023.
Yang, T. L. , Liu, A. X. , Jin, Q. , Luo, Y. F. , Shen, H. P. , and Hang, L. B. , 2009, “ Position and Orientation Characteristic Equation for Topological Design of Robot Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 31(2), p. 021001. http://mechanicaldesign.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/article.aspx?articleid=1472491
Kong, X. , and Gosselin, C. M. , 2005, “ Type Synthesis of 5-Dof Parallel Manipulators Based on Screw Theory,” Int. J. Robot Autom., 22(10), pp. 535–547.
Gogu, G. , 2007, “ Structural Synthesis of Fully-Isotropic Parallel Robots With Schönflies Motions Via Theory of Linear Transformations and Evolutionary Morphology,” Eur. J. Mech. A, 26(2), pp. 242–269. [CrossRef]
Xie, F. , Tiemin, L. I. , and Liu, X. , 2013, “ Type Synthesis of 4-DOF Parallel Kinematic Mechanisms Based on Grassmann Line Geometry and Atlas Method,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng., 26(6), pp. 1073–1081. [CrossRef]
Fan, C. , Liu, H. , and Zhang, Y. , 2013, “ Type Synthesis of 2T2R, 1T2R and 2R Parallel Mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 61(1), pp. 184–190. [CrossRef]
Toz, M. , and Kucuk, S. , 2014, “ Dimensional Optimization of 6-DOF 3-CCC Type Asymmetric Parallel Manipulator,” Adv. Rob., 28(9), pp. 625–637. [CrossRef]
Gao, Z. , Zhang, D. , and Ge, Y. , 2010, “ Design Optimization of a Spatial Six Degree-of-Freedom Parallel Manipulator Based on Artificial Intelligence Approaches,” Rob. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 26(2), pp. 180–189. [CrossRef]
Toz, M. , and Kucuk, S. , 2013, “ Dexterous Workspace Optimization of an Asymmetric Six-Degree of Freedom Stewart–Gough Platform Type Manipulator,” Rob. Auton. Syst., 61(12), pp. 1516–1528. [CrossRef]
Yang, P. , and Gao, F. , 2014, “ Leg Kinematic Analysis and Prototype Experiments of Walking-Operating Multifunctional Hexapod Robot,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, 228(12), pp. 2217–2232. [CrossRef]
Pan, Y. , and Gao, F. , 2014, “ A New Six-Parallel-Legged Walking Robot for Drilling Holes on the Fuselage,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, 228(4), pp. 753–764. [CrossRef]
Zhang, J. , Xu, Z. , and Zang, W. , 2007, “ The New Method of Confirming the Dead-Point Location of the Plane Lower Four-Bar Linkage,” Croat. J. Eng., 23(4), pp. 28–29, 40.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Motion requirements corresponding to the five functions: (a) deployable function, (b) landing buffer function, (c) walking function, (d) orientation adjustment, (e) terrain adaptability, and (f) integration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Concept of constructing a legged mobile lander

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Motion requirements of the legged mobile lander: (a) global motion characteristics, (b) local motion characteristics, (c) lower part of the leg, and (d) upper part of the leg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Arrangements of the subgroups or submanifolds of the limbs: (a) case I {1}∩{2}∩{6}, (b) case II {1}e IIment, (c) case III {1}∩{5}∩{6}, (d) case IV {1}∩{6}∩{6}, (e) {2}∩{2}∩{2}, (f) {2}∩{2} ∩{4}, (g) {2}∩{2}∩{5}, (h) {2}∩{2}∩{6}, (i) {2}∩{5}∩{5}, (j) {2}∩{5} ∩{6}, (k) {5}∩{5}∩{5}, and (l) {5}∩{5}∩{6}

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Equivalent motion requirements of rigid body mapping walking function (3D translations of a point): (a) {R(A,u)}{R(A,v)}{T(w)}, (b) {R(A,u)}{T(w)}{R(B,v)}, (c) R(A,u)}{T(v)}{T(u)}, (d) {R(A,u)}{R(A,v)}{R(B,w)}, (e) {C(A,u)} {R(B,u)} (f) {C(A,u)}{T(w)}, (g) {R(A,u)}{C(B,u)}, and (h) {R(A,u)}{U(B,u,v)}

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Motion transformation from {R(N,v)}{T(w)} to {R(N,v)} of the Rh joint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Six particular Rh joints with {R(A,v)}{T(w)}: (a) Rh-1, (b) Rh-2, (c) Rh-3, (d) Rh-4, (e) Rh-5, and (f) Rh-6

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Some typical structures of legs: (a) case I: UP&URR&URS, (b) case II: UP&URU&URS, (c) case III: UP&SRR &URS, and (d) case IV: RRh&2-RUS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Typical structure of the legs with the Rh joint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Typical structure of the legged mobile landers with symmetrical legs: (a) front view and (b) top view

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

One gait of the legged mobile lander

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Robot walking simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Orientation adjustment of the mobile lander

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Terrain adaptability of the mobile lander

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Three statuses of the mobile lander and its leg: (a) in the deployed position, (b) in the stowed position, and (c) in the walking position



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In