Energy-Optimal Hopping in Parallel and Series Elastic 1D Monopeds

[+] Author and Article Information
Yevgeniy Yesilevskiy

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Zhenyu Gan

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

C. David Remy

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

1Corresponding author.

ASME doi:10.1115/1.4039496 History: Received March 16, 2017; Revised February 26, 2018


In this paper, we examine the question of whether parallel elastic actuation or series elastic actuation is better suited for hopping robots. To this end, we compare and contrast the two actuation concepts in energy optimal hopping motions. To enable a fair comparison, we employ optimal control to identify motion trajectories, actuator inputs, and system parameters that are optimally suited for each actuator concept. In other words, we compare the best possible hopper with parallel elastic actuation to the best possible hopper with series elastic actuation. The optimizations are conducted for three different cost functions: positive mechanical motor work, thermal electrical losses, and positive electrical work. Furthermore, we look at three representative cases for converting rotary motor motion to linear leg motion in a legged robot. Our model featured an electric DC-motor model, a gearbox with friction, damping in the leg spring, and contact collisions. We find that the optimal actuator choice depends both on the cost function and on the conversion of motor motion to leg motion. When considering only thermal electrical losses, parallel elastic actuation always performs better. In terms of positive mechanical motor work and positive electrical work, series elastic actuation is better when there is little friction in the gear-train. For higher gear-train friction, parallel elastic actuation is more economical for these cost functions as well.

Copyright (c) 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.






Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In