Research Papers

A General Approach to the Large Deflection Problems of Spatial Flexible Rods Using Principal Axes Decomposition of Compliance Matrices

[+] Author and Article Information
Genliang Chen

State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System
and Vibration,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
800 Dongchuan Road,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: leungchan@sjtu.edu.cn

Zhuang Zhang

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacture
for Thin-Walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
800 Dongchuan Road,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: z.zhang@sjtu.edu.cn

Hao Wang

State Key Laboratory of Mechanical
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacture
for Thin-Walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
A611 Mechanical Building,
800 Dongchuan Road,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: wanghao@sjtu.edu.cn

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS AND ROBOTICS. Manuscript received September 28, 2017; final manuscript received December 22, 2017; published online April 5, 2018. Assoc. Editor: James J. Joo.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 10(3), 031012 (Apr 05, 2018) (10 pages) Paper No: JMR-17-1331; doi: 10.1115/1.4039223 History: Received September 28, 2017; Revised December 22, 2017

This paper presents a general discretization-based approach to the large deflection problems of spatial flexible links in compliant mechanisms. Based on the principal axes decomposition of structural compliance matrices, a particular type of elements, which relate to spatial six degrees-of-freedom (DOF) serial mechanisms with passive elastic joints, is developed to characterize the force-deflection behavior of the discretized small segments. Hence, the large deflection problems of spatial flexible rods can be transformed to the determination of static equilibrium configurations of their equivalent hyper-redundant mechanisms. The main advantage of the proposed method comes from the use of robot kinematics/statics, rather than structural mechanics. Thus, a closed-form solution to the system overall stiffness can be derived straightforwardly for efficient gradient-based searching algorithms. Two kinds of typical equilibrium problems are intensively discussed and the correctness has been verified by means of physical experiments. In addition, a 2DOF planar compliant parallel manipulator is provided as a case study to demonstrate the potential applications.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Howell, L. , 2001, Compliant Mechanisms, Wiley, New York.
Saxena, R. , and Saxena, A. , 2009, “ Design of Electrothermally Compliant MEMS With Hexagonal Cells Using Local Temperature and Stress Constraints,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 131(5), p. 051006. [CrossRef]
Asbeck, A. , and Cutkosky, M. , 2012, “ Designing Compliant Spine Mechanisms for Climbing,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 4(3), p. 031007. [CrossRef]
Edelmann, J. , Petruska, A. , and Nelson, B. , 2017, “ Magnetic Control of Continuum Devices,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 36(1), pp. 68–85. [CrossRef]
Marras, A. , Zhou, L. , Su, H. , and Castro, C. , 2015, “ Programmable Motion of DNA Origami Mechanisms,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 112(3), pp. 713–718. [CrossRef]
Midha, A. , Norton, T. , and Howell, L. , 1994, “ On the Nomenclature, Classification, and Abstractions of Compliant Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 116(1), pp. 270–279. [CrossRef]
Awtar, S. , Slocum, A. , and Sevincer, E. , 2007, “ Characteristics of Beam-Based Flexure Modules,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 129(6), pp. 625–639. [CrossRef]
Frisch-Fay, R. , 1962, Flexible Bars, Butterworths, Washington, DC.
Kimball, C. , and Tsai, L. , 2002, “ Modeling of Flexural Beams Subjected to Arbitrary End Loads,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 124(2), pp. 223–235. [CrossRef]
Zhang, A. , and Chen, G. , 2013, “ A Comprehensive Elliptic Integral Solution to the Large Deflection Problems of Thin Beams in Compliant Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 5(2), p. 021006. [CrossRef]
Howell, L. , and Midha, A. , 1995, “ Parametric Deflection Approximations for End-Loaded, Large-Deflection Beams in Compliant Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 117(1), pp. 156–165. [CrossRef]
Su, H. , 2009, “ A Pseudo-Rigid-Body 3R Model for Determining Large Deflection of Cantilever Beams Subject to Tip Loads,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 1(2), p. 021008. [CrossRef]
Chen, G. , Xiong, B. , and Huang, X. , 2011, “ Finding the Optimal Characteristic Parameters for 3R Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model Using an Improved Particle Swarm Optimizer,” Precis. Eng., 35(3), pp. 505–511. [CrossRef]
Zhu, S. , and Yu, Y. , 2017, “ Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model for the Flexural Beam With an Inflection Point in Compliant Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 9(3), p. 031005. [CrossRef]
Yu, Y.-Q. , and Zhu, S.-K. , 2017, “ 5R Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model for Inflection Beams in Compliant Mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 116, pp. 501–512. [CrossRef]
Jensen, B. , and Howell, L. , 2004, “ Identification of Compliant Pseudo-Rigid-Body Four-Link Mechanism Configurations Resulting in Bistable Behavior,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 125(4), pp. 701–708. [CrossRef]
Midha, A. , Bapat, S. , Mavanthoor, A. , and Chinta, V. , 2012, “Analysis of a Fixed-Guided Compliant Beam With an Inflection Point Using the Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model (PRBM) Concept,” ASME Paper No. DETC2012-71400.
Vogtmann, D. , Gupta, S. , and Bergbreiter, S. , 2013, “ Characterization and Modeling of Elastomeric Joints in Miniature Compliant Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 5(4), p. 041017. [CrossRef]
Zhou, L. , Marras, A. , Castro, C. , and Su, H. , 2016, “ Pseudo Rigid-Body Models of Compliant DNA Origami Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 8(5), p. 051013. [CrossRef]
Saxena, A. , and Ananthasuresh, G. , 2001, “ Topology Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms for Nonlinear Force-Deflection and Curved Path Specifications,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 123(1), pp. 33–42. [CrossRef]
Her, I. , 1986, “Methodology for Compliant Mechanisms Design,” Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Campanile, L. , and Hasse, A. , 2008, “ A Simple and Effective Solution of the Elastica Problem,” J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 222(12), pp. 2513–2516. [CrossRef]
Pauly, J. , and Midha, A. , 2006, “ Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model Chain Algorithm—Part 1: Introduction and Concept Development,” ASME Paper No. DETC2006-99460.
Chase, R. , Todd, R. , Howell, L. , and Magleby, S. , 2011, “ A 3-D Chain Algorithm With Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model Elements,” Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach., 39(1), pp. 142–156. [CrossRef]
Ma, F. , and Chen, G. , 2015, “ Modeling Large Planar Deflections of Flexible Beams in Compliant Mechanisms Using Chained Beam-Constraint-Model,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 8(2), p. 021018. [CrossRef]
Banerjee, A. , Bhattacharya, B. , and Mallik, A. , 2008, “ Large Deflection of Cantilever Beams With Geometric Non-Linearity: Analytical and Numerical Approaches,” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 43(5), pp. 366–376. [CrossRef]
Lan, C.-C. , 2008, “ Analysis of Large-Displacement Compliant Mechanisms Using an Incremental Linearization Approach,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 43(5), pp. 641–658. [CrossRef]
Odhner, L. , and Dollar, A. , 2012, “ The Smooth Curvature Model: An Efficient Representation of Euler-Bernoulli Flexures as Robot Joints,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 28(4), pp. 761–772. [CrossRef]
Chen, G. , and Ma, F. , 2015, “ Kinetostatic Modeling of Fully Compliant Bistable Mechanisms Using Timoshenko Beam Constraint Model,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 137(2), p. 022301. [CrossRef]
Festo Group, 2011, “ Bionic Tripod 3.0,” Festo AG & Co. KG, Esslingen, Germany, accessed Feb. 19, 2018, https://www.festo.com/bionic
Chen, G. , Wang, H. , Lin, Z. , and Lai, X. , 2015, “ The Principal Axes Decomposition of Spatial Stiffness Matrices,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 31(1), pp. 191–207. [CrossRef]
Murray, R. M. , Sastry, S. S. , and Li, Z. X. , 1994, A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Selig, J. M. , 2005, Geometric Fundamentals of Robotics, Springer, New York.
Lardner, T., and Archer, R., 1994, Mechanics of Solids: An Introduction, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Chen, I. , Yang, G. , Tan, C. , and Yeo, S. , 2001, “ Local POE Model for Robot Kinematic Calibration,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 36(11–12), pp. 1215–1239. [CrossRef]
Chen, G. , Wang, H. , and Lin, Z. , 2014, “ Determination of the Identifiable Parameters in Robot Calibration Based on the POE Formula,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 30(5), pp. 1066–1077. [CrossRef]
Cutkosky, M. , and Kao, I. , 1989, “ Computing and Controlling Compliance of a Robotic Hand,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 5(2), pp. 151–165. [CrossRef]
Dai, J. , 2014, Screw Algebra and Lie Groups and Lie Algebra, Higher Education Press, Beijing, China.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Principal axes decomposition of a general compliance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Mechanism approximation of the segment elements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Hyper-redundant mechanism approximation of flexible rods

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Experimental setup for the large deflection problems

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Experimental result of the flexible rod with large deflection

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Accuracy evaluation of the proposed method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

A planar 2DOF translational compliant mechanism

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Verification via the simulation results of FEA model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Residual errors of the proposed method from FEA model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Consuming time versus computational accuracy




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In