0
Research Papers

Design Procedure for a Fast and Accurate Parallel Manipulator

[+] Author and Article Information
Sébastien Briot

Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de
Nantes (LS2N),
CNRS,
UMR CNRS 6004,
Nantes 44321, France
e-mail: Sebastien.Briot@ls2n.fr

Stéphane Caro

Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de
Nantes (LS2N),
CNRS,
UMR CNRS 6004,
Nantes 44321, France
e-mail: Stephane.Caro@ls2n.fr

Coralie Germain

Agrocampus Ouest,
Rennes 35042, France
e-mail: coralie.germain@agrocampus-ouest.fr

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received May 2, 2017; final manuscript received September 8, 2017; published online October 9, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Byung-Ju Yi.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 9(6), 061012 (Oct 09, 2017) (11 pages) Paper No: JMR-17-1128; doi: 10.1115/1.4038009 History: Received May 02, 2017; Revised September 08, 2017

This paper presents a design procedure for a two degree-of-freedom (DOF) translational parallel manipulator, named IRSBot-2. This design procedure aims at determining the optimal design parameters of the IRSBot-2 such that the robot can reach a velocity equal to 6 m/s, an acceleration up to 20 G, and a multidirectional repeatability up to 20 μm throughout its operational workspace. Besides, contrary to its counterparts, the stiffness of the IRSBot-2 should be very high along the normal to the plane of motion of its moving platform. A semi-industrial prototype of the IRSBot-2 has been realized based on the obtained optimum design parameters. This prototype and its main components are described in the paper. Its accuracy, repeatability, elasto-static performance, dynamic performance, and elasto-dynamic performance have been measured and analyzed as well. It turns out that the IRSBot-2 has globally reached the prescribed specifications and is a good candidate to perform very fast and accurate pick-and-place operations.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Computer-aided design modeling of the IRSBot-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Kinematic chain of the kth leg (k=I, II)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Parametrization of the kth leg (k=I, II)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Beam cross section parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Bounding box of the IRSBot-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Home configuration of the IRSBot-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Optimal 2D-design of the IRSBot-2 (solution to problem (2)) and largest regular dexterous workspace (scaled)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Pareto front of the IRSBot-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Pareto-optimal solutions on the performance function space boundaries

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Scaled representation of the optimal design solution s⋆ for the IRSBot-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

IRSBot-2 robot prototype

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Benchmark for the characterization of the robot repeatability performance: (a) micrometer for measuring the repeatability and (b) ways for approaching the point at which the repeatability is tested

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

IRSBot-2 prototype repeatability: (a) along x0, (b) along y0, and (c) along z0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Experimental setup used to characterize the elastostatic performance of the IRSBot-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Point displacement of the IRSBot-2 mobile platform through its regular workspace for a 20 N external force along axis y0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Experimental setup for the robot natural frequency measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Tracking errors for the IRSBot-2 along a desired trajectory with a maximal acceleration of 4 G and a maximal velocity of 4 m/s between a PID controller and a CTC: the tracking error was divided by 20 by using the CTC. For a fair comparison, the two controllers have been set to have the same cutting frequency (29 Hz). (a) Motor 1 and (b) motor 2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Tracking errors and actuator torques for the IRSBot-2 along the test trajectory with desired maximal acceleration of 20 G (see the Appendix). The test trajectory is performed five times for a total time of 1.25 s. (a) Tracking errors and (b) actuator torques.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Path adopted for the manipulator design

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Optimal trajectory and its velocity and acceleration profiles

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In