0
Research Papers

Design Procedure for a Fast and Accurate Parallel Manipulator

[+] Author and Article Information
Sébastien Briot

Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de
Nantes (LS2N),
CNRS,
UMR CNRS 6004,
Nantes 44321, France
e-mail: Sebastien.Briot@ls2n.fr

Stéphane Caro

Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de
Nantes (LS2N),
CNRS,
UMR CNRS 6004,
Nantes 44321, France
e-mail: Stephane.Caro@ls2n.fr

Coralie Germain

Agrocampus Ouest,
Rennes 35042, France
e-mail: coralie.germain@agrocampus-ouest.fr

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received May 2, 2017; final manuscript received September 8, 2017; published online October 9, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Byung-Ju Yi.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 9(6), 061012 (Oct 09, 2017) (11 pages) Paper No: JMR-17-1128; doi: 10.1115/1.4038009 History: Received May 02, 2017; Revised September 08, 2017

This paper presents a design procedure for a two degree-of-freedom (DOF) translational parallel manipulator, named IRSBot-2. This design procedure aims at determining the optimal design parameters of the IRSBot-2 such that the robot can reach a velocity equal to 6 m/s, an acceleration up to 20 G, and a multidirectional repeatability up to 20 μm throughout its operational workspace. Besides, contrary to its counterparts, the stiffness of the IRSBot-2 should be very high along the normal to the plane of motion of its moving platform. A semi-industrial prototype of the IRSBot-2 has been realized based on the obtained optimum design parameters. This prototype and its main components are described in the paper. Its accuracy, repeatability, elasto-static performance, dynamic performance, and elasto-dynamic performance have been measured and analyzed as well. It turns out that the IRSBot-2 has globally reached the prescribed specifications and is a good candidate to perform very fast and accurate pick-and-place operations.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Clavel, R. , 1990, “ Device for the Movement and Positioning of an Element in Space,” Sogeva S.A., Montreuil, France, U.S. Patent No. 4976582.
Caro, S. , Khan, W. A. , Pasini, D. , and Angeles, J. , 2010, “ The Rule-Based Conceptual Design of the Architecture of Serial Schönflies-Motion Generators,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 45(2), pp. 251–260. [CrossRef]
Angeles, J. , Caro, S. , Khan, W. , and Morozov, A. , 2006, “ Kinetostatic Design of an Innovative Schonflies-Motion Generator,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, 220(7), pp. 935–943. [CrossRef]
Krut, S. , Nabat, V. , Company, O. , and Pierrot, F. , 2004, “ A High-Speed Parallel Robot for Scara Motions,” IEEE International Conference in Robotics and Automation (ICRA), New Orleans, LA, Apr. 26–May 1, pp. 4109–4115.
Nabat, V. , Pierrot, F. , de la O Rodriguez Mijangos, M. , Azcoita Arteche, J. M. , Bueno Zabalo, R. , Company, O. , and Florentino Perez De Armentia, K. , 2007, “ High-Speed Parallel Robot With Four Degrees of Freedom,” Fundacion Fatronik, Spain, U.S. Patent No. US7735390 B2.
Liu, X. , and Kim, J. , 2002, “ Two Novel Parallel Mechanisms With Less Than Six Degrees of Freedom and the Applications,” Workshop on Fundamental Issues and Future Research Directions for Parallel Mechanisms and Manipulators, Quebec City, QC, Canada, Oct. 3–4, pp. 172–177.
Liu, X.-J. , Wang, J. , and Pritschow, G. , 2006, “ Kinematics, Singularity and Workspace of Planar 5R Symmetrical Parallel Mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 41(2), pp. 145–169. [CrossRef]
Liu, X.-J. , Wang, J. , and Pritschow, G. , 2006, “ Performance Atlases and Optimum Design of Planar 5R Symmetrical Parallel Mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 41(2), pp. 119–144. [CrossRef]
Hesselbach, J. , Helm, M. , and Soetebier, S. , 2002, “ Connecting Assembly Modes for Workspace Enlargement,” Advances in Robot Kinematics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, pp. 347–356. [CrossRef]
Brogardh, T. , 2001, “ Device for Relative Movement of Two Elements,” ABB Group, Zürich, Switzerland, U.S. Patent No. 6301988.
Huang, T. , Li, M. , Li, Z. , Chetwynd, D. , and Whitehouse, D. , 2003, “ Planar Parallel Robot Mechanism With Two Translational Degrees of Freedom,” Patent No. WO 03055653 A1.
Germain, C. , Briot, S. , Glazunov, V. , Caro, S. , and Wenger, P. , 2011, “ IRSBOT-2: A Novel Two-DOF Parallel Robot for High-Speed Operations,” ASME Paper No. DETC2011-47564.
Pierrot, F. , Krut, S. , Company, O. , Nabat, V. , Baradat, C. , and Saenz Fernandez, A. , 2009, “ Two Degree-of-Freedom Parallel Manipulator,” Fundacion Fatronik, Spain, Patent No. WO 2009/089916 A1.
Germain, C. , Caro, S. , Briot, S. , and Wenger, P. , 2013, “ Optimal Design of the IRSBot-2 Based on an Optimized Test Trajectory,” ASME Paper No. DETC2013-13037.
Germain, C. , Caro, S. , Briot, S. , and Wenger, P. , 2013, “ Singularity-Free Design of the Translational Parallel Manipulator IRSBot-2,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 64, pp. 262–285. [CrossRef]
Gosselin, C. , and Angeles, J. , 1990, “ Singularity Analysis of Closed-Loop Kinematic Chains,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 6(3), pp. 281–290. [CrossRef]
Zlatanov, D. , Bonev, I. , and Gosselin, C. , 2002, “ Constraint Singularities of Parallel Mechanisms,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Washington, DC, May 11–15, pp. 496–502.
Briot, S. , Pashkevich, A. , and Chablat, D. , 2010, “ Optimal Technology-Oriented Design of Parallel Robots for High-Speed Machining Applications,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Anchorage, AK, May 3–7, pp. 1155–1161.
Merlet, J. , 2006, Parallel Robots, 2nd ed., Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Briot, S. , Glazunov, V. , and Arakelian, V. , 2013, “ Investigation on the Effort Transmission in Planar Parallel Manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 5(1), p. 011011. [CrossRef]
Germain, C. , 2013, “ Conception d’un robot parallèle à deux degrés de liberté pour des opérations de prise et de dépose,” Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Centrale Nantes, Nantes, France.
Germain, C. , Briot, S. , Caro, S. , and Wenger, P. , 2015, “ Natural Frequency Computation of Parallel Robots,” ASME J. Comput. Nonlin. Dyn., 10(2), p. 021004.
Deb, K. , Agrawal, S. , Pratab, A. , and Meyarivan, T. , 2000, “ A Fast and Elitist Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II,” Parallel Problem Solving From Nature-PPSN VI (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Vol. 1917, M. Schoenauer , K. Deb , G. Rudolph , Y. Xin , E. Lutton , J. J. Merelo , and S. Hans-Paul , eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 849–858.
Germain, C. , Briot, S. , Caro, S. , Izard, J. , and Baradat, C. , 2014, “ Task-Oriented Design of a High-Speed Parallel Robot for Pick-and-Place Operations,” Task-Based Optimal Design of Robots (ICRA 2014 WS), Hong Kong, China, May 31–June 7.
Khalil, W. , and Dombre, E. , 2002, Modeling, Identification and Control of Robots, Hermes Penton, London. [PubMed] [PubMed]
Hollerbach, J. , Khalil, W. , and Gautier, M. , 2008, “ Model Identification,” Handbook of Robotics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 321–344.
Wu, Y. , Klimchik, A. , Caro, S. , Furet, B. , and Pashkevich, A. , 2015, “ Geometric Calibration of Industrial Robots Using Enhanced Partial Pose Measurements,” Rob. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 35, pp. 151–168. [CrossRef]
Chaumette, F. , and Huchinson, S. , 2008, “ Visual Servoing and Visual Tracking,” Handbook of Robotics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Chap. 24. [CrossRef]
Chaumette, F. , and Hutchinson, S. , 2006, “ Visual Servo Control—Part I: Basic Approaches,” IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag., 13(4), pp. 82–90. [CrossRef]
Chaumette, F. , and Hutchinson, S. , 2007, “ Visual Servo Control—Part II: Advanced Approaches,” IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag., 14(1), pp. 109–118. [CrossRef]
Honegger, M. , Codourey, A. , and Burdet, E. , 1997, “ Adaptive Control of the Hexaglide, a 6DOF Parallel Manipulator,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Alburquerque, NM, Apr. 20–25, pp. 543–548.
Singer, N. C. , and Seering, W. P. , 1988, “ Preshaping Command Inputs to Reduce System Vibration,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, A.I. Memo No. 1027.
Singhose, W. E. , Singer, N. C. , and Seering, W. P. , 1994, “ Design and Implementation of Time-Optimal Negative Input Shapers,” International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Chicago, IL, pp. 151–157.
Douat, L. , Queinnec, I. , Garcia, G. , Michelin, M. , and Pierrot, F. , 2011, “ H-∞ Control Applied to the Vibration Minimization of the Parallel Robot Par2,” IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA), Denver, CO, Sept. 28–30, pp. 947–952.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Computer-aided design modeling of the IRSBot-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Kinematic chain of the kth leg (k=I, II)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Parametrization of the kth leg (k=I, II)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Beam cross section parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Bounding box of the IRSBot-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Home configuration of the IRSBot-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Optimal 2D-design of the IRSBot-2 (solution to problem (2)) and largest regular dexterous workspace (scaled)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Pareto front of the IRSBot-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Pareto-optimal solutions on the performance function space boundaries

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Scaled representation of the optimal design solution s⋆ for the IRSBot-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

IRSBot-2 robot prototype

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Benchmark for the characterization of the robot repeatability performance: (a) micrometer for measuring the repeatability and (b) ways for approaching the point at which the repeatability is tested

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

IRSBot-2 prototype repeatability: (a) along x0, (b) along y0, and (c) along z0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Experimental setup used to characterize the elastostatic performance of the IRSBot-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Point displacement of the IRSBot-2 mobile platform through its regular workspace for a 20 N external force along axis y0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Experimental setup for the robot natural frequency measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Tracking errors for the IRSBot-2 along a desired trajectory with a maximal acceleration of 4 G and a maximal velocity of 4 m/s between a PID controller and a CTC: the tracking error was divided by 20 by using the CTC. For a fair comparison, the two controllers have been set to have the same cutting frequency (29 Hz). (a) Motor 1 and (b) motor 2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Tracking errors and actuator torques for the IRSBot-2 along the test trajectory with desired maximal acceleration of 20 G (see the Appendix). The test trajectory is performed five times for a total time of 1.25 s. (a) Tracking errors and (b) actuator torques.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Path adopted for the manipulator design

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Optimal trajectory and its velocity and acceleration profiles

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In