Research Papers

Locomotion of a Mini Bristle Robot With Inertial Excitation

[+] Author and Article Information
Tadeusz Majewski

Department of Industrial &
Mechanical Engineering,
Universidad de las Américas-Puebla,
Ex. Hacienda Sta. Catarina Martir,
Cholula 72810, Puebla, Mexico
e-mail: tadeusz.majewski@udlap.mx

Dariusz Szwedowicz

Centro Nacional de Investigacion y
Desarrollo Tecnologico,
Cuernavaca 82490, Morelos, Mexico
e-mail: d.sz@cenidet.edu.mx

Maciej Majewski

Power Alstom,
Warsaw 02-758, Poland
e-mail: maciej.majewski@power.alstom.com

Manuscript received November 2, 2016; final manuscript received August 8, 2017; published online September 26, 2017. Assoc. Editor: K. H. Low.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 9(6), 061008 (Sep 26, 2017) (11 pages) Paper No: JMR-16-1339; doi: 10.1115/1.4037892 History: Received November 02, 2016; Revised August 08, 2017

The paper presents a theory of vibratory locomotion, a prototype, and the results of experiments on mini robot, which moves as a result of inertial excitation provided by two electric motors. The robot is equipped with elastic bristles which are in contact with the supporting surface. Vibration of the robot generates the friction force which can push the robot forward or backward. The paper presents a novel model of interaction between the bristles and the supporting surface. The friction force (its magnitude and sense) is defined as a function of the robot velocity and the robot's vibrations. The analysis is done for a constant coefficient of friction and a smooth surface. Depending on the motors' speed, one may obtain a rectilinear or a curvilinear motion, without jumping or losing contact with the substrate. The results of the simulation show which way the robot moves, its mean velocity of locomotion, change of the slipping velocity of the bristles and its influence on the normal and the friction force. A prototype was built and experiments were performed with it.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Topics: Robots , Friction , Vibration
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Alexander, R. N. , 2006, Principles of Animal Locomotion, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Taylor, G. K. , Triantafyllou, M. S. , and Trapea, C. , eds., 2010, Animal Locomotion, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed]
Aoshima, S. , Tsujimura, T. , and Yabuta, T. , 1993, “ A Minature Mobile Robot Using Piezo Vibration for Mobility in a Tine Tube,” ASME J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control, 115(2A), pp. 270–278. [CrossRef]
Gmiterko, A. , Kelemen, M. , and Mlynkowa, Z. , 2001, “ In Pipe-Micromachine Based on the Principle of the Bristle Directional Friction Force,” Third International Conference Mechatronics, Robotics and Biomechanics, Trest, Czech Republic, pp. 95–102.
Lim, J. , Park, H. , An, J. , Yeh-Sun, H. , Kim, B. , and Byung-Ju, Y. , 2008, “ One Pneumatic Line Based Inchworm-Like Micro Robot for Half-Inch Pipe Inspection,” Mechatronics, 18(7), pp. 315–322. [CrossRef]
Liu, Q. , Ren, T. , and Chen, Y. , 2013, “ Characteristic Analysis of a Novel In-Pipe Driving Robot,” Mechatronics, 23(4), pp. 419–428. [CrossRef]
Mištinas, V. , and Spruogis, B. , 2002, “ Development of Pipe Crawling Robots With Vibratory Drives and Investigation of Their Kinematic Parameters,” Transport, 17(5), pp. 171–176.
Jatsun, S. F. , Zimmerman, K. , Zeidis, I. , and Jatsun, A. S. , 2007, “ Vibration Driven Robots for in Pipe Inspection,” International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM), Changchun, China, May 8–10, pp. 1–5.
Stepanenko, D. A. , Minchenya, V. T. , Asimov, R. M. , and Zimmermann, K. , 2012, “ Possibility of Application of Small-Size Robots With Vibratory Piezoelectric Actuators for Inspection of Physical State of Surfaces,” AIP Conf. Proceed., 1433, pp. 685–688.
Ostertag, O. , Ostertagová, E. , Kelemen, M. , Kelemenová, T. , Buša, J. , and Virgala, I. , 2014, “ Miniature Mobile Bristled In-Pipe Machine,” Int. J. Adv. Rob. Syst., 11(12), pp. 1–9. [CrossRef]
Quick D. , 2011, “ Festo Creates SmartBird Flying Robotic Seagull,” New Atlas, Robotics, Alexandria, Egypt, accessed Sept. 19, 2017, http://www.gizmag.com/smartbird-robotic-seagull/18228/
Coxworth B. , 2012, “ First of Four Autonomous Wave Glider Robots Successfully Crosses Pacific Ocean,” New Atlas, Robotics, Alexandria, Egypt, accessed Sept. 19, 2017, http://www.gizmag.com/wave-glider-arrives-australia/25316/
Raibert, I. H. , and Brown, H. B. , 1984, “ Experiments in Balance With a 2D One-Legged Hopping Machine,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 106(1), pp. 75–81. [CrossRef]
Chemousko, F. L. , 2003, “ Snake-Like Locomotion of Multi Mechanisms,” J. Vib. Control, 9(1), pp. 235–256. [CrossRef]
Sugiyama, Y. , and Hirai, S. , 2003, “ Crawling and Jumping of Deformable Soft Robot,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Sendai, Japan, Sept. 28–Oct. 2, pp. 276–3281.
Kim, B. , Lee, M. , Lee, Y. P. , Kim, Y. I. , and Lee, G. H. , 2006, “ An Earthworm-Like Micro Robot Using Shape Memory Alloy Actuator,” Sens. Actuators A, Phys., 125(2), pp. 429–437. [CrossRef]
Chen, L. , Ma, S. , Wang, Y. , and Duan, D. P. , 2007, “ Design and Modelling of a Snake Robot in Traveling Wave Locomotion,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 42(12), pp. 1632–1642. [CrossRef]
Trivedi, D. , Rahn, C. D. , Kierb, W. M. , Ian, D. , and Walker, I. D. , 2008, “ Soft Robotics: Biological Inspiration, State of the Art, and Future Research,” Appl. Bionics Biomech., 5(3), pp. 99–117. [CrossRef]
Omori, H. , Hayakawa, T. , and Nakamura, T. , 2008, “ Locomotion and Turning Patterns of a Peristaltic Crawling Earthworm Robot Composed of Flexible Units,” International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Nice, France, Sept. 22–26, pp. 1630–1635.
Lu, H. , Zhu, J. , Lin, Z. , and Guo, Y. , 2009, “ An Inchworm Mobile Robot Using Electromagnetic Linear Actuator,” Mechatronics, 19(7), pp. 1116–1125. [CrossRef]
Zhang, H. X. , Zhang, J. W. , and Wang, W. , 2010, “ From the Biological Model to a Small Climbing Caterpillar Robot,” Int. J. Adv. Mechatronic Syst., 2(1–2), pp. 90–98.
Lee, D. , Kim, S. , Park, Y. , and Wood, R. , 2011, “ Design of Centimeter-Scale Inchworm Robots With Bidirectional Claws,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Shanghai, China, May 9–13, pp. 3197–3204.
Boxerbaum, A. S. , Kendric, M. , Shaw, K. M. , Chiel, H. J. , and Quinn, R. D. , 2012, “ Continuous Wave Peristaltic Motion in a Robot,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 31(3), pp. 302–318. [CrossRef]
Seok, S. , Onal, C. D. , Cho, K. J., Wood, R. J., and Kim, S. , 2012, “ Meshworm: A Peristaltic Soft Robot With Antagonistic Nickel Titanium Coil Actuators,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 18(5), pp. 1485–1497. [CrossRef]
Li, F. , Liu, W. , Fu, X. , Bonsignori, G. , Scarfogliero, U. , Stefanini, C. , and Dario, P. , 2012, “ Jumping Like an Insect: Design and Dynamic Optimization of a Jumping Mini Robot Based on Bio-Mimetic Inspiration,” Mechatronics, 22(2), pp. 167–176. [CrossRef]
Zhang, J. , Song, G. , Li, Y. , Qiao, G. , Song, A. , and Wang, A. , 2013, “ A Bio-Inspired Jumping Robot: Modeling, Simulation, Design, and Experimental Results,” Mechatronics, 23(8), pp. 1123–1140. [CrossRef]
Ioi, K. , 1999, “ A Mobile Micro-Robot Using Centrifugal Forces,” International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Atlanta, GA, Sept. 19–23, pp. 736–741.
Becker, F. , Lysenko, V. , Minchenya, V. , Zeidis, I. , and Zimmermann, K. , 2006, “ An Approach to the Dynamics of a Vibration-Driven Robot,” Romansy 19—Robot Design, Dynamics and Control (CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences), Vol. 544, Springer, Vienna, Austria, pp. 299–308. [CrossRef]
Majewski, T. , and Alejos, R. , 2011, “ Oscillatory Locomotion,” 21st International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers (CONIELECOMP), Puebla, Mexico, Feb. 28–Mar. 2, pp. 322–327.
Eigoli, K. , and Vossoughi, G. R. , 2012, “ Locomotion Modes of a Novel Piezo-Driven Microrobot: Analytical Modeling and Performance Evaluation,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 52, pp. 248–266. [CrossRef]
DeSimone, A. , and Tatone, A. , 2012, “ Crawling Motility Through the Analysis of Model Locomotors: Two Case Studies,” Eur. Phys. J. E., 35(85), pp. 1–8.
Becker, F. , Börner, S. , Lysenko, V. , Zeidis, I. , and Zimmermann, K. , 2014, “ On the Mechanics of Bristle-Bots-Modeling, Simulation and Experiments,” International Symposium on Robotics (ISR), Munich, Germany, June 2–3, pp. 15–20.
Becker, F. , Börner, S. , Kästner, T. , Lysenko, V. , and Zeidis, I. , 2014, “ Spy Bristle Bot—A Vibration-Driven Robot for the Inspection of Pipelines,” 58th Ilmenau Scientific Colloquium, Ilmenau, Germany, Sept. 8–12, pp. 1–7.
Majewski, T. , and Szwedowicz, D. , 2014, “ Behavior of the Robot With Vibratory Excitation,” Multibody Mechatronic Systems (Mechanisms and Machine Science), Vol. 25, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 67–74. [CrossRef]
Giomi, L. , Hawley-Weld, N. , and Mahadevan, L. , 2013, “ Swarming, Swirling and Stasis in Sequestered Bristle-Bots,” Proc. R. Soc. A, 469(2151), pp. 1–18.
Cicconofri, G. , and DeSimone, A. , 2015, “ Motility of a Model Bristle-Bot: A Theoretical Analysis,” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 76, pp. 233–239. [CrossRef]
Wood, R. J. , 2008, “ The First Takeoff of a Biologically Inspired at-Scale Robotic Insect,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 24(2), pp. 1–7. [CrossRef]
Chirarattananon, P. , Ma, K. Y. , and Wood, R. J. , 2013, “ Adaptive Control for Takeoff, Hovering, and Landing of a Robotic Fly,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 3–7, pp. 3808–3815.
Ma, K. Y. , Chirarattananon, P. , and Wood, R. J. , 2015, “ Design and Fabrication of an Insect-Scale Flying Robot for Control Autonomy,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany, Sept. 28–Oct. 2, pp. 1558–1564.
Majewski, T. , Szwedowicz, D. , and Majewski, M. , 2016, “ Possible Excitations for the Bristle Robots,” 24th International Congress of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Montreal, QC, Canada, Aug. 21–26, pp. 2973–2974.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Vertical displacement yA, deformation of the bristle ΔB and normal force NB

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Reference frames and top view of the robot

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Side and front view of the robot: 1—body of the robot, 2—bristles, 3—motors, 4—supporting plane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Forces acting on the left bristle for vsB1 > 0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Velocity of the tip B1 from vertical motion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Slip velocity of the bristle's tip

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Forces in the horizontal plane (OC⌢=s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Behavior of the robot with the excitation m1e1 = m2e2 = 1 gmm, μ = 0.35, and f = 120 Hz: (a) position x(t); (b) instant velocity; (c) vertical vibration; (d), (e) slipping velocity at B1; (f), (g) normal force; and (h), (i) friction force

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Behavior of the robot for curvilinear motion for ∑me = 4 gmm, f1 = 100 Hz, f2 = 200 Hz: (a) position on the path; (b), (c) vertical and angular vibrations; (d) components of the slip velocity of the left bristles; (e), (f) friction forces of both bristles; and (g) velocity of the robot

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Magnitude of the impulse of vibratory force for one cycle of vibration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Slipping velocity (a) and friction force (b) for one cycle of vibration if m1e1 = m2e2 = 1gmm and f = 120 Hz

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Behavior of the robot with the resultant unbalance 4 gmm and frequency 120 Hz: (a) position, (b) vertical vibration, (c) instant velocity, (d) slipping velocity, (e) normal reaction, and (f) friction force

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Average velocity of the robot versus frequency of excitation: (a) unbalance ∑me = 2gmm and (b) unbalance ∑me = 4 gmm (μ = 0.4, δ = 0.5 rad, ω = 2πf)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Locomotion velocity versus coefficient of friction: (a) and velocity versus angle of the bristle inclination and (b) for f = 100 Hz and ∑me = 2 gmm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Behavior of the robot for curvilinear motion for ∑me = 2 gmm, f1 = 100 Hz, f2 = 200 Hz: (a) path of the robot; (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) coordinates versus time; (g), (h) components of the slip velocity of the left bristles; (i) velocity of the robot locomotion; (j), (k) normal and friction force of the left bristles; and (l) friction force of the right bristles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Robot on the inclined plane (a), the velocity versus the angle of inclination for total static unbalance ∑me = 2 mm (b), and for the static unbalance ∑me = 4 gmm (c)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Trajectory of the robot locomotion with different shift angle, when f1 = f2 = 120 Hz, δ = 0.7 rad, μ = 0.35 ∑me = 2 gmm; φ = π/2 (a) and φ = π (b), ∑me = 4 gmm; φ = π/2 (c) and φ = π (d)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Velocity of locomotion as a function of the angle φ when f1 = f2 = 120 Hz, α = 0.7 rad, μ = 0.35

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Prototype of mini-robot (a) and remote control (b): 1—rechargeable battery, 2—infrared receiver, 3—DC motors, 4—Arduino Nano, and 5—unbalance, 6—acrylic base (50 × 80 mm), 7—bristles, 8—power On/Off, 9—“Up”, 10—“Down,” 11—“Right,” 12—“Left”

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Acceleration of the robot in a horizontal (a) and vertical direction (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Frequency spectrum of vibration in a horizontal (a) and vertical direction (b)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In