0
Research Papers

Identification and Comparison for Continuous Motion Characteristics of Three Two-Degree-of-Freedom Pointing Mechanisms

[+] Author and Article Information
Jingjun Yu

Robotics Institute,
Beihang University,
Beijing 100191, China
e-mail: jjyu@buaa.edu.cn

Zhao Jin

Robotics Institute,
Beihang University,
Beijing 100191, China

Xianwen Kong

School of Engineering and Physical Sciences,
Heriot-Watt University,
Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK

Manuscript received February 15, 2017; final manuscript received July 5, 2017; published online August 31, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Marc Gouttefarde.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 9(5), 051015 (Aug 31, 2017) (13 pages) Paper No: JMR-17-1042; doi: 10.1115/1.4037568 History: Received February 15, 2017; Revised July 05, 2017

Two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) pointing mechanisms, including the gimbal structure, the 1-RR&2-RRR spherical parallel mechanism (SPM), and the Omni-Wrist III, are increasingly applied in tracking devices, mechanical transmission, and artificial joint. Though they share the same number of degree-of-freedom at any given configuration, they will exhibit and transfer different motion characteristics, such as rotation and rolling, when moving continuously. Thanks to the concept of operation mode, these three mechanisms' distinct continuous motion characteristics can be identified and further compared through Euler parameter quaternions, Euler angles, algebraic geometry, and axodes so that the appropriate mechanism for tracking or transmission can be selected. At first, elementary operation modes are numerated based on the number of zero components in a quaternion. In order to acquire all possible operation modes, a set of constraint equations relating to each mechanism are formulated, and an algebraic geometry method is adopted to solve the constraint equations that are much too complicated. For rotation, namely, 1DOF (one-degree-of-freedom) operation mode, its continuous rotation axes are investigated. As to rolling, namely, 2DOF operation mode, allowing for the fact that the difference in 2DOF operation mode of the three mechanisms is not intuitive, axode characteristics of the three mechanisms are investigated and compared. It is found that from the above process of identification and comparison on rotation and rolling, the three mechanisms' distinctive motion characteristics can be effectively obtained.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A flowchart of analysis for pointing mechanisms' continuous motion characteristics

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Kinematic model of the gimbal-type pointing mechanism

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Kinematic model of the 1-RR&2-RRR pointing manipulator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Kinematic model of the Omni–Wrist III

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Structural analysis of the Omni–Wrist III: (a) limb analysis and (b) geometry analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Coordinate frames established in the Omni–Wrist III

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Axodes when β is π/6 and α varies from 0 to 2π

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Axodes when α  = 0 and β varies from 0 to π/2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Axodes when β is π/6 and α changes from 0 to 2π

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Axodes when β is π/4 and α changes from 0 to 2π

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Axodes when β is π/6 and α changes from 0 to 2π

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Axodes when β is π/4 and α changes from 0 to 2π

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In