Research Papers

A Low Profile Electromagnetic Actuator Design and Model for an Origami Parallel Platform

[+] Author and Article Information
Marco Salerno

Station 9,
Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
e-mail: marco.salerno@epfl.ch

Amir Firouzeh

Station 9,
Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
e-mail: amir.firouzeh@epfl.ch

Jamie Paik

Station 9,
Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
e-mail: jamie.paik@epfl.ch

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received July 26, 2016; final manuscript received March 27, 2017; published online May 2, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Jian S. Dai.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 9(4), 041005 (May 02, 2017) (11 pages) Paper No: JMR-16-1214; doi: 10.1115/1.4036425 History: Received July 26, 2016; Revised March 27, 2017

Thin foldable origami mechanisms allow reconfiguration of complex structures with large volumetric change, versatility, and at low cost; however, there is rarely a systematic way to make them autonomously actuated due to the lack of low profile actuators. Actuation should satisfy the design requirements of wide actuation range, high actuation speed, and backdrivability. This paper presents a novel approach toward fast and controllable folding mechanisms by embedding an electromagnetic actuation system into a nominally flat platform. The design, fabrication, and modeling of the electromagnetic actuation system are reported, and a 1.7 mm-thick single-degree-of-freedom (DoF) foldable parallel structure reaching an elevation of 13 mm is used as a proof of concept for the proposed methodology. We also report on the extensive test results that validate the mechanical model in terms of the loaded and unloaded speed, the blocked force, and the range of actuation.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Wood, R. J. , Avadhanula, S. , Sahai, R. , Steltz, E. , and Fearing, R. S. , 2008, “ Microrobot Design Using Fiber Reinforced Composites,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 130(5), p. 052304. [CrossRef]
Felton, S. , Tolley, M. , Demaine, E. , Rus, D. , and Wood, R. , 2014, “ A Method for Building Self-Folding Machines,” Science, 345(6197), pp. 644–646. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Haldane, D. W. , Casarez, C. S. , Karras, J. T. , Lee, J. , Li, C. , Pullin, A. O. , Schaler, E. W. , Yun, D. , Ota, H. , Javey, A. , and Fearing, R. S. , 2015, “ Integrated Manufacture of Exoskeletons and Sensing Structures for Folded Millirobots,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 7(2), p. 021011. [CrossRef]
Koh, J. S. , and Cho, K. J. , 2013, “ Omega-Shaped Inchworm-Inspired Crawling Robot With Large-Index-and-Pitch (LIP) SMA Spring Actuators,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 18(2), pp. 419–429. [CrossRef]
Firouzeh, A. , and Paik, J. , 2015, “ Robogami: A Fully Integrated Low-Profile Robotic Origami,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 7(2), p. 021009. [CrossRef]
Noh, M. , Kim, S. W. , An, S. , Koh, J. S. , and Cho, K. J. , 2012, “ Flea-Inspired Catapult Mechanism for Miniature Jumping Robots,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 28(5), pp. 1007–1018. [CrossRef]
Zhakypov, Z. , Falahi, M. , Shah, M. , and Paik, J. , 2015, “ The Design and Control of the Multi-Modal Locomotion Origami Robot, Tribot,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany, Sept. 28–Oct. 2, pp. 4349–4355.
Wood, R. J. , 2008, “ The First Takeoff of a Biologically Inspired At-Scale Robotic Insect,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 24(2), pp. 341–347. [CrossRef]
Salerno, M. , Zhang, K. , Menciassi, A. , and Dai, J. S. , 2016, “ A Novel 4-DOF Origami Grasper With an SMA-Actuation System for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 32(3), pp. 484–498. [CrossRef]
Zhang, K. , Qiu, C. , and Dai, J. S. , 2016, “ An Extensible Continuum Robot With Integrated Origami Parallel Modules,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 8(3), p. 031010. [CrossRef]
Zhang, K. , Dai, J. S. , and Fang, Y. , 2010, “ Topology and Constraint Analysis of Phase Change in the Metamorphic Chain and Its Evolved Mechanism,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(12), p. 121001. [CrossRef]
Zhang, K. , and Dai, J. S. , 2014, “ A Kirigami-Inspired 8R Linkage and Its Evolved Overconstrained 6R Linkages With the Rotational Symmetry of Order Two,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 6(2), p. 021007. [CrossRef]
Baisch, A. T. , Sreetharan, P. S. , and Wood, R. J. , 2010, “ Biologically-Inspired Locomotion of a 2g Hexapod Robot,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Taipei, Taiwan, Oct. 18–22, pp. 5360–5365.
Diller, E. , Pawashe, C. , Floyd, S. , and Sitti, M. , 2011, “ Assembly and Disassembly of Magnetic Mobile Micro-Robots Towards Deterministic 2-D Reconfigurable Micro-Systems,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 30(14), pp. 1667–1680. [CrossRef]
Reissman, T. , Park, J. S. , and Garcia, E. , 2012, “ Multilayer, Stacked Spiral Copper Inductors on Silicon With Micro-Henry Inductance Using Single-Level Lithography,” Act. Passive Electron. Compon., 2012, p. 871620. [CrossRef]
Sun, X. , Zheng, Y. , Li, Z. , Li, X. , and Zhang, H. , 2013, “ Stacked Flexible Parylene-Based 3D Inductors With Ni80Fe20 Core for Wireless Power Transmission System,” IEEE 26th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Taipei, Taiwan, Jan. 20–24, pp. 849–852.
Meyer, C. D. , Bedair, S. S. , Morgan, B. C. , and Arnold, D. P. , 2012, “ Influence of Layer Thickness on the Performance of Stacked Thick-Film Copper Air-Core Power Inductors,” IEEE Trans. Magn., 48(11), pp. 4436–4439. [CrossRef]
Futai, N. , Matsumoto, K. , and Shimoyama, I. , 2004, “ A Flexible Micromachined Planar Spiral Inductor for Use as an Artificial Tactile Mechanoreceptor,” Sens. Actuators, A, 111(2), pp. 293–303. [CrossRef]
Takahashi, H. , Dohi, T. , Matsumoto, K. , and Shimoyama, I. , 2007, “ A Micro Planar Coil for Local High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” IEEE 20th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Hyogo, Japan, Jan. 21–25, pp. 549–552.
Kim, K. H. , Yoon, H. J. , Jeong, O. C. , and Yang, S. S. , 2005, “ Fabrication and Test of a Micro Electromagnetic Actuator,” Sens. Actuators, A, 117(1), pp. 8–16. [CrossRef]
Zárate, J. J. , Tosolini, G. , Petroni, S. , De Vittorio, M. , and Shea, H. , 2015, “ Optimization of the Force and Power Consumption of a Microfabricated Magnetic Actuator,” Sens. Actuators, A, 234, pp. 57–64. [CrossRef]
Cugat, O. , Basrour, S. , Divoux, C. , Mounaix, P. , and Reyne, G. , 2001, “ Deformable Magnetic Mirror for Adaptive Optics: Technological Aspects,” Sens. Actuators, A, 89(1), pp. 1–9. [CrossRef]
Benali-Khoudja, M. , Hafez, M. , and Kheddar, A. , 2007, “ VITAL: An Electromagnetic Integrated Tactile Display,” Displays, 28(3), pp. 133–144. [CrossRef]
Chang, P. J. , Chang, F. W. , Yuen, M. C. , Otillar, R. , and Horsley, D. A. , 2014, “ Force Measurements of a Magnetic Micro Actuator Proposed for a Microvalve Array,” J. Micromech. Microeng., 24(3), p. 034005. [CrossRef]
Gieras, J. F. , Piech, Z. J. , and Tomczuk, B. , 2011, Linear Synchronous Motors: Transportation and Automation Systems, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Cugat, O. , Delamare, J. , and Reyne, G. , 2003, “ Magnetic Micro-Actuators and Systems (MAGMAS),” IEEE Trans. Magn., 39(6), pp. 3607–3612. [CrossRef]
Niarchos, D. , 2003, “ Magnetic MEMS: Key Issues and Some Applications,” Sens. Actuators, A, 109(1), pp. 166–173. [CrossRef]
COMSOL, 2011, “ AB. AC/DC Module—User's Guide,” COMSOL, Inc., Burlington, MA.
Firouzeh, A. , Sun, Y. , Lee, H. , and Paik, J. , 2013, “ Sensor and Actuator Integrated Low-Profile Robotic Origami,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 3–7, pp. 4937–4944.
Grover, F. W. , 2004, Inductance Calculations: Working Formulas and Tables, Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford, MA.
Kasap, S. O. , 2006, Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Qiu, C. , Zhang, K. , and Dai, J. S. , 2016, “ Repelling-Screw Based Force Analysis of Origami Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 8(3), p. 031001. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Parallel mechanism designed as a proof of concept of the foldable actuation mechanism: the unfolded 2D configuration top and side views (left), and 3D folded configuration upon actuation, top and side views (right). The arrows mark the direction of motion of the platform components after coil powering.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Miniaturized electromagnetic actuator: working principle and main components. The arrows mark the magnetization direction of magnet and coils.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of the layers composing the platform (left), assembled system in the unfolded 2D state (center), and folded 3D system configuration (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Double slider mechanism. The proposed platform is axially symmetric and composed of three double sliders arranged at 120 deg from one another and sharing the prismatic joint.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Working principle of the miniaturized electromagnetic actuator: (a) schematic of the assembled actuator and (b) exploded view of the layers composing the actuator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Magnet–coils interactions. The reference system used to define the position of the magnet with respect to the coils (a). Resultant force acting on the magnet with increasing X positions (b). Resulting FEM forces in X and Z directions by changing magnet X position ((c)–(d)). Resulting FEM forces in X direction by changing magnet X position and magnet elevation along Z (e). Resulting FEM forces in Z direction by changing magnet X position and magnet elevation along Z (f).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Schematics of the articulated parallel platform in pop-up (left) and planar (right) configurations with design parameters used. The values of the parameters used are reported in Table 2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Mask and coil prototypes. Comparison of masks ((a) and (b)); corresponding resulting coils ((c)–(d)). In the manufactured coil, the underetching effect is visible; conductor tracks are much thinner than the corresponding mask tracks.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Platform prototype. The alignment holes used during the fabrication process are visible in both pictures. The assembled system is in the 2D state (left) and in the pop-up state (right).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Platform prototype sizes. The weights of the components and subcomponents highlighted in the figure are reported in Table 3.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Free-body diagrams of the three links composing the double slider mechanism

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Description of experimental setups and tests performed. The setup for the verification of the coils' time constant is composed of a Hall effect sensor and the coil system (a). The setup for verification of the single rail dynamics is composed of a high-speed camera and a tracking marker (b).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Magnetic field development with time: for actuation voltages of 20 and 30 V, verifying negligible electromagnetic transient response

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Normalized magnetic flux density decrease due to thermal increase: simulation (a), experimental (b), and B field expected decrease per second for different input voltages (c)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

The slider's position on the rail. The Fx for different positions along the rail is reported (a). For different voltages, the magnet position in time is reported (b). Calculated parameters used in the comparison with the model (c).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Magnet motion calculated parameters comparison: maximum speed (a), maximum position (b), final position (c), and motion time (d). Simulations (circles), and experiments (dots). The error bars are calculated from the standard deviation of three repetitions.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Description of experimental setups and tests performed. The setup for the verification of the platform dynamics includes a marker on each leg (a). The setup for the payload tests includes a mass placed on top of the platform (b).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

The pop-up platform's tracking performance. At the different voltages we report the top platform position (a), speed (b), and acceleration (c).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Pop-up platform with a mass on top. For different weights, we report the top platform position (a), speed (b), and acceleration (c). We report the minimum elevation and powering voltage to initiate motion in the legend.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Pop-up platform calculated motion parameters comparison: maximum speed (a), maximum position (b), final position (c), and motion time (d). Comparison of the experimental (dots) and simulated (circles) results is reported. The trends are very similar, and the simulation captures well the platform motion.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Legged system steady forces tests. Experimental setup (a) includes a force sensor and a microstage placed on top of the platform. The comparison between experimental (dots) and theoretical results is reported (b).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Pop-up platform with mass on top, simulation results. For different weights and input voltages, the top platform achievable position ranges (a) and speeds (b) are reported.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Envisioned platform where a delta robot is interfaced with the proposed actuation system: folded portable configuration (left) and 3D pop-up configuration (right)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In