0
Research Papers

Geometric Error Effects on Manipulators' Positioning Precision: A General Analysis and Evaluation Method

[+] Author and Article Information
Henrique Simas

Raul Guenther Laboratory of Applied Robotics,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Federal University of Santa Catarina,
Florianópolis, SC 88040-900, Brazil
e-mail: henrique.simas@ufsc.br

Raffaele Di Gregorio

Department of Engineering,
University of Ferrara,
Via Saragat, 1,
Ferrara 44100, Italy
e-mail: rdigregorio@ing.unife.it

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received February 28, 2016; final manuscript received August 15, 2016; published online October 6, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Leila Notash.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 8(6), 061016 (Oct 06, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: JMR-16-1049; doi: 10.1115/1.4034577 History: Received February 28, 2016; Revised August 15, 2016

Manufacturing and assembly (geometric) errors affect the positioning precision of manipulators. In six degrees-of-freedom (6DOF) manipulators, geometric error effects can be compensated through suitable calibration procedures. This, in general, is not possible in lower-mobility manipulators. Thus, methods that evaluate such effects must be implemented at the design stage to determine both which workspace region is less affected by these errors and which dimensional tolerances must be assigned to match given positioning-precision requirements. In the literature, such evaluations are mainly tailored on particular architectures, and the proposed techniques are difficult to extend. Here, a general discussion on how to take into account geometric error effects is presented together with a general method to solve this design problem. The proposed method can be applied to any nonoverconstrained architecture. Eventually, as a case study, the method is applied to the analysis of the geometric error effects of the translational parallel manipulator (TPM) Triflex-II.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Liu, H. , Huang, T. T. , and Chetwynd, D. G. , 2011, “ A General Approach for Geometric Error Modeling of Lower Mobility Parallel Manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 3(2), p. 021013. [CrossRef]
Huang, T. , Whitehouse, D. J. , and Chetwynd, D. G. , 2002, “ A Unified Error Model for Tolerance Design, Assembly and Error Compensation of 3-DOF Parallel Kinematic Machines With Parallelogram Struts,” CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 51(1), pp. 297–301. [CrossRef]
Di Gregorio, R. , and Parenti-Castelli, V. , 2002, “ Geometric Errors Versus Calibration in Manipulators With Less Than 6 DOF,” RoManSy 14—Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators, G. Bianchi , J.-C. Guinot , and C. Rzymkowski , eds., Springer, New York, pp. 31–38.
Fang, Y. , and Tsai, L. , 2002, “ Structure Synthesis of a Class of 4-DOF and 5-DOF Parallel Manipulators With Identical Limb Structures,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 21(9), pp. 799–810. [CrossRef]
Kong, X. , and Gosselin, C. M. , 2007, Type Synthesis of Parallel Mechanisms, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Klimchik, A. , Chablat, D. , and Pashkevich, A. , 2014, “ Stiffness Modeling for Perfect and Non-Perfect Parallel Manipulators Under Internal and External Loadings,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 79, pp. 1–28. [CrossRef]
Caro, S. , Wenger, P. , Bennis, F. , and Chablat, D. , 2006, “ Sensitivity Analysis of the Orthoglide: A 3-DOF Translational Parallel Kinematic Machine,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 128(2), pp. 392–402. [CrossRef]
Liu, X.-J. , and Wang, J. , 2014, Parallel Kinematics: Type, Kinematics, and Optimal Design (Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering), Springer, Berlin.
Gosselin, C. , and Angeles, J. , 1991, “ A Global Performance Index for the Kinematic Optimization of Robotic Manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 113(3), pp. 220–226. [CrossRef]
Tian, W. , Gao, W. , Chang, W. , and Nie, Y. , 2014, “ Error Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis of a Five-Axis Machine Tool,” Math. Probl. Eng., 2014, p. 745250.
Merlet, J.-P. , 2005, “ Jacobian, Manipulability, Condition Number, and Accuracy of Parallel Robots,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 128(1), pp. 199–206. [CrossRef]
Li, Y. , Li, C. , Qu, D. , Duan, S. , Bai, X. , and Shen, H. , 2012, “ Errors Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis for a Novel Parallel Manipulator,” International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), Aug. 5–8, pp. 755–760.
Mei, J. , Ni, Y. , Li, Y. , Zhang, L. , and Liu, F. , 2009, “ The Error Modeling and Accuracy Synthesis of a 3-DOF Parallel Robot Delta-s,” International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA’09), pp. 289–294.
Frisoli, A. , Solazzi, M. , Pellegrinetti, D. , and Bergamasco, M. , 2011, “ A New Screw Theory Method for the Estimation of Position Accuracy in Spatial Parallel Manipulators With Revolute Joint Clearances,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 46(12), pp. 1929–1949. [CrossRef]
Yu, Z. , Tiemin, L. , and Xiaoqiang, T. , 2011, “ Geometric Error Modeling of Machine Tools Based on Screw Theory,” Proc. Eng., 24, pp. 845–849. [CrossRef]
Kumaraswamy, U. , Shunmugam, M. , and Sujatha, S. , 2013, “ A Unified Framework for Tolerance Analysis of Planar and Spatial Mechanisms Using Screw Theory,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 69, pp. 168–184. [CrossRef]
Chen, Y. , Xie, F. , Liu, X. , and Zhou, Y. , 2014, “ Error Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis of a Parallel Robot With Scara (Selective Compliance Assembly Robot Arm) Motions,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng., 27(4), pp. 693–702. [CrossRef]
Angeles, J. , and Rojas, A. , 1987, “ Manipulator Inverse Kinematics Via Condition-Number Minimization and Continuation,” Int. J. Rob. Autom., 2(2), pp. 61–69.
Campos, A. A. , Guenther, R. , and Martins, D. , 2009, “ Differential Kinematics of Parallel Manipulators Using Assur Virtual Chains,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, 223(7), pp. 1697–1711. [CrossRef]
Davies, T. H. , 1981, “ Kirchhoff's Circulation Law Applied to Multi-Loop Kinematic Chain,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 16(3), pp. 171–173. [CrossRef]
Tsai, L.-W. , 1999, Robot Analysis: The Mechanics of Serial and Parallel Manipulators, Wiley, New York.
Hervé, J. M. , 1994, “ The Mathematical Group Structure of the Set of Displacements,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 29(1), pp. 73–81. [CrossRef]
Meyer, C. D. , 2000, Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA.
Gosselin, C. M. , and Angeles, J. , 1990, “ Singularity Analysis of Closed-Loop Kinematic Chains,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 6(3), pp. 281–290. [CrossRef]
Ma, O. , and Angeles, J. , 1991, “ Architecture Singularities of Platform Manipulators,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, CA, Apr. 9–11, pp. 1542–1547.
Zlatanov, D. , Fenton, R. G. , and Benhabib, B. , 1995, “ A Unifying Framework for Classification and Interpretation of Mechanism Singularities,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 117(4), pp. 566–572. [CrossRef]
Simas, H. , Martins, D. , and Simoni, R. , 2013, “ Uma Classe de Manipuladores Paralelos de Configuração Variável com Autoalinhamento,” Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial (INPI), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Patent No. BR1020130267716.
Simoni, R. , Simas, H. , and Martins, D. , 2014, “ TRIFLEX: Design and Prototyping of a 3-DOF Variable-Configuration Parallel Manipulator With Self-Aligning,” Int. J. Mech. Eng. Autom., 1(2), pp. 77–82.
Simoni, R. , Simas, H. , and Martins, D. , 2013, “ Uma Classe de Manipuladores Paralelos de Configuração Variável,” Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial (INPI), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Patent No. BR102013026774.
Gosselin, C. M. , Kong, X. , Foucault, S. , and Bonev, I. A. , 2004, “ A Fully Decoupled 3-DOF Translational Parallel Mechanism,” 4th Chemnitz Parallel Kinematics Seminar, Parallel Kinematic Machines International Conference, Chemnitz, Germany, pp. 595–610.
Lecours, A. , and Gosselin, C. , 2009, “ Determination of the Workspace of a 3-PRPR Parallel Mechanism for Human-Robot Collaboration,” Trans. Can. Soc. Mech. Eng., 33(4), pp. 609–618.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Graph of a manipulator with general architecture: Vertices and arcs represent links and joints, respectively; Li for i = 1,…,n are the open kinematic chains (legs) that simultaneously connect the platform to the base, whereas Lt is an added virtual kinematic chain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Triflex-II: (a) kinematic scheme and (b) platform's reference points

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Introduction of the geometric errors: (a) PRRU and (b) PRRR legs with geometric errors

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Workspace boundaries: (a) intersection with the xbyb-plane, (b) intersection with the ybzb-plane, (c) intersection with the xbzb-plane, and (d) 3D view (the grayscale indicates the zb value in length unit)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Values of δg,R when Op lies on the boundary surface of the workspace (a), on the plane z = 0 (b), and on the planes z = ±0.75 l.u. (c) for θ3∈[0, π] and θ7∈[0, π] (the curves are the contour lines, and the grayscales indicate the δg,R value)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Values of εg,R when Op lies on the boundary surface of the workspace (a), on the plane z = 0 (b), and on the planes z = ±0.75 l.u. (c) for θ3∈[0, π] and θ7∈[0, π] (the curves are the contour lines, and the grayscales indicate the εg,R value in length unit per radians])

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In