Research Papers

Effects of Load Connection Form on Efficiency and Kinetics of Biped Walking

[+] Author and Article Information
Yuanhao Wu

State Key Laboratory of Tribology,
Beijing Key Lab of Precision/Ultra-Precision
Manufacturing Equipments and Control,
Tsinghua University,
Beijing 100084, China
e-mail: wu-yh14@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn

Ken Chen

State Key Laboratory of Tribology,
Beijing Key Lab of Precision/Ultra-Precision
Manufacturing Equipments and Control,
Tsinghua University,
Beijing 100084, China
e-mail: kenchen@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn

Chenglong Fu

State Key Laboratory of Tribology,
Beijing Key Lab of Precision/Ultra-Precision
Manufacturing Equipments and Control,
Tsinghua University,
Beijing 100084, China
e-mail: fcl@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received February 17, 2016; final manuscript received August 1, 2016; published online September 9, 2016. Assoc. Editor: James Schmiedeler.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 8(6), 061015 (Sep 09, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: JMR-16-1041; doi: 10.1115/1.4034464 History: Received February 17, 2016; Revised August 01, 2016

This paper investigates the influence of the load connection form on the walking energetics and kinetics with simple models. Four load connection forms including rigid connection (RIC), springy connection (SPC), swingy connection (SWC), and springy and swingy connection (SSC) were modeled. The step-to-step transition of periodic walking was studied through an analytical method. The toe-off impulse magnitude and the work done by toe-off were derived. Simulations were performed to study the walking performance of each model and the effect of model parameters on the gait properties. The analysis and simulation results showed that compared with RIC, SPC and SSC can significantly improve the toe-off efficiency and change the ground reaction force (GRF) profile by reducing the burden during the step-to-step transition, which may lead to reduction of walking energy cost. Energetics and kinetics of SWC are closely related to the swing angle of load at the transition moment. The load swing may decrease the walking speed, and it is not beneficial to walking efficiency.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Raibert, M. , Blankespoor, K. , Nelson, G. , Playter, R. , and Team, T. , 2008, “ BigDog, the Rough-Terrain Quadruped Robot,” IFAC Proc., 41(2), pp. 10822–10825. [CrossRef]
Rome, L. C. , Flynn, L. , and Yoo, T. D. , 2006, “ Biomechanics: Rubber Bands Reduce the Cost of Carrying Loads,” Nature, 444(7122), pp. 1023–1024. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rome, L. C. , Flynn, L. , Goldman, E. M. , and Yoo, T. D. , 2005, “ Generating Electricity While Walking With Loads,” Science, 309(5741), pp. 1725–1728. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ackerman, J. , and Seipel, J. , 2013, “ Energy Efficiency of Legged Robot Locomotion With Elastically Suspended Loads,” IEEE Trans. Robotics, 29(2), pp. 321–330. [CrossRef]
Ackerman, J. , and Seipel, J. , 2014, “ A Model of Human Walking Energetics With an Elastically-Suspended Load,” J. Biomech., 47(8), pp. 1922–1927. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kram, R. , 1991, “ Carrying Loads With Springy Poles,” J. Appl. Physiol., 71(3), pp. 1119–1122. [PubMed]
Ackerman, J. , and Seipel, J. , 2011, “ Energetics of Bio-Inspired Legged Robot Locomotion With Elastically-Suspended Loads,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), San Francisco, CA, Sept. 25–30, pp. 203–208.
Kuo, A. D. , 2005, “ Harvesting Energy by Improving the Economy of Human Walking,” Science, 309(5741), pp. 1686–1687. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bruijn, S. M. , Meijer, O. G. , Beek, P. J. , and van Dieën, J. H. , 2010, “ The Effects of Arm Swing on Human Gait Stability,” J. Exp. Biol., 213(23), pp. 3945–3952. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Collins, S. H. , Adamczyk, P. G. , and Kuo, A. D. , 2009, “ Dynamic Arm Swinging in Human Walking,” Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci., 276(1673), pp. 3679–3688. [CrossRef]
Umberger, B. R. , 2008, “ Effects of Suppressing Arm Swing on Kinematics, Kinetics, and Energetics of Human Walking,” J. Biomech., 41(11), pp. 2575–2580. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
McGeer, T. , 1990, “ Passive Dynamic Walking,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 9(2), pp. 62–82. [CrossRef]
Asano, F. , Sogawa, T. , Tamura, K. , and Akutsu, Y. , 2013, “ Passive Dynamic Walking of Rimless Wheel With 2-DOF Wobbling Mass,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 3–8, pp. 3120–3125.
Fu, C. , Wang, J. , Chen, K. , Yu, Z. , and Huang, Q. , 2016, “ A Walking Control Strategy Combining Global Sensory Reflex and Leg Synchronization,” Robotica, 34(05), pp. 973–994. [CrossRef]
Fu, C. , Tan, F. , and Chen, K. , 2010, “ A simple Walking Strategy for Biped Walking Based on an Intermittent Sinusoidal Oscillator,” Robotica, 28(06), pp. 869–884. [CrossRef]
Garcia, M. , Chatterjee, A. , Rulna, A. , and Coleman, M. , 1998, “ The Simplest Walking Model: Stability, Complexity, and Scaling,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 120(2), pp. 281–288. [CrossRef]
Kuo, A. D. , 2002, “ Energetics of Actively Powered Locomotion Using the Simplest Walking Model,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 124(1), pp. 113–120. [CrossRef]
Potwar, K. , Ackerman, J. , and Seipel, J. , 2015, “ Design of Compliant Bamboo Poles for Carrying Loads,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 137(1), p. 011404. [CrossRef]
Levine, D. , Richards, J. , and Whittle, M. W. , 2012, Whittle's Gait Analysis, Churchill Livingstone, London.
Castillo, E. R. , Lieberman, G. M. , McCarty, L. S. , and Lieberman, D. E. , 2014, “ Effects of Pole Compliance and Step Frequency on the Biomechanics and Economy of Pole Carrying During Human Walking,” J. Appl. Physiol., 117(5), pp. 507–517. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kuo, A. D. , Donelan, J. M. , and Ruina, A. , 2005, “ Energetic Consequences of Walking Like an Inverted Pendulum: Step-to-Step Transitions,” Exercise Sport Sci. Rev., 33(2), pp. 88–97. [CrossRef]
Foissac, M. , Millet, G. Y. , Geyssant, A. , Freychat, P. , and Belli, A. , 2009, “ Characterization of the Mechanical Properties of Backpacks and Their Influence on the Energetics of Walking,” J. Biomech., 42(2), pp. 125–130. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kuo, A. D. , 2001, “ A Simple Model of Bipedal Walking Predicts the Preferred Speed-Step Length Relationship,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 123(3), pp. 264–269. [CrossRef]
Alexander, R. M. , 2005, “ Walking Made Simple,” Science, 308(5718), pp. 58–59. [PubMed]
Doke, J. , Donelan, J. M. , and Kuo, A. D. , 2005, “ Mechanics and Energetics of Swinging the Human Leg,” J. Exp. Biol., 208(3), pp. 439–445. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Collins, S. H. , Wiggin, M. B. , and Sawicki, G. S. , 2015, “ Reducing the Energy Cost of Human Walking Using an Unpowered Exoskeleton,” Nature, 522(7555), pp. 212–215. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Powered walking model [17]. Body velocities just before and after the step-to-step transition are perpendicular to trailing leg and leading, respectively. The toe-off impulse P is along the trailing leg and the heel strike impulse I is along the leading leg.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Four loaded walking models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Geometry of toe-off and body mechanics during step-to-step transition for loaded powered walking models. (a) RIC model: vb− and vb+ are perpendicular to the trailing leg and the leading leg, respectively, and their magnitudes should be equal. (b) SPC model: As the spring force is limited, spring can isolate the impulse between the load and the body during instantaneous transition. (c) SWC model: The tensile force of rigid cord could be infinite and the force only exists along the cord direction. In this model, magnitudes of P and I could be not equal for periodic walking. (d) SSC model: The SSC model can be regarded as a RIC model with a massless load during the step-to-step transition.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

‖P‖/‖P0‖ and ‖I‖/‖I0‖ versus swing angle of load q4, where ‖P0‖ and ‖I0‖ are the magnitude of toe-off and heel strike impulse, respectively, when q4 = 0. By fixing vb− and mass ratio (Ml=40%Mb), this figure shows ‖P‖ will decrease while ‖I‖ will increase as q4 increases: (a) ‖P‖/‖P0‖ versus swing angle of load q4 and (b) ‖I‖/‖I0‖ versus swing angle of load q4.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effects of spring stiffness k on gait properties of the SPC model when Mb = 75 kg, Ml = 30 kg, α = 0.35 rad, and v = 1.4 m/s: (a) fspring/fw versus k, (b) COT versus spring stiffness k, and (c) vibration amplitude q4 versus spring stiffness k

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effects of cord length S on gait properties of the SWC model when Mb = 75 kg, Ml = 30 kg, α = 0.35 rad, and v = 1.4 m/s: (a) fpendulum/fw versus S, (b) COT versus S, and (c) maximal horizontal load displacement Ah versus S

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

COT of each model with k = 1500 N/m, c = 10 Nm/s, and S = 0.5 m. As the walking speed v or half step angle α increases, COT increases for all models: (a) COT versus average walking speed v with α = 0.35 rad and (b) COT versus average walking speed v with preferred α.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Angular velocity of stance leg q˙1 versus stance leg angle q1 in a gait cycle with α = 0.35 rad and v = 1 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

GRF and load force during the single stance phase, when v = 1.4 m/s and α = 0.3 rad: (a) GRF in the single stance phase and (b) load force in the single stance phase




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In