0
Research Papers

Novel Design and Three-Dimensional Printing of Variable Stiffness Robotic Grippers

[+] Author and Article Information
Yang Yang

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Hong Kong,
Hong Kong 999077, China
e-mail: meyang@hku.hk

Yonghua Chen

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Hong Kong,
Hong Kong 999077, China
e-mail: yhchen@hku.hk

Ying Wei

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Hong Kong,
Hong Kong 999077, China
e-mail: u3001913@hku.hk

Yingtian Li

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Hong Kong,
Hong Kong 999077, China
e-mail: liyingtiantj@gmail.com

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received September 30, 2015; final manuscript received May 9, 2016; published online September 8, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Satyandra K. Gupta.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 8(6), 061010 (Sep 08, 2016) (15 pages) Paper No: JMR-15-1286; doi: 10.1115/1.4033728 History: Received September 30, 2015; Revised May 09, 2016

In this paper, a novel robotic gripper design with variable stiffness is proposed and fabricated using a modified additive manufacturing (hereafter called 3D printing) process. The gripper is composed of two identical robotic fingers and each finger has three rotational degrees-of-freedom as inspired by human fingers. The finger design is composed of two materials: acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) for the bone segments and shape-memory polymer (SMP) for the finger joints. When the SMP joints are exposed to thermal energy and heated to above their glass transition temperature (Tg), the finger joints exhibit very small stiffness, thus allow easy bending by an external force. When there is no bending force, the finger will restore to its original shape thanks to SMP's shape recovering stress. The finger design is actuated by a pneumatics soft actuator. Fabrication of the proposed robotic finger is made possible by a modified 3D printing process. An analytical model is developed to represent the relationship between the soft actuator's air pressure and the finger's deflection angle. Furthermore, analytical modeling of the finger stiffness modulation is presented. Several experiments are conducted to validate the analytical models.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Zhou, X. , Majidi, C. , and O'Reilly, O. M. , 2015, “ Soft Hands: An Analysis of Some Gripping Mechanisms in Soft Robot Design,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 64, pp. 155–165. [CrossRef]
Cha, H. J. , Koh, K. C. , and Yi, B. J. , 2014, “ Stiffness Modeling of a Soft Finger,” Int. J. Control, Autom. Syst., 12(1), pp. 111–117. [CrossRef]
Nagase, J. Y. , Wakimoto, S. , Satoh, T. , Saga, N. , and Suzumori, K. , 2011, “ Design of a Variable-Stiffness Robotic Hand Using Pneumatic Soft Rubber Actuators,” Smart Mater. Struct., 20(10), p. 105015. [CrossRef]
Brown, E. , Rodenberg, N. , Amend, J. , Mozeika, A. , Steltz, E. , Zakin, M. R. , and Jaeger, H. M. , 2010, “ Universal Robotic Gripper Based on the Jamming of Granular Material,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 107(44), pp. 18809–18814. [CrossRef]
Jiang, A. , Aste, T. , Dasgupta, P. , Althoefer, K. , and Nanayakkara, T. , 2013, “ Granular Jamming Transitions for a Robotic Mechanism,” AIP Conf. Proc. 1542(1), pp. 385–388.
Kim, Y. J. , Cheng, S. , Kim, S. , and Iagnemma, K. , 2013, “ A Novel Layer Jamming Mechanism With Tunable Stiffness Capability for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 29(4), pp. 1031–1042. [CrossRef]
Majidi, C. , and Wood, R. J. , 2010, “ Tunable Elastic Stiffness With Microconfined Magnetorheological Domains at Low Magnetic Field,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 97(16), p. 164104. [CrossRef]
Wang, M. , and Fei, R. , 1999, “ Improvement of Machining Stability Using a Tunable Stiffness Boring Bar Containing an Electrorheological Fluid,” Smart Mater. Struct., 8(4), p. 511. [CrossRef]
Petit, F. , Friedl, W. , Hoppner, H. , and Grebenstein, M. , 2015, “ Analysis and Synthesis of the Bidirectional Antagonistic Variable Stiffness Mechanism,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 20(2), pp. 684–695. [CrossRef]
Henke, M. , Sorber, J. , and Gerlach, G. , 2013, “ EAP-Actuators With Improved Actuation Capabilities for Construction Elements With Controllable Stiffness,” Adv. Sci. Technol., 79, pp. 75–80. [CrossRef]
Clark, W. W. , Brigham, J. C. , Mo, C. , and Joshi, S. , 2010, “ Modeling of a High-Deformation Shape Memory Polymer Locking Link,” Proc. SPIE, 7645, p. 764507.
Shan, W. , Lu, T. , and Majidi, C. , 2013, “ Soft-Matter Composites With Electrically Tunable Elastic Rigidity,” Smart Mater. Struct., 22(8), p. 085005. [CrossRef]
Schubert, B. E. , and Floreano, D. , 2013, “ Variable Stiffness Material Based on Rigid Low-Melting-Point-Alloy Microstructures Embedded in Soft Poly (Dimethylsiloxane)(PDMS),” RSC Adv., 3(46), pp. 24671–24679. [CrossRef]
Behl, M. , and Lendlein, A. , 2007, “ Shape-Memory Polymers,” Mater. Today, 10(4), pp. 20–28. [CrossRef]
Takashima, K. , Zhang, N. , Mukai, T. , and Guo, S. , 2010, “ Fundamental Study of a Position-Keeping Module Using a Shape-Memory Polymer,” J. Rob. Soc. Jpn., 28(7), pp. 905–912. [CrossRef]
Liu, C. , Qin, H. , and Mather, P. T. , 2007, “ Review of Progress in Shape-Memory Polymers,” J. Mater. Chem., 17(16), pp. 1543–1558. [CrossRef]
Takashima, K. , Sugitani, K. , Morimoto, N. , Sakaguchi, S. , Noritsugu, T. , and Mukai, T. , 2014, “ Pneumatic Artificial Rubber Muscle Using Shape-Memory Polymer Sheet With Embedded Electrical Heating Wire,” Smart Mater. Struct., 23(12), p. 125005. [CrossRef]
Koerner, H. , Price, G. , Pearce, N. A. , Alexander, M. , and Vaia, R. A. , 2004, “ Remotely Actuated Polymer Nanocomposites—Stress-Recovery of Carbon-Nanotube-Filled Thermoplastic Elastomers,” Nat. Mater., 3(2), pp. 115–120. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Leng, J. , Wu, X. , and Liu, Y. , 2009, “ Infrared Light-Active Shape Memory Polymer Filled With Nanocarbon Particles,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 114(4), pp. 2455–2460. [CrossRef]
Cho, J. W. , Kim, J. W. , Jung, Y. C. , and Goo, N. S. , 2005, “ Electroactive Shape-Memory Polyurethane Composites Incorporating Carbon Nanotubes,” Macromol. Rapid Commun., 26(5), pp. 412–416. [CrossRef]
Schmidt, A. M. , 2006, “ Electromagnetic Activation of Shape Memory Polymer Networks Containing Magnetic Nanoparticles,” Macromol. Rapid Commun., 27(14), pp. 1168–1172. [CrossRef]
Yang, Y. , Chen, Y. H. , Wei, Y. , and Li, Y. T. , 2015, “ 3D Printing of Shape Memory Polymer for Functional Part Fabrication,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 84(9), pp. 2079–2095.
McEvoy, M. A. , and Correll, N. , 2014, “ Thermoplastic Variable Stiffness Composites With Embedded, Networked Sensing, Actuation, and Control,” J. Compos. Mater., 49(15), pp. 1799–1808. [CrossRef]
Shan, W. , Diller, S. , Tutcuoglu, A. , and Majidi, C. , 2015, “ Rigidity-Tuning Conductive Elastomer,” Smart Mater. Struct., 24(6), p. 065001. [CrossRef]
Rousseau, I. A. , 2008, “ Challenges of Shape Memory Polymers: A Review of the Progress Toward Overcoming SMP's Limitations,” Polym. Eng. Sci., 48(11), p. 2075. [CrossRef]
Mattar, E. , 2013, “ A Survey of Bio-Inspired Robotics Hands Implementation: New Directions in Dexterous Manipulation,” Rob. Auton. Syst., 61(5), pp. 517–544. [CrossRef]
Galloway, K. C. , Polygerinos, P. , Walsh, C. J. , and Wood, R. J. , 2013, “ Mechanically Programmable Bend Radius for Fiber-Reinforced Soft Actuators,” 16th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), Montevideo, Uruguay, Nov. 25–29, pp. 1–6.
Polygerinos, P. , Wang, Z. , Galloway, K. C. , Wood, R. J. , and Walsh, C. J. , 2015, “ Soft Robotic Glove for Combined Assistance and At-Home Rehabilitation,” Rob. Auton. Syst., 73, pp. 135–143. [CrossRef]
Jonsson, U. , Lindahl, O. , and Andersson, B. , 2014, “ Modeling the High-Frequency Complex Modulus of Silicone Rubber Using Standing Lamb Waves and an Inverse Finite Element Method,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelectr., Freq. Control, 61(12), pp. 2106–2120. [CrossRef]
Eskandari, H. , Salcudean, S. E. , Rohling, R. , and Ohayon, J. , 2008, “ Viscoelastic Characterization of Soft Tissue From Dynamic Finite Element Models,” Phys. Med. Biol., 53(22), p. 6569. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Udupa, G. , Sreedharan, P. , Dinesh, P. S. , and Kim, D. , 2014, “ Asymmetric Bellow Flexible Pneumatic Actuator for Miniature Robotic Soft Gripper,” J. Rob., 2014, p. 902625.
Firouzeh, A. , Salerno, M. , and Paik, J. , 2015, “ Soft Pneumatic Actuator With Adjustable Stiffness Layers for Multi-DoF Actuation,” 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany, Sept. 28–Oct. 2, pp. 1117–1124.
Udupa, G. , Sreedharan, P. , and Aditya, K. , 2010, “ Robotic Gripper Driven by Flexible Microactuator Based on an Innovative Technique,” IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO), Seoul, Korea, Oct. 6–28, pp. 111–116.
Tobushi, H. , Okumura, K. , Hayashi, S. , and Ito, N. , 2001, “ Thermomechanical Constitutive Model of Shape Memory Polymer,” Mech. Mater., 33(10), pp. 545–554. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The variable stiffness finger design: (a) the human index finger, (b) schematic showing human finger's internal structure, and (c) components of the designed finger

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Interlock features of the finger joint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Change of elastic modulus in shape-memory polymers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic diagram of the finger design's motion: (a) initial position, (b) bending motion, and (c) restored position

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Shape change of the finger design

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Change of the maximum deflection angle Θmax: (a) variation of Θmax with different maximum extension length of L, (b) variation of Θmax with the change of l0, and (c) variation of Θmax with the change of D

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Three-dimensional printing process of gripper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Manufactured gripper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Soft actuator design: (a) side view and (b) cross-sectional view (dimension unit: mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Schematic of soft actuator working principle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Three-dimensional printed mold and manufactured soft actuator: (a) top-half mold, (b) bottom-half mold, (c) long rod with different diameters as the core, and (d) fabricated soft actuator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Pressure (p)–deflection (θ) relationship of soft actuator: (a) initial position, p = 0 kPa, (b) p = 100 kPa, (c) p = 125 kPa, (d) p = 150 kPa, (e) p = 175 kPa, and (f) p = 200 kPa

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Approximate line showing relationship between SMP's elastic modulus and temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Bending analysis of a module subjected to pressure p

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Inflation of soft actuator (cross section): (a) primary shape and (b) inflated shape

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

The contact area of SMP and silicone rubber

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Simplified model for analyzing crease SMP part extension

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Finger stiffness modulation: (a) deflection of the finger under applied force Fs, (b) torque applied to joint i, (c) approximation of the joint using a cantilever beam, and (d) cross section of approximated cantilever beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Finger stiffness variation with temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Schematic diagram for bending angle testing of the finger

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

The actual experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Pressure (p) versus deflection angle (Θ) for the finger

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Schematic showing experimental principle of stiffness test setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Experimental setup for measuring finger stiffness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Comparison of force–deflection at different temperatures (p = 0)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 26

Comparison of force–deflection at different temperatures (p = 125 kPa)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 27

Comparison of force–deflection relationship, with different air pressures p

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 28

Comparison of finger stiffness between theoretical modeling and experimental measurement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 29

Grasping experiments: (a) primary position of the gripper, (b) grasp a bottle with air on and T > Tg, (c) bottle drop when air off, (d) grasp a bottle with air on and T > Tg, and (e) cool down below Tg and off the air, bottle is still hold tight

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In