0
Research Papers

A Novel Joint Design for Robotic Hands With Humanlike Nonlinear Compliance

[+] Author and Article Information
Pei-Hsin Kuo

ReNeu Robotics Laboratory,
Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Texas,
Austin, TX 78712
e-mail: peihsin.kuo@utexas.edu

Ashish D. Deshpande

ReNeu Robotics Laboratory,
Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Texas,
Austin, TX 78712
e-mail: ashish@austin.utexas.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received December 6, 2014; final manuscript received July 31, 2015; published online November 24, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Marcia K. O'Malley.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 8(2), 021004 (Nov 24, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: JMR-14-1335; doi: 10.1115/1.4031300 History: Received December 06, 2014; Revised July 31, 2015; Accepted August 08, 2015

Robotic hands are typically too rigid to react against unexpected impacts and disturbances in order to prevent damage. Human hands have great versatility and robustness due, in part, to the passive compliance at the hand joints. In this paper, we present a novel design for joint with passive compliance that is inspired by biomechanical properties of the human hands. The design consists of a compliant material and a set of pulleys that rotate and stretch the material as the joint rotates. We created six different compliant materials, and we optimized the joint design to match the desired humanlike compliance. We present two design features that allow for the tuning of the joint torque profile, namely, a pretension mechanism to increase pretension of the compliant material, and a design of varying pulley configuration. We built a prototype for the new joint by using additive manufacturing to fabricate the design components and built a test-bed with a force sensor and a servo motor. Experimental results show that the joint exhibits a nonlinear, double exponential joint compliance with all six compliant materials. The design feature involving variable pulley configurations is effective in adjusting the slope of joint torque during the joint rotation while the pretension mechanism showed only a limited effect on increasing the torque amplitude. Overall, with its small size, light weight, low friction, and humanlike joint compliance, the presented joint design is ready for implementation in robotic hands.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Topics: Torque , Design , Pulleys , Robotics
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Kuo, P.-H. , and Deshpande, A. D. , 2012, “ Muscle-Tendon Units Provide Limited Contributions to the Passive Stiffness of the Index Finger Metacarpophalangeal Joint,” J. Biomech., 45(15), pp. 2531–2538. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Haddadin, S. , Schäffer, A. , and Hirzinger, G. , 2007, “ Safety Evaluation of Physical Human-Robot Interaction Via Crash-Testing,” Robotics: Science and Systems Conference (RSS2007), Atlanta, GA, June 27–30, pp. 217–224.
Accoto, D. , Tagliamonte, N. L. , Carpino, G. , Sergi, F. , Di Palo, M. , and Guglielmelli, E. , 2012, “ pVEJ: A Modular Passive Viscoelastic Joint for Assistive Wearable Robots,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Saint Paul, MN, May 14–18,, pp. 3361–3366.
Carpino, G. , Accoto, D. , Di Palo, M. , Tagliamonte, N. , Sergi, F. , and Guglielmelli, E. , 2011, “ Design of a Rotary Passive Viscoelastic Joint for Wearable Robots,” IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Zurich, Switzerland, June 29–July 1, pp. 1–6.
English, C. , and Russell, D. , 1999, “ Implementation of Variable Joint Stiffness Through Antagonistic Actuation Using Rolamite Springs,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 34(1), pp. 27–40. [CrossRef]
Laffranchi, M. , Tsagarakis, N. , and Caldwell, D. , 2011, “ A Compact Compliant Actuator (Compact) With Variable Physical Damping,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Shanghai, China, May 9–13, pp. 4644–4650.
Migliore, S. A. , Brown, E. A. , and DeWeerth, S. P. , 2005, “ Biologically Inspired Joint Stiffness Control,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Apr. 18–22, pp. 4508–4513.
Eiberger, O. , Haddadin, S. , Weis, M. , Albu-Schaffer, A. , and Hirzinger, G. , 2010, “ On Joint Design With Intrinsic Variable Compliance: Derivation of the DLR QA-Joint,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Anchorage, AK, May 3–7, pp. 1687–1694.
Wolf, S. , and Hirzinger, G. , 2008, “ A New Variable Stiffness Design: Matching Requirements of the Next Robot Generation,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Pasadena, CA, May 19–23, pp. 1741–1746.
Albu-Schaffer, A. , Eiberger, O. , Grebenstein, M. , Haddadin, S. , Ott, C. , Wimbock, T. , Wolf, S. , and Hirzinger, G. , 2008, “ Soft Robotics,” IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag., 15(3), pp. 20–30. [CrossRef]
Grebenstein, M. , and van der Smagt, P. , 2008, “ Antagonism for a Highly Anthropomorphic Hand–Arm System,” Adv. Rob., 22(1), pp. 39–55. [CrossRef]
Jafari, A. , Tsagarakis, N. , Sardellitti, I. , and Caldwell, D. , 2012, “ How Design Can Affect the Energy Required to Regulate the Stiffness in Variable Stiffness Actuators,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Saint Paul, MN, May 14–18, pp. 2792–2797.
Pratt, G. A. , and Williamson, M. M. , 1995, “ Series Elastic Actuators,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference of Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Pittsburgh, PA, Aug. 5–9, Vol. 1, pp. 399–406.
Ham, R. V. , Sugar, T. , Vanderborght, B. , Hollander, K. , and Lefeber, D. , 2009, “ Compliant Actuator Designs,” IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag., 16(3), pp. 81–94. [CrossRef]
González Rodríguez, A. , Chacón, J. , Donoso, A. , and González Rodríguez, A. , 2011, “ Design of an Adjustable-Stiffness Spring: Mathematical Modeling and Simulation, Fabrication and Experimental Validation,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 46(12), pp. 1970–1979. [CrossRef]
Berselli, G. , Guerra, A. , Vassura, G. , and Andrisano, A. O. , 2014, “ An Engineering Method for Comparing Selectively Compliant Joints in Robotic Structures,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 19(6), pp. 1882–1895. [CrossRef]
Melchiorri, C. , Palli, G. , Berselli, G. , and Vassura, G. , 2013, “ Development of the UB Hand IV: Overview of Design Solutions and Enabling Technologies,” IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag., 20(3), pp. 72–81. [CrossRef]
Berselli, G. , Piccinini, M. , and Vassura, G. , 2011, “ Comparative Evaluation of the Selective Compliance in Elastic Joints for Robotic Structures,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Shanghai, China, May 9–13, pp. 4626–4631.
Gaiser, I. N. , Pylatiuk, C. , Schulz, S. , Kargov, A. , Oberle, R. , and Werner, T. , 2009, “ The Fluidhand III: A Multifunctional Prosthetic Hand,” JPO: J. Prosthetics and Orthotics, 21(2), pp. 91–96. [CrossRef]
Connolly, C. , 2008, “ Prosthetic Hands From Touch Bionics,” Ind. Rob.—Int. J., 35(4), pp. 290–293. [CrossRef]
Odhner, L. U. , Jentoft, L. P. , Claffee, M. R. , Corson, N. , Tenzer, Y. , Ma, R. R. , Buehler, M. , Kohout, R. , Howe, R. D. , and Dollar, A. M. , 2014, “ A Compliant, Underactuated Hand for Robust Manipulation,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 33(5), pp. 736–752. [CrossRef]
Dollar, A. M. , and Howe, R. D. , 2010, “ The Highly Adaptive SDM Hand: Design and Performance Evaluation,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 29(5), pp. 585–597. [CrossRef]
Xu, Z. , Kumar, V. , Matsuoka, Y. , and Todorov, E. , 2012, “ Design of an Anthropomorphic Robotic Finger System With Biomimetic Artificial Joints,” 4th IEEE, RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), Rome, Italy, June 24–27, pp. 568–574.
Schepelmann, A. , Geberth, K. A. , and Geyer, H. , 2014, “ Compact Nonlinear Springs With User Defined Torque-Deflection Profiles for Series Elastic Actuators,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, May 30–June 7, pp. 3411–3416.
Pfeifer, R. , Lungarella, M. , and Iida, F. , 2012, “ The Challenges Ahead for Bio-Inspired ‘Soft’ Robotics,” Commun. ACM, 55(11), pp. 76–87. [CrossRef]
Lantada, A. D. , and Morgado, P. L. , 2012, “ Rapid Prototyping for Biomedical Engineering: Current Capabilities and Challenges,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 14, pp. 73–96. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cutkosky, M. R. , and Kim, S. , 2009, “ Design and Fabrication of Multi-Material Structures for Bio-Inspired Robots,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 367(1894), pp. 1799–1813. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

A schematic diagram of the rotated joint configuration and geometrical representations for 180 deg joint rotation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Results from optimization of design variables and parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The underlying configuration for variable stiffness with the compliant materials at the initial position θd=0 deg (a), and at the joint angle θd=90 deg (b). The curved arrows show that the pulleys rotated about the center of the joint.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

A schematic diagram of off-center pulley and its new geometrical parameters due to the rotation in counterclockwise direction. The pulley is rotated about the off-center C with the angle θr, causing a change of geometrical engagement between the pulley and the material such that the new center of pulley (O′), radius (R′), and the distance R′ change the effective MA.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Experimental joint torque results of tuning pulley angle and rotating direction. The basic configuration is the original pulley configuration without changing the angles.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Five pulley configurations to modify the MA and hence the passive torque profile in the joint design

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The components of parallel compliant joint design and the computer-aided design. Over 21 parts of the design are fabricated by a 3D printer.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

A prototype of parallel compliant joint mechanism. Subsystems such as compliant material, variable pulley configuration, and pretension mechanism are shown in subfigures. The dimension of the joint mechanism is 25.46×23.18 mm (diameter × thickness) and weight is 5.34 g.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The stress–strain curves of six materials during the tensile test. The curves and their error bars represent the mean values and standard deviations of five specimens for each material.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The experimental results of joint torque due to different pretensions on the compliant material. The embedded figures show that the pretension mechanism is moved to different positions.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The joint torque responses from the harmonic test with different cyclic frequencies for three S series applied materials

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In