0
Research Papers

Rapid Manufacture of Novel Variable Impedance Robots

[+] Author and Article Information
Alexander Enoch

Institute of Perception,
Action and Behaviour,
School of Informatics,
University of Edinburgh,
Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK
e-mail: a.m.enoch@sms.ed.ac.uk

Sethu Vijayakumar

Institute of Perception,
Action and Behaviour,
School of Informatics,
University of Edinburgh,
Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK
e-mail: sethu.vijayakumar@ed.ac.uk

Manuscript received August 1, 2014; final manuscript received April 8, 2015; published online August 18, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Aaron M. Dollar.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 8(1), 011003 (Aug 18, 2015) (11 pages) Paper No: JMR-14-1190; doi: 10.1115/1.4030388 History: Received August 01, 2014

Variable stiffness and variable damping can play an important role in robot movement, particularly for legged robots such as bipedal walkers. Variable impedance also introduces new control problems, since there are more degrees of freedom to control, and the resulting robot has more complex dynamics. In this paper, we introduce novel design and fabrication methodologies that are capable of producing cost effective hardware prototypes suitable for investigating the efficacy of impedance modulation. We present two variable impedance bipedal platforms produced using a combination of waterjet cutting and 3D printing, and a novel fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing based method for producing hybrid plastic/metal parts. We evaluate walking trajectories at different speeds and stiffness levels.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Collins, S. , Ruina, A. , Tedrake, R. , and Wisse, M. , 2005, “Efficient Bipedal Robots Based on Passive-Dynamic Walkers,” Science, 307(5712), pp. 1082–1085. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pratt, J. , 2000, “Exploiting Inherent Robustness and Natural Dynamics in the Control of Bipedal Walking Robots,” Ph.D. thesis, Computer Science Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Braun, D. , Petit, F. , Huber, F. , Haddadin, S. , van der Smagt, P. , Albu-Schaffer, A. , and Vijayakumar, S. , 2013, “Robots Driven by Compliant Actuators: Optimal Control Under Actuation Constraints,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 29(5), pp. 1085–1101. [CrossRef]
Howard, M. , Braun, D. , and Vijayakumar, S. , 2013, “Transferring Human Impedance Behavior to Heterogeneous Variable Impedance Actuators,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 29(4), pp. 847–862. [CrossRef]
Braun, D. , Howard, M. , and Vijayakumar, S. , 2012, “Optimal Variable Stiffness Control: Formulation and Application to Explosive Movement Tasks,” Auton. Robots, 33(3), pp. 237–253. [CrossRef]
Radulescu, A. , Howard, M. , Braun, D. , and Vijayakumar, S. , 2012, “Exploiting Variable Physical Damping in Rapid Movement Tasks,” IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM 2012), Kachsiung, Taiwan, July 11–14, pp. 141–148.
Nakanishi, J. , Radulescu, A. , and Vijayakumar, S. , 2013, “Spatio-Temporal Optimization of Multi-Phase Movements: Dealing With Contacts and Switching Dynamics,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2013), Tokyo, Nov. 3–7, pp. 5100–5107.
Vanderborght, B. , Albu-Schäffer, A. , Bicchi, A. , Burdet, E. , Caldwell, D. G. , Carloni, R. , Catalano, M. , Eiberger, O. , Friedl, W. , Ganesh, G. , Garabini, G. , Grebenstein, M. , Grioli, G. , Haddadin, S. , Hoppner, H. , Jafari, A. , Laffranchi, M. , Lefeber, D. , Petit, F. , Stramigioli, S. , Tsagarakis, N. , Van Damme, M. , Van Ham, R. , Visser, L. C. , and Wolf, S. , 2013, “Variable Impedance Actuators: A Review,” Rob. Auton. Syst., 61(12), pp. 1601–1614. [CrossRef]
Enoch, A. , Sutas, A. , Nakaoka, S. , and Vijayakumar, S. , 2012, “BLUE: A Bipedal Robot With Variable Stiffness and Damping,” 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2012), Osaka, Japan, Nov. 29–Dec. 1, pp. 487–494.
Mitrovic, D. , Klanke, S. , Howard, M. , and Vijayakumar, S. , 2010, “Exploiting Sensorimotor Stochasticity for Learning Control of Variable Impedance Actuators,” 10th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2010), Nashville, TN, Dec. 6–8, pp. 536–541.
Van Ham, R. , Vanderborght, B. , Van Damme, M. , Verrelse, B. , and Lefeber, D. , 2007, “MACCEPA, the Mechanically Adjustable Compliance and Controllable Equilibrium Position Actuator: Design and Implementation in a Biped Robot,” Rob. Auton. Syst., 55(10), pp. 761–768. [CrossRef]
Jafari, A. , Tsagarakis, N. G. , Vanderborght, B. , and Caldwell, D. G. , 2010, “A Novel Actuator With Adjustable Stiffness (AwAS),” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Taipei, Taiwan, Oct. 18–22, pp. 4201–4206.
Jafari, A. , Tsagarakis, N. G. , and Caldwell, D. G. , 2011, “AwAS-II: A New Actuator With Adjustable Stiffness Based on the Novel Principle of Adaptable Pivot Point and Variable Lever Ratio,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Shanghai, May 9–13, pp. 4638–4643.
Morita, T. , and Sugano, S. , 1995, “Design and Development of a New Robot Joint Using a Mechanical Impedance Adjuster,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Nagoya, Japan, May 21–27, pp. 2469–2475.
Morita, T. , and Sugano, S. , 1995, “Development of One-DOF Robot Arm Equipped With Mechanical Impedance Adjuster,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Pittsburgh, PA, Aug. 5–9, pp. 407–412.
Choi, J. , Park, S. , Lee, W. , and Kang, S. , 2008, “Design of a Robot Joint With Variable Stiffness,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2008), Pasadena, CA, May 19–23, pp. 1760–1765.
Tsagarakis, N. , Sardellitti, I. , and Caldwell, D. , 2011, “A New Variable Stiffness Actuator (Compact-VSA): Design and Modelling,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2011), San Francisco, CA, Sept. 25–30, pp. 378–383.
Wolf, S. , and Hirzinger, G. , 2008, “A New Variable Stiffness Design: Matching Requirements of the Next Robot Generation,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (IROS), San Francisco, CA, Sept. 25–30, pp. 1741–1746.
Uemura, M. , and Kawamura, S. , 2010, “A New Mechanical Structure for Adjustable Stiffness Devices With Lightweight and Small Size,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2010), Taipei, Taiwan, Oct. 18–22, pp. 2364–2369.
Choi, J. , Hong, S. , Lee, W. , Kang, S. , and Kim, M. , 2011, “A Robot Joint With Variable Stiffness Using Leaf Springs,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 27(2), pp. 229–238. [CrossRef]
Petit, F. , Chalon, M. , Friedl, W. , Grebenstein, M. , Schaffer, A. , and Hirzinger, G. , 2010, “Bidirectional Antagonistic Variable Stiffness Actuation: Analysis, Design & Implementation,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2010), Anchorage, AK, May 3–7, pp. 4189–4196.
Laurin-Kovitz, K. , Colgate, J. , and Carnes, S. , 1991, “Design of Components for Programmable Passive Impedance,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Sacramento, CA, Apr. 9–11, pp. 1476–1481.
Laffranchi, M. , Tsagarakis, N. G. , Caldwell, D. G. , and Sheffield, W. B. , 2010, “A Variable Physical Damping Actuator (VPDA) for Compliant Robotic Joints,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Anchorage, AK, May 3–7, pp. 1668–1674.
Herr, H. , and Wilkenfeld, A. , 2003, “User-Adaptive Control of a Magnetorheological Prosthetic Knee,” Ind. Robot, 30(1), pp. 42–55. [CrossRef]
Umberger, B. R. , and Martin, P. E. , 2007, “Mechanical Power and Efficiency of Level Walking With Different Stride Rates,” J. Exp. Biol., 210(Pt 18), pp. 3255–3265. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ker, R. , Bennett, M. , Bibby, S. , and Kester, R. , 1987, “The Spring in the Arch of the Human Foot,” Nature, 325(6100), pp. 147–149. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gefen, A. , 2003, “The In Vivo Elastic Properties of the Plantar Fascia During the Contact Phase of Walking,” Foot Ankle Int., 24(3), pp. 238–244. [PubMed]
Kappel-Bargas, A. , Woolf, R. D. , Cornwall, M. W. , and McPoil, T. G. , 1998, “The Windlass Mechanism During Normal Walking and Passive First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Extension,” Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon), 13(3), pp. 190–194. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Coppelia Robotics, 2013, “V-rep,” Coppelia Robotics GmbH, Zurich, Switzerland, http://coppeliarobotics.com/

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

BLUE and miniBLUE, robots capable of mechanically varying the dynamics of their joints, and 3D printed part with waterjet cut aluminum embedded inside during printing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of the variable stiffness transmission. The motor attached to the input link drives the intermediate arm which, through a pair of compression springs, delivers torque to the output link. A second motor adjusts the position of the compression springs, and hence the distance r in order to change the stiffness.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Torque and stiffness curves for the variable stiffness mechanism in the knees and ankles of BLUE

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

BLUE: a planar biped

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) miniBLUE: a biped with 2DOF hips and torso; (b) a variable stiffness pod which attaches to the side of miniBLUE, forming the series elastic element in the drive. A motor on the pod drives the central leadscrew, adjusting the position of the load bearing springs and thereby changing the joint stiffness; and (c) miniBLUE joint architecture: damping motor connectivity in parallel with variable stiffness pod.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Design and evaluation of the compliant feet of miniBLUE: (a) miniBLUE's foot, (b) FEA of miniBLUE foot arch, and (c) simulated and measured deflection of the arch

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Design and evaluation of the 3D printed compliant arch in the foot of BLUE: (a) BLUE's foot with 3D printed arch, (b) FEA of BLUE foot arch, and (c) simulated and measured deflection of the arch

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

FDM printing of hybrid part, encasing waterjet cut aluminum: (a) before first metal piece, (b) after first metal piece, (c) channel for sensor and recess for crossbar, and (d) all metal pieces in place

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The electronics layout of BLUE. Modular control boards linked via Ethernet network.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Peak ground reaction forces (GFR) on the phalanges of the foot versus longitudinal arch stiffness, for three different walking gaits. Generally, a softer arch reduces peak GRF on the toes.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Walking trajectory playback on the robot, both in simulation and on the actual hardware. (a) Simulation and (b) BLUE.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Joint angles, equilibrium angles, stiffness setting, and deflection from equilibrium in the knee joint of BLUE during squatting: (a) simulation of squatting while changing stiffness and (b) hardware squatting while changing stiffness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Tuning the behavior of the robot to conform more closely to a desired output trajectory. Over three iterations, the output of the robot is pushed toward the desired result with a proportional gain.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Walking at a different stiffness levels, for two different speeds. (a) At very slow speeds, the task effectively becomes point-to-point motion, and we observe a higher energy usage in the robot at lower stiffness levels. (b) At faster speeds, decreasing the stiffness level can decrease energy usage.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In