Research Papers

Rational Interpolation of Car Motions

[+] Author and Article Information
J. M. Selig

School of Engineering,
London South Bank University,
London SE1 0AA, UK
e-mail: seligjm@lsbu.ac.uk

Manuscript received August 28, 2013; final manuscript received March 16, 2015; published online June 24, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Qiaode Jeffrey Ge.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 7(3), 031023 (Aug 01, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: JMR-13-1167; doi: 10.1115/1.4030298 History: Received August 28, 2013; Revised March 16, 2015; Online June 24, 2015

This work introduces a general approach to the interpolation of the rigid-body motions of cars by rational motions. A key feature of the approach is that the motions produced automatically satisfy the kinematic constraints imposed by the car wheels, that is, cars cannot instantaneously translate sideways. This is achieved by using a Cayley map to project a polynomial curve in the Lie algebra se(2) to SE(2) the group of rigid displacements in the plane. The differential constraint on se(2), which expresses the kinematic constraint on the car, is easily solved for one coordinate if the other two are given, in this case as polynomial functions. In this way, families of motions obeying the constraint can be found. Several families are found here and examples of their use are shown. It is shown how rest-to-rest motions can be generated in this way and also how these motions can be joined so that the motion is continuous and differentiable across the join. A final section discusses the optimization of these motions. For some cost functions, the optimal motions are known but can be rather impractical to use. By optimizing over a family of motions which satisfy the boundary conditions for the motion, it is shown that rational motions can be found simply and are close to the overall optimal motion.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Schwartz, J. T., and Sharir, M., 1986, “Motion Planning and Related Geometrical Algorithms in Robotics,” International Congress of Mathematicians, Berkeley, CA, Aug. 3-11, pp. 1594–1611.
Likhachev, M., Ferguson, D., Gordon, G., Stentz, A., and Thrun, S., 2005, “Anytime Dynamic A*: An Anytime, Replanning Algorithm,” 15th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2005), Monterey, CA, June 5–10, pp. 262–271.
Hart, P. E., Nilsson, N. J., and Raphael, B., 1968, “A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern., 4(2), pp. 100–107. [CrossRef]
Khatib, O., 1986, “Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 5(1), pp. 90–98. [CrossRef]
Latombe, J.-C., 1991, Robot Motion Planning, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
Murray, R. M., Li, Z., and Sastry, S. S., 1994, A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Laumond, J. P., 1998, “Nonholonomic Motion Planning for Mobile Robots,” Laboratory for Analysis and Architecture of Systems–French National Centre for Scientific Research (LAAS-CNRS), Toulouse, France, last accessed Aug. 29, 2014, http://www.dis.uniroma1.it/~oriolo/eir/jpl/NonholonomicMotionPlanning_LAAS98211.pdf
LaValle, S. M., 2006, Planning Algorithms, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Röschel, O., 1998, “Rational Motion Design—A Survey,” Comput.-Aided Des., 30(3), pp. 169–178. [CrossRef]
Lau, B., Sprunk, C., and Burgard, W., 2009, “Kinodynamic Motion Planning for Mobile Robots Using Splines,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2009), St. Louis, MO, Oct. 10-15, pp. 2427–2433 [CrossRef].
Kobilarov, M. B., and Marsden, J. E., 2011, “Discrete Geometric Optimal Control on Lie Groups,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 27(4), pp. 641–655. [CrossRef]
Selig, J. M., 2007, “Cayley Maps for SE(3),” 12th International Federation of the Theory of Machines and Mechanisms World Congress (IFToMM), Besançon, France, June 18-21 http://www.iftomm.org/iftomm/proceedings/proceedings_WorldCongress/WorldCongress07/articles/sessions/papers/A270.pdf.
Leonard, N., and Krishnaprasad, P. S., 1995, “Motion Control of Drift Free, Left-Invariant Systems on Lie Groups,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 40(9), pp. 1539–1554. [CrossRef]
Justh, E. W., and Krishnaprasad, P. S., 2004, “Equilibria and Steering Laws for Planar Formations,” Syst. Control Lett., 52(1), pp. 25–38. [CrossRef]
Maclean, C., and Biggs, J. D., 2013, “Path Planning for Simple Wheeled Robots: Sub-Riemannian and Elastic Curves on SE(2),” Robotica, 31(8), pp. 1285–1297. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Differential drive (left) and front-wheel steering cars (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Interpolated motion between two given poses. The black, gray, black dashed, and gray dashed curves have b1 = -1,1/3,1(2/3), and 3, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Interpolated motion for a translation in the y-direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Interpolated motion between two poses with zero generalized velocity at either end. In (a) the black, gray, and dashed curves have b2 = 0, 2, and 4, respectively. In (b) the parameter values are b2 = −2, −4, and −6 for the black, gray and dashed curves, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Rest-to-rest motion in the y-direction. The two segments of each motion are shown solid and dashed, respectively. The values of γ used are, from left to right 3, 4, 5, and 7.5.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Minimal path-length. On the left is a contour plot for values of the integral J1 defined in the text. The right hand figure shows the motion given by the optimal values of the parameters a1 ≈ 5.665 and b1 ≈ 0.092.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Minimal control effort. The left hand graph shows the optimal path dashed and the rational approximation in black. On the right is a detail from the graph where the difference between the two can be seen more clearly. The value of the constant c is 1 in the appropriate units.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In