0
Research Papers

Synthesis and Analysis of Soft Parallel Robots Comprised of Active Constraints

[+] Author and Article Information
Jonathan B. Hopkins

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
University of California, Los Angeles,
420 Westwood Plaza,
46-147F Engineering IV. Bldg.,
Los Angeles, CA 90095
e-mail: hopkins@seas.ucla.edu; jonathanbhopkins@gmail.com

Jordan Rivera

Mechanical Engineering,
Bucknell University,
701 Moore Ave.,
Lewisburg, PA 17837
e-mail: jar055@bucknell.edu

Charles Kim

Mechanical Engineering,
Bucknell University,
701 Moore Ave.,
Lewisburg, PA 17837
e-mail: charles.kim@bucknell.edu

Girish Krishnan

Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering,
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
314 Transportation Bldg. 104 S. Mathews,
Urbana, IL 61801
e-mail: gkrishna@illinois.edu

1These are co-first authors due to their equal level of contribution to this paper.

2Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS AND ROBOTICS. Manuscript received September 24, 2014; final manuscript received December 2, 2014; published online December 31, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Carl Nelson.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 7(1), 011002 (Feb 01, 2015) (13 pages) Paper No: JMR-14-1255; doi: 10.1115/1.4029324 History: Received September 24, 2014; Revised December 02, 2014; Online December 31, 2014

In this paper, we introduce a new type of spatial parallel robot that is comprised of soft inflatable constraints called trichamber actuators (TCAs). We extend the principles of the freedom and constraint topologies (FACT) synthesis approach to enable the synthesis and analysis of this new type of soft robot. The concepts of passive and active freedom spaces are introduced and applied to the design of general parallel systems that consist of active constraints (i.e., constraint that can be actuated to impart various loads onto the system's stage) that both drive desired motions and guide the system's desired degrees of freedom (DOFs). We provide the fabrication details of the TCA constraints introduced in this paper and experimentally determine their appropriate FACT-based constraint model. We fabricate a soft parallel robot that consists of three TCA constraints and verify and validate its FACT-predicted performance using finite element analysis (FEA) and experimental data. Other such soft robots are synthesized using FACT as case studies.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Trivedi, D., Rahn, C. D., Kierb, W. M., and Walker, I. D., 2008, “Soft Robotics: Biological Inspiration, State of the Art, and Future Research,” Appl. Bionics Biomech., 5(3), pp. 99–117. [CrossRef]
Iida, F., and Laschi, C., 2011, “Soft Robotics: Challenges and Perspectives,” Procedia Comput. Sci., 7, pp. 99–102. [CrossRef]
Kim, S., Laschi, C., and Trimmer, B., 2013, “Soft Robotics: A Bioinspired Evolution in Robotics,” Trends Biotechnol., 31(5), pp. 287–294. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Morin, S. A., Shepart, R. F., Kwok, S. W., Kwok, S. W., Stokes, A. A., Nemiroski, A., and Whitesides, G. M., 2012, “Camouflage and Display for Soft Machines,” Science, 337(6096), pp. 828–832. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
McMahn, W., Chitrakaran, V., Csencsits, M., Dawson, D., Walker, I. D., Jones, B. A., Pritts, M., Dienno, D., Grissom, M., and Rahn, C. D., 2006, “Field Trials and Testing of the OctArm Continuum Manipulator,” 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2006), Orlando, FL, May 15–19, pp. 2336–2341 [CrossRef].
Bishop-Moser, J., Krishnan, G., Kim, C., and Kota, S., 2012, “Design of Soft Robotic Actuators Using Fluid Filled Fiber-Reinforced Elastomeric Enclosures in Parallel Combinations,” 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2012), Vilamoura, Portugal, Oct. 7–12, pp. 4264–4269 [CrossRef].
Hirai, S., Cusin, P., Tanigawa, H., Masui, T., Konishi, S., and Kawamura, S., 2000, “Qualitative Synthesis of Deformable Cylindrical Actuators Through Constraint Topology,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000), Takamatsu, Japan, Oct. 31–Nov. 5, pp. 197–202 [CrossRef].
Hirai, S., Masui, T., and Kawamura, S., 2001, “Prototyping Pneumatic Group Actuators Composed of Multiple Single-Motion Elastic Tubes,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2001 ICRA), Seoul, South Korea, May 21–26, pp. 3807–3812 [CrossRef].
Suzumori, K., Iikura, S., and Tanaka, H., 1991, “Development of Flexible Microactuator and Its Applications to Robotic Mechanisms,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Sacramento, CA, Apr. 9–11, pp. 1622–1627 [CrossRef].
Martinez, R. V., Branch, J. L., Fish, C. R., Jin, L., Shepherd, R. F., Nunes, R. M. D., Suo, Z., and Whitesides, G. M., 2013, “Robotic Tentacles With Three-Dimensional Mobility Based on Flexible Elastomers,” Adv. Mater., 25(2), pp. 205–212. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Merlet, J.-P., 2006, Parallel Robots, 2nd ed., Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Bothema, R., and Roth, B., 1990, Theoretical Kinematics, Dover, New York.
Hopkins, J. B., and Culpepper, M. L., 2010, “Synthesis of Multi-Degree of Freedom, Parallel Flexure System Concepts Via Freedom and Constraint Topology (FACT)—Part I: Principles,” Precis. Eng., 34(2), pp. 259–270. [CrossRef]
Hopkins, J. B., 2007, “Design of Parallel Flexure Systems Via Freedom and Constraint Topologies (FACT),” Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Ball, R. S., 1900, A Treatise on the Theory of Screws, The University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Phillips, J., 1984, Freedom in Machinery: Volume 1, Introducing Screw Theory, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Hopkins, J. B., 2010, “Design of Flexure-Based Motion Stages for Mechatronic Systems Via Freedom, Actuation and Constraint Topologies (FACT),” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Hopkins, J. B., and Culpepper, M. L., 2010, “A Screw Theory Basis for Quantitative and Graphical Design Tools That Define Layout of Actuators to Minimize Parasitic Errors in Parallel Flexure Systems,” Precis. Eng., 34(4), pp. 767–776. [CrossRef]
Su, H.-J., Hongliang, S., and Yu, J. J., 2012, “A Symbolic Formulation for Analytical Compliance Analysis and Synthesis of Flexure Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 134(5), p. 051009. [CrossRef]
Stewart, D., 1965, “A Platform With Six Degrees of Freedom,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 180(1), pp. 371–386. [CrossRef]
Uicker, J. J., Pennock, G. R., and Shigley, J. E., 2011, Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Desired DOFs (a), freedom and constraint spaces (b), and constraints lie within the space (c)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Parallel system consisting of inflatable TCAs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

TCA. Inflation of combinations of three internal chambers leads to extension (a) or bending (b).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Parameters necessary to define the system's twist–wrench stiffness matrix

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Resulting twist produced by actuating wire (1) (a), system's AFS (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Cross section of a TCA (a), transverse linear stiffness test (b), axial stiffness test (c), torsional stiffness test (d), and calculating the TCA's material properties (e)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

AFS (a), PFS that satisfies conditions (b), its constraint space (c), topology selected from that space (d), and tuned parameters (e)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

AFS (a), PFS that satisfies conditions (b), its constraint space (c), and topology selected (d)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

6DOFs achieved by hexapod robot—three rotations (a)–(c), and three translations (d)–(f)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Geometric parameters for the three-legged soft robot

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Twist vectors that describe the analytical and FEA results drawn to scale (a), and FEA verification (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Experimental setup (a), and twist vectors that describe the analytical and experimental results drawn to scale (b)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In