0
Research Papers

A New Approach to Design of a Lightweight Anthropomorphic Arm for Service Applications

[+] Author and Article Information
Lelai Zhou

Department of Mechanical
and Manufacturing Engineering,
Aalborg University,
Aalborg 9220, Denmark
e-mail: lzh@m-tech.aau.dk

Shaoping Bai

Associate Professor
Department of Mechanical
and Manufacturing Engineering,
Aalborg University,
Aalborg 9220, Denmark
e-mail: shb@m-tech.aau.dk

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS AND ROBOTICS. Manuscript received June 14, 2012; final manuscript received August 1, 2014; published online December 4, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Xianmin Zhang.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 7(3), 031001 (Aug 01, 2015) (12 pages) Paper No: JMR-12-1073; doi: 10.1115/1.4028292 History: Received June 14, 2012; Revised August 01, 2014; Online December 04, 2014

This paper describes a new approach to the design of a lightweight robotic arm for service applications. A major design objective is to achieve a lightweight robot with desired kinematic performance and compliance. This is accomplished by an integrated design optimization approach, where robot kinematics, dynamics, drive-train design and strength analysis by means of finite element analysis (FEA) are generally considered. In this approach, kinematic dimensions, structural dimensions, and the motors and the gearboxes are parameterized as design variables. Constraints are formulated on the basis of kinematic performance, dynamic requirements and structural strength limitations, whereas the main objective is to minimize the weight. The design optimization of a five degree-of-freedom (dof) lightweight arm is demonstrated and the robot development for service application is also presented.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Albu-Schäffer, A., Haddadin, S., Ott, C., Stemmer, A., Wimböck, T., and Hirzinger, G., 2007, “The DLR Lightweight Robot: Design and Control Concepts for Robots in Human Environments,” Ind. Rob., 34(5), pp. 376–385. [CrossRef]
Chedmail, P., and Gautier, M., 1990, “Optimum Choice of Robot Actuators,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 112(4), pp. 361–367. [CrossRef]
Sardellitti, I., Park, J., Shin, D., and Khatib, O., 2007, “Air Muscle Controller Design in the Distributed Macro-Mini (DM2) Actuation Approach,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2007), San Diego, CA, Oct. 29–Nov. 2, pp. 1822–1827. [CrossRef]
Pettersson, M., and Ölvander, J., 2009, “Drive Train Optimization for Industrial Robots,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 25(6), pp. 1419–1423. [CrossRef]
Elmqvist, H., Olsson, H., Mattsson, S. E., and Brück, D., 2005, “Optimization for Design and Parameter Estimation,” International Modelica Conference, Hamburg, Germany, Mar. 7–8, pp. 255–266.
Zhou, L., Bai, S., and Hansen, M. R., 2011, “Design Optimization on the Drive Train of a Light-Weight Robotic Arm,” Mechatronics, 21(3), pp. 560–569. [CrossRef]
Roy, J., and Whitcomb, L. L., 2004, “Comparative Structural Analysis of 2-DOF Semi-Direct-Drive Linkages for Robot Arms,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mech., 4(1), pp. 82–86. [CrossRef]
Pil, A., and Asada, H., 1995, “Rapid Recursive Structure Redesign for Improved Dynamics of a Single Link Robot,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 117(4), pp. 520–526. [CrossRef]
Bai, S., and Zhou, L., 2011, “Design Optimization of a 5 Light-Weight Robotic Arm Under Structural Constraints,” 24th Nordic Seminar on Computational Mechanics, Helsinki, Finland, Nov. 3–4, pp. 119–123.
Zhu, Y., Qiu, J., and Tani, J., 2001, “Simultaneous Optimization of a Two-Link Flexible Robot Arm,” J. Rob. Syst., 18(1), pp. 29–38. [CrossRef]
Rout, B. K., and Mittal, R. K., 2010, “Optimal Design of Manipulator Parameter Using Evolutionary Optimization Techniques,” Robotica, 28(3), pp. 381–395. [CrossRef]
Shiller, Z., and Sundar, S., 1991, “Design of Robotic Manipulators for Optimal Dynamic Performance,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, CA, Apr. 9–11, pp. 344–349. [CrossRef]
Zhou, L., Bai, S., and Hansen, M. R., 2012, “Integrated Dimensional and Drive-Train Design Optimization of a Light-Weight Anthropomorphic Arm,” Rob. Auton. Syst., 60(1), pp. 113–122. [CrossRef]
Denavit, J., and Hartenberg, R. S., 1955, “A Kinematic Notation for Lower Pair Mechanisms Based on Matrices,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 77, pp. 215–221.
Fang, Y., and Tsai, L. W., 2003, “Inverse Velocity and Singularity Analysis of Low-DOF Serial Manipulators,” J. Field Rob., 20(4), pp. 177–188.
Yoshikawa, T., 1985, “Manipulability of Robotic Mechanisms,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 4(2), pp. 3–9. [CrossRef]
Gosselin, C., and Angeles, J., 1991, “A Global Performance Index for the Kinematic Optimization of Robotic Manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 113(3), pp. 220–226. [CrossRef]
Bai, S., 2010, “Optimum Design of Spherical Parallel Manipulators for a Prescribed Workspace,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 45(2), pp. 200–211. [CrossRef]
Harmonic Drive, “Engineering Data for Harmonic Drive Gears,” Harmonic Drive AG, Limburg/Lahn, Germany, www.harmonicdrive.de/cms/upload/pdf/en/cpu_h7.pdf
Norten, R. L., 2010, Machine Design: An Integrated Approach, 4th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Antony, G. G., “Rating and Sizing of Precision Low Backlash Planetary Gearboxes for Automation Motion Control and Robotics Applications,” Neugart USA Corp., Bethel Park, PA, www.neugartusa.com/Service/faq/Gear_Rating.pdf
Box, M. J., 1965, “A New Method of Constrained Optimization and a Comparison With Other Methods,” Comput. J., 8(1), pp. 42–52. [CrossRef]
Guin, J. A., 1968, “Modification of the Complex Method of Constrained Optimization,” Comput. J., 10(4), pp. 416–417. [CrossRef]
Kucuk, S., and Bingul, Z., 2006, “Comparative Study of Performance Indices for Fundamental Robot Manipulators,” Rob. Auton. Syst., 54(7), pp. 567–573. [CrossRef]
Nielsen, M. B., Christensen, S., Mark, S. E., and Peters, R., 2012, “Light-Weight Robotic Arm Serving Drink,” Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLPBrK_sjjI&feature=g-all-u
Kucuk, S., 2013, “Energy Minimization for 3-RRR Fully Planar Parallel Manipulator Using Particle Swarm Optimization,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 62, pp. 129–149. [CrossRef]
Sigmund, O., 1997, “On the Design of Compliant Mechanisms Using Topology Optimization,” Mech. Struct. Mach., 25, pp. 493–524. [CrossRef]
Maxon Motor, Products Catalogue 10/11, Maxon Motor, Sachseln, Switzerland, www.maxonmotor.ch/e-paper/blaetterkatalog/pdf/complete.pdf
Harmonic Drive, 2014, Harmonic Drive Technical Data, Harmonic Drive AG, Limburg/Lahn, Germany, www.harmonicdrive.de/cms/upload/German/B_Produkte/B_Units/kompl_Produktkapitel_CPU_D-E.pdf

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Conceptual design of a 5 dof lightweight anthropomorphic arm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Robotic arm coordinate system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Dimensional parameters of the robotic arm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic view of drive-train model for a single joint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Illustration of the complex method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Functional modules of the integrated optimization approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Boundary conditions of the FEA model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Diagram of the optimization routine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Plots of the trajectories

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Convergence of the weight of the robotic arm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Convergence plots for the design variables of motors and gearboxes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Convergence of dimensional variables. (a) Link length ratio, (b) wh1 and wh2, and (c) ra and rb.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

von-Mises element stress in the original (top) and optimized (bottom) robotic arm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Motor torques for initial and optimal drive-train combinations. (a) Joint 1 and (b) Joint 2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Prototypes of the robot arm. (a) First prototype and (b) second prototype for drink serving (demo video in Ref. [25]).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Control system of the robotic arm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

User interface of the robotic arm control

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In