0
Research Papers

Kinematics and Interfacing of ModRED: A Self-Healing Capable, 4DOF Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robot

[+] Author and Article Information
S. G. M. Hossain, Carl A. Nelson, Khoa D. Chu

Department of Mechanical
and Materials Engineering,
University of Nebraska-Lincoln,
W342 NH,
Lincoln, NE 68588-0526

Prithviraj Dasgupta

University of Nebraska-Omaha,
Department of Computer Science,
6001 Dodge Street,
Omaha, NE 68182-0500

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS AND ROBOTICS. Manuscript received December 19, 2013; final manuscript received July 9, 2014; published online August 18, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Pierre M. Larochelle.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 6(4), 041017 (Aug 18, 2014) (12 pages) Paper No: JMR-13-1256; doi: 10.1115/1.4028132 History: Received December 19, 2013; Revised July 09, 2014

Modular self-reconfigurable robots (MSRs) are systems which rely on modularity for maneuvering over unstructured terrains, while having the ability to complete multiple assigned functions in a distributed way. An MSR should be equipped with robust and efficient docking interfaces to ensure enhanced autonomy and self-reconfiguration ability. Genderless docking is a necessary criterion to maintain homogeneity of the robot modules. This also enables self-healing of a modular robot system in the case of a failed module. The mechanism needs to be compact and lightweight and at the same time have sufficient strength to transfer loads from other connected modules. This research focuses on the design of a modular robot with four degrees of freedom (4DOF) per module and with the goal of achieving higher workspace flexibility and self-healing capability. To explain the working principle of the robot, forward kinematic transformations were derived and workspace and singularity analysis were performed. In addition, to address the issues of interfacing, a rotary plate genderless single-sided docking mechanism—RoGenSiD—was developed. The design methodology included considerations for minimal space and weight as well as for fault tolerance. As a result, this docking mechanism is applicable for multifaceted docking in lattice-type, chain-type, or hybrid-type MSR systems. Several locomotion gaits were proposed and bench-top testing validated the system performance in terms of self-healing capability and generation of locomotion gaits.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Yim, M., Roufas, K., Duff, D., Zhang, Y., Eldershaw, C., and Homans, S., 2003, “Modular Reconfigurable Robots in Space Applications,” Auton. Rob. J., 14(2–3), pp. 225–237. [CrossRef]
Chu, K. D., Hossain, S. G. M., and Nelson, C., 2011, “Design of a Four DOF Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robot With Novel Gaits,” ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE), Washington, DC, August 28–31, ASME Paper No. DETC2011-47746. [CrossRef]
Hossain, S. G. M., Nelson, C. A., and Dasgupta, P., 2013, “RoGenSiD—A Rotary-Plate Genderless Single-Sided Docking Mechanism for Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robots,” ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Information in Engineering Conference (ASME IDETC/CIE), Portland, OR, August 4–7, ASME Paper No. DETC2013-12938. [CrossRef]
Yim, M., Shen, W., Salemi, B., Rus, D., Moll, M., Lipson, H., Klavins, E., and Chirikjian, G. S., 2007, “Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robot Systems: Challenges and Opportunities for the Future,” IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag., 14(1), pp. 43–53. [CrossRef]
Murata, S., and Kurokawa, H., 2007, “Self-Reconfigurable Robot: Shape-Changing Cellular Robots can Exceed Conventional Robot Flexibility,” IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag., 14(1), pp. 71–78. [CrossRef]
Yim, M., Zhang, Y., Roufas, K., Duff, D., and Eldershaw, C., 2003, “Connecting and Disconnecting for Chain Self-Reconfiguration With PolyBot,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 7(4), pp. 442–451. [CrossRef]
Yim, M., 1994, “New Locomotion Gaits,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA, May 8–13, pp. 2508–2514. [CrossRef]
Castano, A., Behar, A., and Will, P., 2002, “The Conro Modules for Reconfigurable Robots,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 7(4), pp. 403–409. [CrossRef]
Kurokawa, H., Tomita, K., Kamimura, A., Kokaji, S., Hasuo, T., and Murata, S., 2008, “Distributed Self Reconfiguration of M-TRAN III Modular Robotic System,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 27(3–4), pp. 373–386. [CrossRef]
Salemi, B., Moll, M., and Shen, W., 2006, “Superbot: A Deployable, Multi-Functional, and Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robotic System,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, October 9–15, pp. 3636–3641.
Moeckel, R., Faquier, C., Drapel, K., Dittrich, E., Upegui, A., and Ijspeert, A., 2006, “Exploring Adaptive Locomotion With YaMor: A Novel Autonomous Modular Robot With Bluetooth Interface,” Ind. Rob., 33(4), pp. 285–290. [CrossRef]
Zykov, V., Mytilinaios, S., Adams, B., and Lipson, H., 2007, “Evolved and Designed Self-Reproducing Modular Robotics,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 23(2), pp. 308–319. [CrossRef]
Lee, W., and Sanderson, A., 1998, “Dynamic Simulation of Tetrahedron-Based Tetrobot,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Victoria, Canada, October 13–17, Vol. 1, pp. 630–635. [CrossRef]
Ryland, G., 2010, “Design of iMobot, an Intelligent Reconfigurable Mobile Robot With Novel Locomotion,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, (ICRA), Anchorage, AK, May 3–7, pp. 60–65. [CrossRef]
Davey, J., Kwok, N., and Yim, M., 2012, “Emulating Self-Reconfigurable Robots—Design of the SMORES System,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems(IROS), Vilamoura, Portugal, October 7–12, pp. 4464–4469. [CrossRef]
Yim, M., 1994, “Locomotion With a Unit-Modular Reconfigurable Robot,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Pamecha, A., Chiang, C. J., Stein, D., and Chirikjian, G. S., 1996, “Design and Implementation of Metamorphic Robots,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers in Engineering Conference, Irvine, CA, August 18–22, Paper No. 96-DETC/MECH-1149.
Rus, D., and Vona, M., 1999, “Self-Reconfiguration Planning With Compressible Unit Modules,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Detroit, MI, May 10–15, pp. 2513–2530. [CrossRef]
Murata, S., Tomita, K., Yoshida, E., Kurokawa, H., and Kokaji, S., 2000, “Self-Reconfigurable Robot Module Design and Simulation,” 6th International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems (IAS-6), Venice, Italy, July 25-27, pp. 911–917.
Kirby, B., Aksak, B., Hoburg, J., Mowry, T., and Pillai, P., 2007, “A Modular Robotic System Using Magnetic Force Effectors,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems(IROS 2007), San Diego, CA, October 29–November 2, pp. 2787–2793. [CrossRef]
Zykov, V., Mytilinaios, E., Adams, B., and Lipson, H., 2005, “Self-Reproducing Machines,” Nature435(7038), pp. 163–164. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gilpin, K., Knaian, A., and Rus, D., 2010, “Robot Pebbles: One Centimeter Modules for Programmable Matter Through Self-Disassembly,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation(ICRA), Anchorage, AK, May 3–7, pp. 2485–2492. [CrossRef]
Ostergard, E. H., Kassow, K., Beck, R., and Lund, H. H., 2006, “Design of the ATRON Lattice-Based Self-Reconfigurable Robot,” Auton. Rob., 21(2), pp. 165–183. [CrossRef]
Sproewitz, A., Asadpour, M., Billard, A., Dillenbourg, P., and Ijspeert, J., 2008, “Roombots—Modular Robots for Adaptive Furniture,” Workshop on Self-Reconfigurable Robots, Systems and Applications at IROS08, Nice, France, September 22, pp. 59–63.
Davey, J., Sastra, J., Piccoli, M., and Yim, M., 2012, “ModLock: A Manual Connector for Reconfigurable Modular Robots,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems(IROS), Vilamoura, Portugal, October 7–12, pp. 3217–3222. [CrossRef]
Shen, W.-M., Kovac, R., and Rubenstein, M., 2009, “SINGO: A Single-End-Operative and Genderless Connector for Self-Reconfiguration, Self-Assembly and Self-Healing,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation(ICRA'09), Kobe, Japan, May 12–17, pp. 4253–4258. [CrossRef]
Craig, J. J., 2005, Introduction to Robotics, Mechanics and Control, 3rd ed., Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp. 149–150.
Kutzer, M. D. M., Moses, M. S., Brown, C. Y., Scheidt, D. H., Chirikjian, G. S., and Armand, M., 2010, “Design of a New Independently-Mobile Reconfigurable Modular Robot,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, (ICRA), Anchorage, AK, May 3–7, pp. 2758–2764. [CrossRef]
Wolfe, K. C., Moses, M. S., Kutzer, M. D. M., and Chirikjian, G. S., 2012, “M3Express: A Low-Cost Independently-Mobile Reconfigurable Modular Robot,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation(ICRA), Minneapolis, St. Paul, MN, May 14–18, pp. 2704–2710. [CrossRef]
Baca, J., Hossain, S. G. M., Dasgupta, P., and Nelson, C. A., 2014, “ModRED: Hardware Design and Reconfiguration Planning for a High Dexterity Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robot for Extra-Terrestrial Exploration,” J. Rob. Auton. Syst., 62(7), pp. 1002–1015. [CrossRef]
Yim, M., Shirmohammadi, B., Sastra, J., Park, M., Dugan, M., and Taylor, C. J., 2007, “Towards Robotic Self-Reassembly After Explosion,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems(IROS 2007), San Diego, CA, October 29–November 2, pp. 2767–2772. [CrossRef]
Santos Merino, C., and Tosunoglu, S., 2004, “Design of a Crawling Gait for a Modular Robot,” 17th Florida Conference on Recent Advances in Robotics Orlando, FL, May 6–7.
Chen, I.-M., Yeo, S. H., and Gao, Y., 2001, “Locomotive Gait Generation for Inchworm-Like Robots Using Finite State Approach,” Robotica19(5), pp. 535–542. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A simple computer-aided design (CAD) model of the ModRED robot showing the four (RRPR) DOF

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Scaled 3D CAD model of a single MSR module showing four motors for the 4DOFs and initially developed docking mechanisms. Each module weighs approximately 6.5 lbs.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of the kinematic components of a ModRED module. The dotted lines represent the side view of a physical module at its home position on which the kinematic components and frames are superimposed. The 3D image in the top left corner depicts an isometric view of the home position of a ModRED module.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The (a) single- and (b) double-module configurations are pictured in green for a visual frame of reference, and the position workspace (one end fixed with the opposite end considered the end effector) is in gray. This is based on the range of motion of the joints (brackets' rotation ±90 deg, axial twist unlimited in both directions, translation 0″–2″). The translation DOF increases the workspace volume substantially (e.g., increasing the thickness of the half-toroid in (a)).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Simulated singularity conditions of a ModRED module. The red dots represent the positions of the tip of the robot (that is, frame 5) that result in singular configurations with frame 0 being fixed.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Working principle of the rotary plates and hermaphroditic locking fingers. As the upper plate (with green fingers) rotates, it locks itself with the bottom plate's purple fingers.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Fabricated rotary plate and curved contour locking fingers assembly (left) and an enlarged view of the curved contour locking fingers (right). The pegs were made thin near the center of the plate and thick near the edge so that a finger's profile interlocks with another finger while docking.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

CAD rendering of the rotary plate/curved contour locking fingers assembly along with the geared stepper motor attached to a worm-gear that rotates the rotary plate containing the locking fingers on its bottom surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Specially designed Delrin plastic alignment pegs with spring-loaded metal connectors attached for power and signal transfer through the attached modules

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The fabricated RoGenSiD mechanism

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

An exploded CAD rendering shows the design of the RoGenSiD mechanism

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Explanation of design for fault tolerance. Misalignment of distance “a” along the Y axis (top left), misalignment by an angle β on XY plane (top right), and misalignment of XZ plane (bottom left). All of these become self-aligned because of the curved contour of the locking fingers (bottom right).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Six different MSR gaits explained using step by step actuations of the 4DOF: (a) one-module pivoted steering, (b) one-module inchworm, (c) two-module inchworm, (d) two-module rolling sideways, (e) two-module twisting, and (f) two-module pivoted steering

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Initial position of the modules—faces 20 mm apart from each other (top left); faces approach each other resulting in establishment of mechanical/ electrical connection through the Delrin alignment pegs (top right); connection strength test after completion of docking. Yellow arrows show bracket movements relative to the modules; blue arrows show resultant shear forces on the docking faces (bottom).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Single-sided undocking test for validating self-healing. From steps 1 through 4, one robot module (left) and a segmented module (right) demonstrate their successful connectivity on various rotary movements. After the assumed failure of the segmented module at step 5, the functional module can still detach using its single-sided docking–undocking capability. The circles on top represent the left and right modules, with green and red representing functional and nonfunctional modules, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Various legged, wheeled, snakelike, and hybrid configurations for locomotion using ModRED II robots

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In