0
Research Papers

Design and Qualification of a Parallel Robotic Platform to Assist With Beating-Heart Intracardiac Interventions

[+] Author and Article Information
Amirhossein Salimi

Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Houston,
Houston, TX 77004
e-mail: asalimi@uh.edu

Amin Ramezanifar

Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Houston,
Houston, TX 77004
e-mail: aramezanifar@uh.edu

Javad Mohammadpour

Mem. ASME
College of Engineering,
The University of Georgia,
Athens, GA 30602
e-mail: javadm@uga.edu

Karolos M. Grigoriadis

Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Houston,
Houston, TX 77004
e-mail: karolos@uh.edu

Nikolaos V. Tsekos

Department of Computer Science,
University of Houston,
Houston, TX 77004
e-mail: nvtsekos@uh.edu

1Corresponding author.

2Previously with University of Houston.

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS AND ROBOTICS. Manuscript received September 5, 2012; final manuscript received November 23, 2013; published online March 4, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Philippe Wenger.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 6(2), 021004 (Mar 04, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: JMR-12-1134; doi: 10.1115/1.4026334 History: Received September 05, 2012; Revised November 23, 2013

Using robotic systems to assist with sophisticated medical interventions such as aortic valve replacement under beating heart conditions necessitates the development of dexterous manipulators to ensure a safe and reliable operation. These mechanisms should not only be capable of tracking the desired trajectories with a high level of accuracy but also need to cope with strict medical constraints such as environment compatibility, patient safety and compactness. In this paper, we propose to design and experimentally qualify a robotic platform that takes into account the aforementioned requirements. Benefiting from the features of a parallel architecture, this four degrees of freedom (DOF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible patient-mounted and cable-driven manipulator (ROBOCATHETER) seeks to steer cardiac catheters under beating heart condition, while suitably addressing the deficiencies that currently used manipulators vastly suffer from. In addition to the detailed description of the robot design and its dedicated power transmission system, we also present the derivation of the robot's forward and inverse kinematic equations. The control algorithm implemented for the system actuation is a varying-gain proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller, whose tracking performance will be examined.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Cole, G., Harrington, K., Su, H., Camilo, A., Pilitsis, J., and Fischer, G., 2010, “Closed-Loop Actuated Surgical System Utilizing Real-Time In-Situ MRI Guidance,” 12th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics-ISER, pp. 2489–2495.
Su, H., Cole, G., and Fischer, G., 2012, “High-Field MRI-Compatible Needle Placement Robots for Prostate Interventions: Pneumatic and Piezoelectric Approaches,” Adv. Robo. Virtual Reality, 26, pp. 3–32. [CrossRef]
Atluri, P., Kozin, E., Hiesinger, W., and Joseph Woo, Y., 2009, “Off-Pump, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Coronary Revascularization Yield Improved Outcomes Over Traditional On-Pump CABG,” Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assisted Surg., 5(1), pp. 1–12. [CrossRef]
Li, M., Mazilu, D., and Horvath, K., 2008, “Robotic System for Transapical Aortic Valve Replacement With MRI Guidance,” Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2008, pp. 476–484.
Li, M., Kapoor, A., Mazilu, D., and Horvath, K., 2011, “Pneumatic Actuated Robotic Assistant System for Aortic Valve Replacement Under MRI Guidance,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 58(2), pp. 443–451. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yeniaras, E., Lamaury, J., Deng, Z., and Tsekos, N. V, 2010, “Towards a New Cyber-Physical System for MRI-Guided and Robot-Assisted Cardiac Procedures,” Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine (ITAB), 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on, pp. 1–5.
Salimi, A., Mohammadpour, J., Grigoriadis, K., and Tsekos, N., 2011, “Dynamic Simulation of Blood Flow Effects on Flexible Manipulators During Intra-Cardiac Procedures on the Beating Heart,” Volume 2, Power and Motion Control, Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, Arlington, VA. October 31–November 2, 2011, Paper No. DSCC2011-6167, pp. 487–494. [CrossRef]
Susil, R., Krieger, A., Derbyshire, J., Tanacs, A., Whitcomb, L., Fichtinger, G., and Atalar, E., 2003, “System for MR Image–Guided Prostate Interventions: Canine Study,” Radiology, 228(3), pp. 886–894. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kim, D., Kobayashi, E., Dohi, T., and Sakuma, I., 2002, “A New, Compact MR-Compatible Surgical Manipulator for Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery,” Proceedings Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), pp. 99–106.
Muntener, M., Patriciu, A., Petrisor, D., Mazilu, D., Bagga, H., Kavoussi, L., Cleary, K., and Stoianovici, D., 2006, “Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compatible Robotic System for Fully Automated Brachytherapy Seed Placement,” Urology, 68(6), pp. 1313–1317. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tsekos, N., Khanicheh, A., Christoforou, E., and Mavroidis, C., 2007, “Magnetic Resonance-Compatible Robotic and Mechatronics Systems for Image-Guided Interventions and Rehabilitation: A Review Study,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 9, pp. 351–387. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Stoianovici, D., Song, D., Petrisor, D., Ursu, D., Mazilu, D., Mutener, M., Schar, M., and Patriciu, A., 2007, “MRI Stealth Robot for Prostate Interventions,” Minim. Invas. Ther. Appl. Technol., 16(4), pp. 241–248. [CrossRef]
Hungr, N., Fouard, C., Robert, A., Bricault, I., and Cinquin, P., 2011, “Interventional Radiology Robot for CT and MRI Guided Percutaneous Interventions,” Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), pp. 137–144.
Ramezanifar, A., Salimi, A., Mohammadpour, J., Kilicarslan, A., Grigoriadis, K., and Tsekos, N., 2011, “Linear Parameter Varying Control of a Robot Manipulator for Aortic Valve Implantation,” Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, Arlington, VA, Vol. 2, October 31–November 2, 2011, Paper No. DSCC2011-6186, pp. 121–127. [CrossRef]
Salimi, A., Ramezanifar, A., Mohammadpour, J., Grigoriadis, K., and Tsekos, N., 2012, “ROBOCATH: A Patient-Mounted Parallel Robot to Position and Orient Surgical Catheters,” Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Vol. 3, October 17–19, 2012, Paper No. DSCC2012-MOVIC2012-8846, pp. 471–480. [CrossRef]
Salimi, A., Ramezanifar, A., Mohammadpour, J., and Grigoriadis, K., 2013, “Development of Master-Slave Robotic Systems for MRI-Guided Intracardiac Interventions,” Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, Palo Alto, CA, Oct. 21–23, 2013.
Salimi, A., Ramezanifar, A., Mohammadpour, J., and Grigoriadis, K., 2013, “Gain-scheduling Control of a Cable-Driven MRI-Compatible Robotic Platform for Intracardiac Interventions,” Proceedings of American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 746–751.
Schauer, D., Hein, A., and Lüth, T., 2003, “Robopoint—An Autoclavable Interactive Miniature Robot for Surgery and Interventional Radiology,” International Congress Series, Elsevier, Vol. 1256, pp. 555–560. [CrossRef]
Schauer, D., Hein, A., and Lüth, T., 2003, “Dynamic Force Control for a Miniaturized Medical Robot System,” Proceedings of IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, July, 20–24, 2003, Vol. 2, pp. 1090–1095. [CrossRef]
Craig, J., 2004, Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control, 3rd ed, Prentice Hall, NJ.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Landmarks used in reaching aortic annulus

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Parallel mechanism architecture (top), and its expanded view (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Transmission system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The coordinate system used in deriving the kinematic equations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Jacobian matrix sensitivity analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Experimental setup including: (1) platform, (2) marker/mass weight, (3) DC motors, (4) transmission system, (5) motor driver board, (6) dSPACE real-time control and data acquisition system, (7) power supply, (8) camera, (9) control desk, (10) optical sensor interrogator, (11) LabView interface, (12) fiber optic sensors bundle, (13) sensor-cable connection point (14) optical encoder (15) DC motor (16) gearbox (17) coupler and pulley (18) stand (19) tension adjustment mechanism (20) sliding pulley, and (21) fixed pulley

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Response of the system with a residual mass

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Trajectory tracking using image feedback

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Tension in the cables (top plot); system response for different pretensions (bottom plot)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In