0
Design Innovation Papers

Design of a Novel Long-Range Inflatable Robotic Arm: Manufacturing and Numerical Evaluation of the Joints and Actuation

[+] Author and Article Information
Sébastien Voisembert

LCPI, EA,
AMPT Paris 75013, France
e-mail: sebastien.voisembert@hotmail.fr

Nazih Mechbal

PIMM, UMR-CNRS,
AMPT Paris 75013, France
e-mail: Nazih.Mechbal@ensam.eu

Alain Riwan

LRI, CEA, LIST,
Fontenay aux Roses F-92265, France
e-mail: alain.riwan@cea.fr

Ameziane Aoussat

LCPI, EA,
AMPT Paris 75013, France
e-mail: Ameziane.AOUSSAT@ensam.eu

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS AND ROBOTICS. Manuscript received August 13, 2012; final manuscript received May 19, 2013; published online October 1, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Philippe Wenger.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 5(4), 045001 (Oct 01, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: JMR-12-1119; doi: 10.1115/1.4025025 History: Received August 13, 2012; Revised May 19, 2013

The aim of this paper is to present the design of a new long-range robotic arm based on an inflatable structure. Inflatable robotics has potential for improved large payload-to-weight ratios, safe collision, and inspection in areas inaccessible to human beings as in nuclear plants. The robot presented here is intended to operate inspection or maintenance missions in critical installation taking care to not collide with its environment. It is made with innovative inflatable joints and an original actuation system. Prototypes of this inflatable manipulator were constructed using two different manufacturing procedures. Using ls-dyna nonlinear dynamic finite element modeling we have numerically analyzed the specific geometry and dynamical behavior of the resulting joints. The simulations have given insight into understanding the joint bending process and have revealed guidance for optimizing the conception.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Finite element model of two links and one central joint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Snapshots of the inflation simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

AIA robot into a full vessel demonstrator (scale 1) [7]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Spacesuit joints are composed of bellows

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Influence of the thickness ratio on the deflections of a cantilever beam submitted to its own weight

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Fabric wrap between two stop-pins

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

End point deflections calculated with the FE model and compared with experimental values

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Ideal shape of an inflatable joint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Sanan's robot arm (a) and a simulated model (b). Our prototype with a space-suit like inflatable joint (c) and a simulated model (d).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Stop-pin principle (a). Joint middle line shortened with stop-pins (b). Joint with stop-pins and screws (c). Two axis prototype made with a PVC coated Polyester fabric (d).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Folding of a simulated stop-pin

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Von Mises stress (MPa) for a 9.2 mm stop-pin joint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Significant responses of stop-pin based joints to a full bending cycle in simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Inflatable joint affected by an exterior force

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Pulley block system forcing the joint to keep a toroïdal shape

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Friction impact on the maximum pitch angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Flat folds (a). Folds generated by stop-pins (b). Folds generated by the wire (c).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Tensions applied on the middle line

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Middle line of a joint with a loosen wire (a). Prototype with two wire-based joints (b). Shortening of the middle line of the joint (c). Simulated shortening of the middle line thanks to muscle elements (d).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Von Mises stress (MPa) in the wire-based joint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Significant responses of stop-pin and wire-based joints to a half bending cycle in simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Comparative evaluation of stop-pin and wire-based joint performances

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Simulated joints submitted to dislocations and pulley blocks systems

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Relative dislocation with different loads and number of pulley blocks

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In