0
Research Papers

Reconfiguration Analysis of a Fully Reconfigurable Parallel Robot

[+] Author and Article Information
Allan Daniel Finistauri

e-mail: dfinista@ryerson.ca

Fengfeng (Jeff) Xi

e-mail: fengxi@ryerson.ca
Department of Aerospace Engineering,
Ryerson University,
350 Victoria Street,
Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS AND ROBOTICS. Manuscript received April 10, 2012; final manuscript received April 25, 2013; published online July 16, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Jian S Dai.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 5(4), 041002 (Jul 16, 2013) (18 pages) Paper No: JMR-12-1044; doi: 10.1115/1.4024734 History: Received April 10, 2012; Revised April 25, 2013

This paper presents a new method for the combined topological and geometric reconfiguration of a parallel robot to achieve task-based reconfiguration. Using the existing structure of a six degree-of-freedom (DOF) parallel robot, reconfiguration to limited mobility modes, a configuration with less than six degrees-of-freedom, can be achieved easily without the need to remove branches from the robot structure. Branch modules are instead, reconfigured from an unconstrained-active to a constrained-passive state by means of hybrid active/passive motors and reconfigurable universal-to-revolute joints. In doing so, the robot is capable of assuming a configuration in which the number of task-based degrees-of-freedom match the number of controllable actuators within the robot structure. The selection of branch modules for reconfiguration is independent of the limited mobility mode required and leads to multiple isomorphic configurations. A comparative study is thus needed to understand not only the implication of morphing, but also the capabilities of the reconfigured robot. For this purpose, a branch-based mobility analysis is performed and isomorphic configurations are identified. These isomorphic configurations are then compared based on their workspace and kinematic capabilities for which a parametric kinematic constraint formulation is developed. The comparative study evaluates the abilities of each configuration and is used for guidance in selecting an appropriate configuration for a particular task. The developed tools can also be used for design evaluation purposes.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Xi, F., Li, Y., and Wang, H., 2011, “Module-Based Method for Design and Analysis of Reconfigurable Parallel Robots,” Front. Mech. Eng., 6(2), pp. 151–159.
Bi, Z. M., and Wang, L., 2009, “Optimal Design of Reconfigurable Parallel Machining Systems,” Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manufact., 25, pp. 951–961. [CrossRef]
Gan, D., Dai, J. S., and Liao, Q., 2009, “Mobility Change in Two Types of Metamorphic Parallel Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 1(4), p. 041007. [CrossRef]
Gan, D., Dai, J. S., and Liao, Q., 2010, “Constraint Analysis on Mobility Change of a Novel Metamorphic Parallel Mechanism,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 45, pp. 1864–1876. [CrossRef]
Gan, D., Dai, J. S., and Caldwell, D. G., 2011, “Constraint-Based Limb Synthesis and Mobility-Changed-Aimed Mechanism Construction,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(5), p. 051001. [CrossRef]
Kotlarski, J., Abdellatif, H., Ortmaier, T., and Heimann, B., 2009, “Enlarging the Useable Workspace of Planar Parallel Robots Using Mechanisms of Variable Geometry,” ASME/IFToMM International Conference on Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots, pp. 94–103.
Bi, Z. M., and Kang, B., 2010, “Enhancement of Adaptability of Parallel Kinematic Machines With an Adjustable Platform,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 132, p. 061016. [CrossRef]
Sun, T., Song, Y., Li, Y., and Zhang, J., 2010, “Workspace Decomposition Based Dimensional Synthesis of a Novel Hybrid Reconfigurable Robot,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 2, p. 031009. [CrossRef]
Chen, C.-T., 2012, “Reconfiguration of a Parallel Kinematic Manipulator for the Maximum Dynamic Load-Carrying Capacity,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 54, pp. 62–75. [CrossRef]
Dash, A. K., Chen, I.-M., Yeo, S. H., and Yang, G., 2005, “Task-Orientated Configuration Design for Reconfigurable Parallel Manipulator Systems,” Int. J. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., 18(7), pp. 615–634. [CrossRef]
Xi, F., Xu, Y., and Xiong, G., 2006, “Design and Analysis of a Re-Configurable Parallel Robot,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 41, pp. 191–211. [CrossRef]
Kong, X., Gosselin, C. M., and Richard, P.-L., 2007, “Type Synthesis of Parallel Mechanisms With Multiple Operation Modes,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 129(6), pp. 595–601. [CrossRef]
Zhang, L., and Dai, J. S., 2008, “Reconfiguration of Spatial Metamorphic Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 1(1), p. 011012. [CrossRef]
Zhang, K., Dai, J. S., and Fang, Y., 2010, “Topology and Constraint Analysis of Phase Change in the Metamorphic Chain and Its Evolved Mechanism,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(12), p. 121001. [CrossRef]
Wang, C., andWang, L., 2010, “A Novel Cad System for Modular Reconfigurable Parallel Robots,” IEEE International Conference on Computer Design and Applications, Vol. 4, pp. 159–163.
Grosch, P., Gregorio, R. D., López, J., and Thomas, F., 2010, “Motion Planning for a Novel Reconfigurable Parallel Manipulator With Lockable Revolute Joints,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 4697–4702.
Brisa, C., and Csiszar, A., 2011, “Computation and Analysis of the Workspace of a Reconfigurable Parallel Robotic System,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 46, pp. 1647–1668. [CrossRef]
Li, S., and Dai, J. S., 2012, “Structure Synthesis of Single-Driven Metamorphic Mechanisms Based on the Augmented Assur Groups,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 4(3), p. 031004. [CrossRef]
Vertuan, A., Legnani, G., Admanini, R., Tosi, D., and Pedrocchi, N., 2009, “Performance Analysis of a Reconfigurable Redundant Parallel Manipulator,” ASME/IFToMM International Conference on Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots, pp. 593–601.
Finistauri, A. D., and Xi, F., 2009, “Type Synthesis and Kinematics of a Modular Variable Geometry Truss Mechanism for Aircraft Wing Morphing,” ASME/IFToMM International Conference on Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots, pp. 470–477.
Finistauri, A. D., Xi, F., and Petz, B., 2008, “Architecture Design and Optimization of an on-the-Fly Reconfigurable Parallel Robot,” Parallel Manipulators—Towards New Applications. InTech. Vienna, Austria, pp. 379–404.
Liu, G., He, X., Yuan, J., and TBD, 2008, “Development of a Modular and Reconfigurable Robot With Multiple Working Modes,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
Tsai, L.-W., 1998, “Systematic Enumeration of Parallel Manipulators,” Technical Report No. TR98-33, University of Maryland, Department of Mechanical Engineering Institute for Systems Research, College Park, MD.
Xi, F., Zhang, D., Xu, Z., and Mechefske, C. M., 2003, “A Comparative Study on Tripod Units for Machine Tools,” Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf., 43, pp. 721–730. [CrossRef]
Joshi, S. A., and Tsai, L.-W., 2002, “Jacobian Analysis of Limited-DOF Parallel Manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 124(2), pp. 254–258. [CrossRef]
Fattah, A., and Ghasemi, A. M. H., 2002, “Isotropic Design of Spatial Parallel Manipulators,” Int. J. Robot. Res., 21(9), pp. 811–824. [CrossRef]
Angeles, J., and López-Cajún, C. S., 1992, “Kinematic Isotropy and Conditioning Index of Serial Robotic Manipulators,” Int. J. Robot. Res., 11(6), pp. 560–571. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Definition of passive leg physical constraint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Reconfigurable parallel robot configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Workspace evaluation of the reconfigurable robot showing angle-view workspace volume and top-view workspace boundaries for the 5-DOF limited mobility mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Workspace evaluation of the reconfigurable robot showing angle-view workspace volume and top-view workspace boundaries for the 4-DOF 1-2 type limited mobility mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Workspace evaluation of the reconfigurable robot showing angle-view workspace volume and top-view workspace boundaries for the 4-DOF 1-3 type limited mobility mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Workspace evaluation of the reconfigurable robot showing angle-view workspace volume and top-view workspace boundaries for the 3-DOF 1-2-3 type limited mobility mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Workspace evaluation of the reconfigurable robot showing angle-view workspace volume and top-view workspace boundaries for the 3-DOF 1-3-5 type limited mobility mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Inverse Jacobian conditioning distribution for the 5-DOF limited mobility mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Inverse Jacobian conditioning distribution for the 4-DOF 1-2 type limited mobility mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Inverse Jacobian conditioning distribution for the 4-DOF 1-3 type limited mobility mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Inverse Jacobian conditioning distribution for the 3-DOF 1-2-3 type limited mobility mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Inverse Jacobian conditioning distribution for the 3-DOF 1-3-5 type limited mobility mode

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In