Research Papers

Quasi-Static Motion Simulation and Slip Prediction of Articulated Planetary Rovers Using a Kinematic Approach

[+] Author and Article Information
Faiz Benamar

e-mail: amar@isir.upmc.fr

Christophe Grand

e-mail: grand@isir.upmc.fr
Institut des Systèmes
Intelligents et de Robotiques,
Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6,
CNRS UMR 7222,
4, place jussieu,
75252 Paris Cedex 05, France

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics. Manuscript received November 29, 2011; final manuscript received February 5, 2013; published online March 26, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Andrew P. Murray.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 5(2), 021002 (Mar 26, 2013) (13 pages) Paper No: JMR-11-1136; doi: 10.1115/1.4023873 History: Received November 29, 2011; Revised February 05, 2013

Wheel slips are unavoidable when moving on a 3D rough surface. They are mainly due to geometrical features of contact surfaces. In this paper, we propose a model for predicting rover motion and contact slips by using a kineto-static model coupled with a linear contact model derived from semiempirical tire/terramechanics approaches. The paper also introduces a coherent approach for motion simulation of uneven articulated rovers which is computationally efficient and can then be used for autonomous on-line path planning. Model results are compared to another numerical model based on a multibody dynamic model including frictional contacts. The well-known rocker-bogie chassis, a highly articulated structure, is chosen to illustrate results and their comparison. Results demonstrate that for a slow motion, the proposed model approximates with a good accuracy the general behavior of the robot with a minimal time computation.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Topics: Simulation , Wheels , Robots
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Bekker, M., 1969, Introduction to Terrain-Vehicle Systems, Univerity of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
Wong, J., 1989, Terramechanics and Off-Road Vehicles, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Iagnemma, K., Kang, S., Shibly, H., and Dubowsky, S., 2004, “Online Terrain Parameter Estimation for Wheeled Mobile Robots With Application to Planetary Rovers,” IEEE Trans. on Rob.Autom., 20(5), pp. 921–927. [CrossRef]
Jain, A., Guineau, J., Lim, C., Lincoln, W., Pomerantz, M., Sohl, G., and Steele, R., 2003, “Roams: Planetary Surface Rover Simulation Environment,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS).
Howard, T., and Kelly, A., 2007, “Optimal Rough Terrain Trajectory Generation for Wheeled Mobile Robots,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 26(1), pp. 141–166. [CrossRef]
Gibbesch, A., and Schafer, B., 2005, “Multibody System Modelling and Simulation of Planetary Rover Mobility on Soft Terrain,” Proceedings of The 8th International Symposium on Artifical Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (iSAIRAS), Munich, Germany.
Thueer, T., Ambroise Krebs, A., Siegwart, R., and Lamon, P., 2007, “Performance Comparison of Rough-Terrain Robots Simulation and Hardware,” J. Field Rob., 24(3), pp. 251–271. [CrossRef]
Ishigami, G., Nagatani, K., and Yoshida, K., 2007, “Path Planning for Planetary Exploration Rovers and its Evaluation Based on Wheel Slip Dynamics,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Robotics and Automation Conference, pp. 2361–2366.
Andrade, G., Benamar, F., Bidaud, P., and Chatila, R., 1998, “Modeling Robot-Soil Interaction for Planetary Rover Motion Control,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Intelligent Robots and Systems Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 576–581.
Krebs, A., Thueer, T., Michaud, S., and Siegwart, R., 2006, “Performance Optimization of All-Terrain Robots: A 2D Quasi-Static Tool,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Intelligent Robots and Systems Conference, pp. 4266–4271.
Benamar, F., Jarrault, P., Bidaud, P., and Grand, C., 2009, “Analysis and Optimization of Obstacle Clearance of Articulated Rovers,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2009, pp. 4128–4133.
Grand, C., Benamar, F., Plumet, F., and Bidaud, P., 2004, “Stability and Traction Optimisation of High Mobility Rover-Application to Hybrid Wheel-Leg Rover,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 23(10–11), pp. 1041–1058. [CrossRef]
Sreenivasan, S., and Wilcox, B., 1994, “Stability and Traction Control of an Actively Actued Micro-Rover,” J. Rob. Syst., 11(6), pp. 487–502. [CrossRef]
Tarokh, M., and McDermott, G. J., 2005, “Kinematics Modeling and Analyses of Articulated Rovers,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 21(4), pp. 539–553. [CrossRef]
Auchter, J., and Moore, C. A., 2008, “Off-Road Robot Modeling with Dextrous Manipulation Kinematics,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2008, pp. 2313–2318.
Li, Z., Hsu, P., and Sastry, S., 1989, “Grasping and Coordinated Manipulation by a Multifingered Robot Hand,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 8(4), pp. 33–50. [CrossRef]
Chakraborty, N., and Ghosal, A., 2004, “Kinematics of Wheeled Mobile Robots on Uneven Terrain,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 39, pp. 1273–1287. [CrossRef]
Trinkle, J., 1989, “A Quasi-Static Analysis of Dextrous Manipulation with Sliding and Rolling Contacts,” Proceedings of the 1989 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 2, pp. 788–793.
Peshkin, M., and Sanderson, A., 1989, “Minimization of Energy in Quasi-Static Manipulation,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 5(1), pp. 53–60. [CrossRef]
Kumar, V., and Waldron, K., 1988, “Force Distribution in Closed Kinematic Chains,” IEEE J. Rob. Autom., 4(6), pp. 657–663. [CrossRef]
Selig, J., 2005, Geometric Fundamentals of Robotics, Springer, New York.
Murray, R., Li, Z., and Sastry, S., 1994, A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Pacejka, H., 2002, Tyre and Vehicle Dynamics, Butterworth-Heinemann, Washington, DC.
Bickler, D. B., 1989, “Articulated Suspension Systems,” US Patent No. 4,840,394.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Serial kinematic chain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Transformation matrices between joint, contact and task frames in both velocity and force domains

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Friction models comparison

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Iterative process for computing the initial complete robot pose

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Simulation scheme of rover quasi-static motion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Adams GUI: crossing two shifted sigmoids

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Configuration parameters as function of x abscissa: kineto-static model (red) versus dynamic model (blue) (as shown in the online version)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Lateral slip velocity as function of x abscissa: kineto-static model (red) versus dynamic model (blue) (as shown in the online version)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Longitudinal slip velocity as function of x abscissa: kineto-static model (red) versus dynamic model (blue) (as shown in the online version)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Normal forces as function of x abscissa: kineto-static model (red) versus dynamic model (blue) (as shown in the online version)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Adams GUI: crossing diagonally a corrugated surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Kinematics of a rocker-bogie rover and joint parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Kinematic dimensions of the rocker-bogie robot

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Trajectory comparison of middle wheel centers when traveling on a highly rough surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Performed path and yaw angles: kineto-static model (red) versus dynamic model (blue) (as shown on the online version)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In