Research Papers

Variable Stiffness Legs for Robust, Efficient, and Stable Dynamic Running

[+] Author and Article Information
Kevin C. Galloway

Wyss Institute for Biologically
Inspired Engineering,
Harvard University,
Cambridge, MA 02138
e-mail: kevin.galloway@wyss.harvard.edu

Jonathan E. Clark

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Florida A&M University/
Florida State University,
College of Engineering,
Tallahassee, FL 32310
e-mail: clarkj@eng.fsu.edu

Daniel E. Koditschek

GRASP Laboratory,
Department of Electrical and
Systems Engineering,
University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA 19104
e-mail: kod@seas.upenn.edu

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics. Manuscript received August 2, 2011; final manuscript received September 1, 2012; published online January 24, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Vijay Kumar.

J. Mechanisms Robotics 5(1), 011009 (Jan 24, 2013) (11 pages) Paper No: JMR-11-1087; doi: 10.1115/1.4007843 History: Received August 02, 2011; Revised September 01, 2012

Humans and animals adapt their leg impedance during running for both internal (e.g., loading) and external (e.g., surface) changes. To date, the mechanical complexity of designing usefully robust tunable passive compliance into legs has precluded their implementation on practical running robots. This work describes the design of novel, structure-controlled stiffness legs for a hexapedal running robot to enable runtime modification of leg stiffness in a small, lightweight, and rugged package. As part of this investigation, we also study the effect of varying leg stiffness on the performance of a dynamical running robot.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

EduBot [22], a hexapod robot considered for studying the effect of the legs with variable stiffness on the robot's dynamic stability

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Illustrations of the different spring models used to understand C-leg compliance under load a load, P. (a) Linear model, (b) 2-orthogonal spring model, (c) pseduo-rigid-body model where stiffness is characterized by a single torsional spring.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Pseudo-rigid-body model applied to the C-leg. Adapted from Ref. [44].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

An implementation of a structure-controlled stiffness mechanism applied to a C-leg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Application of PRB-model to tunable leg where leg stiffness can be defined by the slider position and the loading point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Relaxed and compressed images of a C-leg in the experimental set-up

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Experimental validation of the PRB model for estimating torsional spring constant

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Experimental validation of the cantilever beam bending model for estimating lateral leg stiffness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Top view of experimental set-up. (a) Linear stage is in the home position and leg is undeflected. (b) Platform has been moved a distance, d, and the leg is deflected.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Spring force response at four different leg stiffness settings each with a curve fit (dotted line) applied to the loading phase

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Proposed new design: side view of tunable stiffness composite leg design. (a) Rotation directions of gears. (b) Slider adjusted to a higher stiffness setting.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Photograph of the prototyped variable stiffness C-leg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Close-up of the active component

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Older design alternative: C-leg with a Nitinol spring element

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Deflection path of leg for various stiffness settings

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Preliminary experimental results showing specific resistance against relative leg stiffness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Preliminary experimental results comparing relative leg stiffness against top forward speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Final leg design: (left) illustration of mechanical stop, (right) photo of final assembly




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In